Skip to main content
Log in

Control surface failure detection and accommodation using neuro-controllers

  • Articles
  • Published:
Neural Computing & Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ability of neural networks to learn from repeated exposure to system characteristics has made them a popular choice for many applications in linear and non-linear control. In this paper, the capabilities of neural networks in detecting and accommodating control surface failures for a modified F/A-18 ‘super-manoeuverable’ fighter aircraft are examined. To detect and accommodate a failure in the thrust vectoring vane during a pitch manoeuvre, a hierarchical neuro-controller is designed using thrust vectoring, symmetric leading edge flap and the throttle. This neuro- controller is then used as the fault accommodating neuro- controller. A separate neural network is trained to detect failures in the thrust vectoring vane. The performance of the controller and fault-detection networks are verified using a numerical simulation of a longitudinal model of the aircraft.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gertler JJ. Survey of model-based failure detection and isolation in complex plants. IEEE Contr Syst Mag 1988; December

  2. Stengel RF. Intelligent failure-tolerant control. IEEE Cont Syst Mag 1991; June

  3. Rauch EH, Kline-Schoder RJ, Adams JC, Youssef HM. Fault detection, isolation, and reconfiguration for aircraft using neural network. In: Proceedings 1993 AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, pp. 1527–1537

  4. Narendra KS, Parathasarsthy K. Identification and control of dynamic systems using neural networks. IEEE Trans Neural Net 1990; March

  5. Smith JC, Walters RV, Jex HR, Alphonso BL. Application of an adaptive clustering network to light control of a fighter aircraft. National Information Technical Service #92-18842, 19 December 1991

  6. Bishop T, Grennwood D, Shew K, Stevenson F. Space shuttle main engine fault detection using neural networks. In: Proceedings of the Second Joint Technology Workshop on Neural Networks and Fuzzy Logic, 1991, NITS #N91-20816.

  7. Werbos PJ. Back-propagation through time: what it does and how to do it. In: Proceedings IEEE 1990; 78: 1550–1560

    Google Scholar 

  8. Werbos PJ. A menu of designs for reinforcement learning over time. In: Neural Networks for Control, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990, p. 67

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sutton RS. Learning to predict the method of temporal differences. Machine Learning 1988; 3:9–44

    Google Scholar 

  10. Valavani L, Voulgaris P. High performance linear-quadratic and hi-infinity designs for a ‘super-manoeuverable’ aircraft. J Guidance, Contr Dynamics 1991;14(1) 157–165

    Google Scholar 

  11. KrishnaKumar K. Optimization of the neural net connectivity pattern using a back-propagation algorithm. J Neurocomput 1993; 5: 1–14

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. KrishnaKumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

KrishnaKumar, K., Lattus, R. Control surface failure detection and accommodation using neuro-controllers. Neural Comput & Applic 2, 120–128 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01415007

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01415007

Keywords

Navigation