Skip to main content
Log in

Multivariate density estimation: A comparative study

  • Articles
  • Published:
Neural Computing & Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is a continuation of the authors' earlier work [1], where a version of the Tråvén's [2] Gaussian clustering neural network (being a recursive counterpart of the EM algorithm) has been investigated. A comparative simulation study of the Gaussian clustering algorithm [1], two versions of plug-in kernel estimators and a version of Friedman's projection pursuit algorithm are presented for two- and three-dimensional data. Simulations show that the projection pursuit algorithm is a good or a very good estimator, provided, however, that the number of projections is suitably chosen. Although practically confined to estimating normal mixtures, the simulations confirm general reliability of plug-in estimators, and show the same property of the Gaussian clustering algorithm. Indeed, the simulations confirm the earlier conjecture that this last estimator proivdes a way of effectively estimating arbitrary and highly structured continuous densities on Rd, at least for small d, either by using this estimator itself or, rather, by using it as a pilot estimator for a newly proposed plug-in estimator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ćwik J, Koronacki J. Probability density estimation using a Gaussian clustering algorithm. Neural Comput & Applic 1996; 4: 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tråvén HGC. A neural network approach to statistical pattern classification by semiparametric estimation of probability density functions. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 1991; 2: 366–377.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Specht DF. Probabilistic Neural Networks. Neural Networks 1990; 3: 109–118.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Härdie W. Smoothing Techniques. Springer-Verlag, 1991.

  5. Scott DW. Multivariate Density Estimation: Theory, practice, and visualization. Wiley, 1992.

  6. Sheather SJ. The performance of six popular bandwidth selection methods on some real data sets. Comp Statist 1992; 7: 225–250.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Park BU, Turlach BA. Practical performance of several data driven bandwidth selectors. Comp Statist 1992; 7: 251–270.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cao R, Cuevas A, Gonzales-Manteiga W. A comparative study of several smoothing methods in density estimation. Comp Statist Data Analysis 1994; 17: 153–176.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ciesielski Z. Asymptotic nonparametric spline density estimation. Probab Math Statist 1991; 12: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wand MP, Marron JS, Ruppert D. Transformations in density estimation. J Am Statist Assoc 1991; 86: 343–353.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ruppert D, Cline DBH. Bias reduction in kernel density estimation by smoothed empirical transformations. Ann Statist 1994; 22: 185–210.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wand MP. Error analysis for general multivariate kernel estimators. J Nonpar Statist 1992; 2: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wand MP, Jones MC. Comparison of smoothing parametrizations in bivariate kernel density estimation. J Am Statist Assoc 1993; 88: 520–528.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ciesielski Z. Asymptotic nonparametric spline density estimation in several variables. International Studies of Numerical Mathematics, Birkhauser, 1990; 94: 25–53.

    Google Scholar 

  15. O'Sullivan F, Pawitan Y. Multidimensional density estimation by tomography. J R Statist Soc B 1993; 55: 509–521.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sain S, Baggerly K, Scott DW. Cross-validation of multivariate densities. J Am Statist Assoc 1994; 89: 807–817.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wand MP, Jones MC. Multivariate plug-in bandwidth selection. Comp Statist 1994; 9: 97–116.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Titterington DM. Recursive parameter estimation using incomplete data. JR Statist Soc B 1984; 46: 257–267.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sheather SJ, Jones MC. A reliable data-based bandwidth selection method for kernel density estimation. J Roy Statist Soc B 1991; 53: 683–690.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wand MP, Jones MC. Comparison of smoothing parameterizations in bivariate kernel density estimation. Technical Report, Department of Statistics, Rice University, 1991.

  21. Ćwik J and J Koronacki, A combined adaptivemixtures/plug-in estimator of multivariate probability densities. Comp Statist Data Analysis 1997 (to appear).

  22. Friedman JH, Stuetzle W, Schroeder A. Projection pursuit density estimation. Am Statist Assoc 1984; 79: 599–608.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Friedman JH. Exploratory projection pursuit. J Am Statist Assoc 1987; 82: 249–266.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Huber PJ. Projection pursuit. Ann Statist 1985; 13: 435–475.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Priebe CE. Adaptive mixtures. J Am Statist Assoc 1994; 89: 796–806.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Silverman BW. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman & Hall, 1986.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ćwik, J., Koronacki, J. Multivariate density estimation: A comparative study. Neural Comput & Applic 6, 173–185 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01413829

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01413829

Keywords

Navigation