Skip to main content
Log in

Open questions in complexity theory for numerical optimization

  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Referencess

  • M. Bellare and P. Rogaway, “The complexity of approximating a non-linear program,” unpublished manuscript, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center (Yorktown Heights, NY, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • M.E. Dyer, “Linear time algorithms for two- and three-variable linear programs,”SIAM Journal on Computing 13 (1984) 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • G.M. Guisewite and P.M. Pardalos, “Minimum concave-cost network flow problems: Applications, complexity, and algorithms,”Annals of Operations Research 25 (1990) 75–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • G.M. Guisewite and P.M. Pardalos, “A polynomially solvable concave network flow problem,” to appear in:Networks (1992).

  • C.-G. Han, P.M. Pardalos and Y. Ye, “An interior point algorithm for indefinite quadratic programming,” manuscript (1991).

  • D.S. Johnson, C.H. Papadimitriou and M. Yannakakis, “How easy is local search,”Journal of Computer and System Sciences 37 (1988) 79–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • C.E. Lemke, “Bimatrix equilibrium points and mathematical programming,”Management Science 11 (1965) 681–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Megiddo, “Linear programming in linear time when the dimension is fixed,”Journal of the ACM 31 (1984) 114–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Megiddo, “A note on the complexity of P-matrix LCP and computing an equilibrium,” Research Report RJ 6439, IBM Almaden Research Center (San Jose, CA, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • J.J. Moré and S.A. Vavasis, “On the solution of concave knapsack problems,”Mathematical Programming 49 (1991) 397–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • K.G. Murty, “Computational complexity of complementary pivot methods,”Mathematical Programming Study 7 (1978) 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • K.G. Murty and S.N. Kabadi, “Some NP-complete problems in quadratic and nonlinear programming,”Mathematical Programming 39 (1987) 117–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • C.H. Papadimitriou, “On the complexity of the parity argument and other inefficient proofs of existence,” unpublished manuscript, University of California at San Diego (La Jolla, CA, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • P.M. Pardalos and G. Schnitger, “Checking local optimality in constrained quadratic programming is NP-hard,”Operations Research Letters 7 (1988) 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • P.M. Pardalos and S.A. Vavasis, “Quadratic programming with one negative eigenvalue is NP-hard,”Journal of Global Optimization 1 (1991) 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • É. Tardos, “A strongly polynomial algorithm to solve combinatorial linear programs,”Operations Research 34 (1986) 250–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.F. Traub and H. Woźniakowski, “Complexity of linear programming,”Operations Research Letters 1 (1982) 59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • S.A. Vavasis,Nonlinear Optimization: Complexity Issues (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • S.A. Vavasis, “On approximation algorithms for concave quadratic programming,” in: C.A. Floudas and P. Pardalos, eds.,Recent Advances in Global Optimization (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1992a) pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • S.A. Vavasis, “Approximation algorithms for indefinite quadratic programming,”Mathematical Programming (Series B) 57 (1992b) 279–311, this issue.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pardalos, P.M., Vavasis, S.A. Open questions in complexity theory for numerical optimization. Mathematical Programming 57, 337–339 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581088

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581088

Keywords

Navigation