Skip to main content
Log in

Insights into the interior-point methods

  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Operations-Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we study the search directions of three important interior-point algorithms, namely, the primal-affine scaling method (with logarithmic barrier function), the dual-affine scaling method (with logarithmic barrier function), and the primal-dual interior point method. From an algebraic point of view, we show that the search directions of these three algorithms are merely Newton directions along three different “paths” that lead to a solution of the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions of a given linear programming problem. From a geometric point of view, we show that these directions can be obtained by solving certain well-defined subproblems. Both views provide a general platform for studying the existing interior-point methods and deriving new interior-point algorithms. We illustrate the derivation of new interior-point algorithms by replacing the logarithmic barrier function with an entropic barrier function. The results have been generalized and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adler I, Karmarkar N, Resende MGC, Veiga G (1986) An Implementation of Karmarkar's Algorithm for Linear Programming. Working paper, Operations Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barnes ER (1986) A Variation on Karmarkar's Algorithm for Solving Linear Programming Problems. Mathematical Programming 36:174–182

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Fang S-C (1990) A New Unconstrained Convex Programming Approach to Linear Programming. OR Report No 243, North Carolina State University

  4. Gill PE, Murray W (1974) Numerical Methods for Constrained Optimization. Academic Press, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Gill PE, Murray W, Saunders MA, Tomlin JA, Wright MH (1986) On Projected Barrier Methods for Linear Programming and an Equivalence to Karmarkar's Projective Method. Mathematical Programming 36:183–209

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Gonzaga C (1987) An Algorithm for Solving Linear Programming Problems inO(n 3L) Operations. Memorandum # UCB/ERLM87/10. Electronics Laboratory, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  7. Karmarkar N (1984) A New Polynomial Time Algorithm for Linear Programming. Combinatorica 4:373–395

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Kojima M, Mizuno S, Yoshise A (1987) A Primal-dual Interior Point Method for Linear Programming. Research Report B-188. Department of Information Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  9. Megiddo N (1986) Pathways to the Optimal Set of Linear Programming. IBM Research Report RJ 5295, IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, California

    Google Scholar 

  10. Megiddo N (1989) Progress in Mathematical Programming: Interior-Point and Related Methods. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Monteiro RC, Adler I (1987) AnO(n 3L) Primal-dual Interior Point Algorithm for Linear Programming. Manuscript, Department of IE & OR, University of California, Berkeley, California. To appear in Mathematical Programming

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nazareth JL (1989) Pricing Criteria in Linear Programming. In: Progress in Mathematical Programming: Interior-Point and Related Methods. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nomizu K (1966) Fundamentals of Linear Algebra. McGraw-Hill, New Jersey

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Shanno DF, Bagchi A (1988) A Unified View of Interior Point Methods for Linear Programming. Rutcor Research Report # 35-88

  15. Pshenichny BN, Danilin YM (1978) Numerical Methods in Extremal Problems. Mir Publishers, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vanderbei RJ, Meketon MS, Freeman BA (1986) A Modification of Karmarkar's Linear Programming Algorithm. Algorithmica 1:395–407

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Ye Y (1989) An Extension of Karmarkar's Algorithm of the Trust Region Method for Quadratic Programming. In: Progress in Mathematical Programming: Interior-Point and Related Methods. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work is partially supported by the North Carolina Supercomputing Center 1990 Cray Grant Program sponsored by Cray Research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sheu, R.L., Fang, S.C. Insights into the interior-point methods. ZOR - Methods and Models of Operations Research 36, 227–257 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01415890

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01415890

Key words

Navigation