Skip to main content
Log in

The expected complexity of analytic tableaux analyses in propositional calculus — II

  • Published:
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article continues a study of the complexity of an analytic tableaux algorithm for SAT. The main result is that the average number of branches in analytic tableaux of formulae of lengthn isΘ((1.09988...)n). The maximum number of branches is also studied. Both the average and worst case complexity measures are used to compare analytic tableaux and truth tables.

For the average case result the precise number of consistent branches and the precise number of inconsistent branches (for formulae of lengthn) are each expressed as multiply indexed sums whose terms involve factorials and Stirling numbers of the second kind. The asymptotic behavior of these sums is determined by adapting a classical technique for determining the asymptotic behavior of singly indexed sums whose terms involve factorials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E.A. Bender, Asymptotic methods in enumeration, SIAM Rev. 16 (1974) 485–515.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Brown and P. Purdom Jr., An average time analysis of backtracking, Siam J. Comput. 10 (1981) 583–593.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Chao and J. Franco, Probabilistic analysis of the unit clause and maximum occurring literal selection heuristics for the 3-satisfiability problem, preprint.

  4. M. Chao and J. Franco, Probabilistic analysis of a generalization of the unit clause literal selection heuristic for thek-satisfiability problem, preprint.

  5. J. Franco, Probabilistic analysis of the pure literal heuristic for the satisfiability problem, Ann. Oper. Res. 1 (1984) 273–289.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Franco and M. Paull, Probabilistic analysis of the Davis-Putnam procedure for solving the satisfiability problem, Discr. Appl. Math. 5 (1983) 77–87.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Franco, J. Plotkin and J. Rosenthal, Correction to probabilistic analysis of the Davis-Putnam procedure for solving the satisfiability problem, Discr. Appl. Math. 17 (1987) 295–299.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Goldberg, P. Purdom and C. Brown, Average time analysis of simplified Davis-Putnam procedures, Inform. Proc. Lett. 15 (1982) 72–75.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Goldberg, P. Purdom and C. Brown, Corrigendum average time analysis of simplified Davis-Putnam procedures, Inform. Proc. Lett. 16 (1983) 213.

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Moser and M. Wyman, Stirling numbers of the second kind, Duke Math. J. 25 (1958) 29–43.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.M. Plotkin and J.W. Rosenthal, the expected complexity of analytic tableaux analyses in propositional calculus, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 23 (1982) 409–426.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.M. Plotkin and J.W. Rosenthal, The probability of pure literals, submitted to Ann. Oper. Res.

  13. P. Purdom Jr. and C. Brown, An analysis of backtracking with search rearrangement, Siam J. Comput. 12 (1983) 717–733.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Riordan,Combinatorial Identities (Wiley, New York, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Smullyan,First Order Logic (Springer, New York, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosenthal, J.W. The expected complexity of analytic tableaux analyses in propositional calculus — II. Ann Math Artif Intell 6, 201–234 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531029

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531029

Keywords

Navigation