Skip to main content
Log in

Additively decomposed quasiconvex functions

  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

Letf be a real-valued function defined on the product ofm finite-dimensional open convex setsX 1, ⋯,X m .

Assume thatf is quasiconvex and is the sum of nonconstant functionsf 1, ⋯,f m defined on the respective factor sets. Then everyf i is continuous; with at most one exception every functionf i is convex; if the exception arises, all the other functions have a strict convexity property and the nonconvex function has several of the differentiability properties of a convex function.

We define the convexity index of a functionf i appearing as a term in an additive decomposition of a quasiconvex function, and we study the properties of that index. In particular, in the case of two one-dimensional factor sets, we characterize the quasiconvexity of an additively decomposed functionf either in terms of the nonnegativity of the sum of the convexity indices off 1 andf 2, or, equivalently, in terms of the separation of the graphs off 1 andf 2 by means of a logarithmic function. We investigate the extension of these results to the case ofm factor sets of arbitrary finite dimensions. The introduction discusses applications to economic theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • M. Aoki, “An investment planning process for an economy with increasing returns”,Review of Economic Studies 38 (1971) 273–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • K.J. Arrow, “Le rôle des valeurs boursières pour la répartition la meilleure des risques”,Econométrie, Paris, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (1953) 41–48. Translated as “The role of securities in the optimal allocation of risk-bearing”,Review of Economic Studies 31 (1964) 91–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • K.J. Arrow and A.C. Enthoven, “Quasi-concave programming”,Econometrica 29 (1961) 779–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Avriel, “r-convex functions”,Mathematical Programming 2 (1972) 309–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Blackorby, R. Davidson and D. Donaldson, “A homiletic exposition of the expected utility hypothesis”,Economica 44 (1977) 351–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.C. Cox, “A theorem on additively-separable quasi-concave functions”,Journal of Economic Theory 6 (1973) 210–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.P. Crouzeix, “Conjugacy in quasi-convex analysis”, in: A. Auslander, ed.,Convex analysis and its applications (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1977) pp. 66–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.P. Crouzeix, “Continuity and differentiability properties of quasiconvex functions onR n”, in: S. Schaible and W.T. Ziemba, eds.,Generalized concavity in optimization and economics (Academic Press, New York, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Debreu, “Topological methods in cardinal utility theory”, in: K.J. Arrow, S. Karlin and P. Suppes, eds.,Mathematical methods in the social sciences, 1959 (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 1960) pp. 16–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Dierker, C. Fourgeaud and W. Neuefeind, “Increasing returns to scale and productive systems”,Journal of Economic Theory 13 (1976) 428–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • H.G. Eggleston,Convexity (Cambridge University Press, London, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Fenchel, “Convex cones, sets, and functions”, Lecture notes, Department of Mathematics, Princeton University (Princeton, NJ, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  • J.A. Ferland, “Quasiconvex and pseudoconvex functions on solid convex sets”, Dissertation, Stanford University (Stanford, CA, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Fourgeaud, B. Lenclud and P. Sentis, “Equilibre, optimum et décentralisation dans un cas de rendement croissant”,Cahiers du Séminaire d'Econométrie, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, 15 (1974) 29–46.

  • W.M. Gorman, “The concavity of additive utility functions”, Research Memorandum, The University of North Carolina (1970).

  • J. Green, “Direct additivity and consumers' behaviour”,Oxford Economic Papers 13 (1961) 132–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • H.J. Greenberg and W.P. Pierskalla, “A review of quasi-convex functions”,Operations Research 19 (1971) 1553–1570.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Grodal, “Some further results on integral representation of utility functions”, unpublished manuscript, Institute of Economics, University of Copenhagen (Copenhagen, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Guesnerie, “Pareto optimality in non-convex economies”,Econometrica 43 (1975) 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hirshleifer, “Investment decision under uncertainty: Choice-theoretic approaches”,Quarterly Journal of Economics 79 (1965) 509–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.L. Kelley,General topology (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  • T.C. Koopmans, “Iff(x) + g(y) is quasi-convex, at least one off(x), g(y) is convex”, Mimeographed, Yale University (New Haven, CT, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • J.J. Laffont, “Une note sur la compatibilité entre rendements croissants et concurrence parfaite”,Revue d'Economie Politique 82 (1972) 1188–1193.

    Google Scholar 

  • P.O. Lindberg, “On classes of quasiconvex functions onR, closed under addition and translation”, unpublished manuscript, Department of Mathematics, Royal Institute of Technology (Stockholm, 1980a).

    Google Scholar 

  • P.O. Lindberg, “Onr-convex functions”, unpublished manuscript, Department of Mathematics, Royal Institute of Technology (Stockholm, 1980b).

    Google Scholar 

  • P.O. Lindberg, “On separable quasiconcave functions”, unpublished manuscript, Department of Mathematics, Royal Institute of Technology (Stockholm, 1980c).

    Google Scholar 

  • P.O. Lindberg, “A class of convexifiable functions”, in: S. Schaible and W.T. Ziemba, eds.,Generalized concavity in optimization and economics (Academic Press, New York, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Rader,Theory of microeconomics (Academic Press, New York, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Riesz and B. Sz.-Nagy,Functional analysis (Ungar, New York, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  • A.W. Roberts and D.E. Varberg,Convex functions (Academic Press, New York, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • R.W. Shephard,Cost and production functions (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  • E.E. Slutsky, “Sulla teoria del bilancio del consumatore”,Giornale degli economisti 51 (1915) 1–26. Translated as “On the theory of the budget of the consumer”, in:Readings in price theory, American Economic Association (Richard Irwin, 1952) pp. 27–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Stoer and C. Witzgall,Convexity and optimization in finite dimensions I (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Thorlund-Petersen, “Concave, additive utility representations and fair division of a random income”, unpublished manuscript, Institute of Economics, University of Copenhagen (Copenhagen, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • M.E. Yaari, “A note on separability and quasi-concavity”,Econometrica 45 (1977) 1183–1186.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.E. Yaari, “Separably concave utilities or the principle of diminishing eagerness to trade”,Journal of Economic Theory 18 (1978) 102–118.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Debreu, G., Koopmans, T.C. Additively decomposed quasiconvex functions. Mathematical Programming 24, 1–38 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01585092

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01585092

Key words

Navigation