Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

Though they constitute the major knowledge source in problem-solving systems, no unified theory of heuristics has emerged. Pearl [15] defines heuristics as “criteria, methods, or principles for deciding which among several alternative courses of action promises to be the most effective in order to achieve some goal”. The absence of a more precise definition has impeded our efforts to understand, utilize, and discover heuristics. Another consequence is that problem-solving techniques which rely on heuristic knowledge cannot be relied upon to act rationally — in the sense of the normative theory of rationality.

To provide a sound basis for BPS, the Bayesian Problem-Solver, we have developed a simple formal theory of heuristics, which is general enough to subsume traditional heuristic functions as well as other forms of problem-solving knowledge, and to straddle disparate problem domains. Probabilistic heuristic estimates represent a probabilistic association of sensations with prior experience — specifically, a mapping from observations directly to subjective probabilities which enables the use of theoretically principled mechanisms for coherent inference and decision making during problem-solving. This paper discusses some of the implications of this theory, and describes its successful application in BPS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Cheeseman, In defense of probability, in:Proc. Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, Los Angeles (1985).

  2. P. Cheeseman and M. Self, Bayesian prediction for Artificial Intelligence, in:Proc. 3rd Workshop on Uncertainty in AI, Seattle (1987).

  3. R. Descartes,Discourse on Method: Optics (1637).

  4. R.O. Duda and P.E. Hart,Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis (Wiley, New York, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  5. I.J. Good, A five year plan for automatic chess, Machine Intelligence 2 (1968).

  6. I.J. Good,The Estimation of Probabilities (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  7. O. Hansson and A. Mayer, Heuristic search as evidential reasoning, In:Proc. 5th Workshop on Uncertainty in AI, Windsor, Ontario (1989).

  8. O. Hansson and A. Mayer, The optimality of satisficing solutions, in:Proc. 4th Workshop on Uncertainty in AI, Minneapolis (1988).

  9. E. Horvitz, Reasoning under varying and uncertain resource constraints, in:Proc. National Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, Minneapolis (1988).

  10. R.A. Howard, Information value theory, IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SSC-2 (1965) 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  11. K.-F. Lee and S. Mahajan, A pattern classification approach to evaluation function learning, Artificial Intelligence 36 (1988).

  12. E.T. Jaynes,Papers on Probability, Statistics and Statistical Physics, ed. R.D. Rosenkrantz (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Newell, J.C. Shaw and H.A. Simon, Chess-playing programs and the problem of complexity, in:Computers and Thought, eds. E.A. Feigenbaum and J. Feldman (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Newell and H.A. Simon,Human Problem Solving (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Pearl,Heuristics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Pearl,Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Raiffa and R.L. Keeney,Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (Wiley, New York, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  18. H. Raiffa and R. Schlaifer,Applied Statistical Decision Theory (Harvard University, 1961).

  19. S.J. Russell and E. Wefald, An optimal game-tree search using rational meta-reasoning, in:Proc. Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, Detroit (1989).

  20. C.E. Shannon, Programming a computer for playing chess, Philos. Mag. 41 (1950) 256–275.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. von Neumann and O. Morgenstern,Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University, 1944).

  22. D. von Winterfeldt and W. Edwards,Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research (Cambridge University Press, 1986).

  23. A. Wald,Statistical Decision Functions (Wiley, New York, 1950).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was made possible by support from Heuristicrats, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and the Rand Corporation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hansson, O., Mayer, A. Probabilistic heuristic estimates. Ann Math Artif Intell 2, 209–220 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531007

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531007

Keywords

Navigation