Skip to main content
Log in

Correlation polytopes: Their geometry and complexity

  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

A family of polytopes, correlation polytopes, which arise naturally in the theory of probability and propositional logic, is defined. These polytopes are tightly connected to combinatorial problems in the foundations of quantum mechanics, and to the Ising spin model. Correlation polytopes exhibit a great deal of symmetry. Exponential size symmetry groups, which leave the polytope invariant and act transitively on its vertices, are defined. Using the symmetries, a large family of facets is determined. A conjecture concerning the full facet structure of correlation polytopes is formulated (the conjecture, however, implies that NP=co-NP).

Various complexity results are proved. It is shown that deciding membership in a correlation polytope is an NP-complete problem, and deciding facets is probably not even in NP. The relations between the polytope symmetries and its complexity are indicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Irene Polo Blanco & Enrico Rogora

References

  1. J.S. Bell, “On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox”,Physics 1 (1964) 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E.P. Wigner, “On hidden variables and quantum mechanical probabilities,”American Journal of Physics 38 (1970) 1005–1009.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.F. Clauser, M.A. Horne, A. Shimony and R.A. Holt, “Proposed experiment to test local hidden variable theories,”Physical Review Letters 23 (1969) 880–884.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.F. Clauser and M.A. Horne, “Experimental consequences of objective local theories,”Physical Review D 10 (1974) 526–535.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Fine, “Hidden variables, joint probability and Bell inequalities,”Physical Review Letters 48 (1982) 291–295.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Garg and N.D. Mermin, “Farkas lemma and the nature of reality, statistical implications of quantum correlations,”Foundations of Physics 14 (1984) 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. Pitowsky, “The range of quantum probability,”Journal of Mathematical Physics 27 (1986) 1556–1565.

    Google Scholar 

  8. I. Pitowsky,Quantum Probability, Quantum Logic, Lecture Notes in Physics No. 321 (Springer, Berlin, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Kirkpatrick and D. Sherrington,” Infinite-ranged models of spin glasses,”Physical Review B 17 (1978) 4384–4403.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.J. Hopfield, “Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities,” in:Proceedings at the National Academy of Sciences USA 79 (1982) 2554–2558.

    Google Scholar 

  11. F. Barahona, “On the computational complexity of ising spin glass models,”Journal of Physics A 15 (1982) 3241–3253.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Boole,The Laws of Thought (Dover, New York (original edition 1854)).

  13. T. Hailperin, “Best possible inequalities for the probability of a logical function of events,”American Mathematical Monthly 72 (1962) 343–359.

    Google Scholar 

  14. T. Hailperin,Boole's Logic and Probability (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1986, 2nd ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  15. C.E. Bonferroni, “Il calcolo delle assicurazioni su grouppi di teste,”Studi in Onore del Professor S.O. Carboni (Roma, 1936).

  16. K.L. Chung, “On the probability of the occurrence of at leastm events amongn arbitrary events,”Annals of Mathematical Statistics 12 (1941) 328–338.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Fréchet,Les Probabilités Associées a un Système D'événements Compatible et Dépendants (Hermann, Paris,Vol I 1940,Vol II 1943).

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Kounias and J. Marin, “Best linear Bonferroni bounds,”SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics 30 (1976) 307–323.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Hunter, “An upper bound for the probability of a union,”Journal of Applied Probability 13 (1976) 597–603.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Cerasoli, “On the probability of a Boolean polynomial of events,”Discrete Mathematics 44 (1983) 221–227.

    Google Scholar 

  21. W. Maurer, “Bivalent trees and forests or upper bounds for the probability of a union revisited,”Discrete Applied Mathematics 6 (1983) 157–171.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R.M. Karp and C.H. Papadimitriou, “On linear characterization of combinatorial optimization problem,” in:Proceedings of the 21 Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science (1980) pp. 1–9.

  23. L.G. Khacian, “A polynomial algorithm for linear programming,”Dolkady Academie Nauk SSSR 244(5) (1979) 1093–1096.

    Google Scholar 

  24. C.H. Papadimitriou and D. Steiglitz,Combinatorial Optimization, Algorithms and Complexity (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  25. T.J. Schafer, “The complexity of satisfiability problems,” in:Proceedings of the 10th Annual Symposium on Theory of Computing (ACM, New York, 1978) pp. 216–226.

    Google Scholar 

  26. M.R. Garey and D.S. Johnson,Computers and Intractability, A Guide to the Theory of NP completeness (Freeman, New York, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  27. C.H. Papadimitriou and M. Yannakakis, “The complexity of facets (and some facets of complexity),”Journal of Computing System Science 28 (1984) 244–259.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pitowsky, I. Correlation polytopes: Their geometry and complexity. Mathematical Programming 50, 395–414 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01594946

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01594946

Key words

Navigation