Skip to main content
Log in

The prediction of protein secondary structure with a Cascade Correlation Learning Architecture of neural networks

  • Articles
  • Published:
Neural Computing & Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A Cascade Correlation Learning Architecture (CCLA) of neural networks is tested on the task of predicting the secondary structure of proteins. The results are compared with those obtained with Neural Networks (NN) trained with the back-propagation algorithm (BPNN) and generated with genetic algorithms. CCLA proceeds towards the global minimum of the error function more efficiently than BPNN. However, only a slight improvement in the average efficiency value is noticeable (61.82% as compared with 61.61% obtained with BPNN). The values of the three correlation coefficients for the discriminated secondary structures are also rather similar (Ct8,C α ,C β and Ccoil are 0.36, 0.29 and 0.36 with CCLA, and 0.36, 0.31 and 0.35 with BPNN). This indicates that the efficiency of the prediction does not depend upon the training algorithm, and confirms our previous observation that when single sequences are used as input code to the network system, different NN architectures can perform similarly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Qian N, Sejnowski TG. Predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins using neural network models. J Mol Biol 1988; 202: 865–884

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hirst JD, Sternberg JE. Prediction of structural and functional features of proteins and nucleic acid sequences by artificial neural networks. Biochemistry 1992; 31: 7211–7218

    Google Scholar 

  3. Presnell SR, Cohen FE. Artificial neural networks for pattern recognition in biochemical sequences. Ann Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 1993; 22: 283–298

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ. Learning representation by backpropagation errors. Nature 1986; 323: 533–536

    Google Scholar 

  5. Holley HL, Karplus M. Protein secondary structure prediction with a neural network. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1989; 86: 152–156

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pascarella S, Bossa F. PRONET: a microcomputer program for predicting the secondary structure of proteins with a neural network. Comput Aplic Biosci 1989, 5: 319–320

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kneller DG, Cohen FE, Langridge R. Improvements in protein secondary structure prediction by an enhanced neural network. J Mol Biol 1990; 214: 171–182

    Google Scholar 

  8. Muskal SM, Kim SH. Predicting protein secondary structure content. A tandem neural network approach. J Mol Biol 1992; 225: 713–727

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stolorz P, Lapedes A, Xia Y. Predicting protein secondary structure using neural net and statistical methods. J Mol Biol 1992; 225: 363–377

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fariselli P, Compiani M, Casadio R. Predicting secondary structures of membrane proteins with neural networks. Europ Biophys J 1993, 22: 41–51

    Google Scholar 

  11. Compiani M, Fariselli P, Casadio R. Statistical behaviour of perceptrons: the case study of the prediction of protein secondary structures. Int J Neur Sys 1995 (Supp), 6: 195–199

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rost B, Sander C. Prediction protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy. J Mol Biol 1993; 232: 584–599

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rost B, Sander C, Schneider R. Redefining the goals of protein secondary structure prediction. J Mol Biol 1994; 235: 13–26

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rost B, Sander C, Schneider R. PHD: an automatic mail server for protein secondary structure prediction. Comput Applic Biosci 1994; 10: 53–60

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vivarelli F, Giusti G, Villani M, Campanini R, Fariselli P, Compiani M, Casadio R. LGANN: a parallel system combining a local genetic algorithm and neural networks for the prediction of secondary structure of proteins. Comput Applic Biosci 1995; 11: 253–260

    Google Scholar 

  16. Haykin S. Neural Networks. A comprehensive foundation. MacMillan College Pub. Co., New York, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fahlman SE, Lebiere C. The Cascade-correlation learning architecture. Technical Report CMU CS 90-100, Carnegie Mellon University, 1990

  18. Bishop C. Extract calculation of the hessian matrix for the multilayer perceptron. Neural Computation 1992; 4: 494–501

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fahlman SE. Faster learning variations on back-propagation: an empirical study. Proc 1988 Connectionist Models Summer School, Morgan Kaufmann, 1988

  20. Bernstein FC, Koetzle TF, Williams GJB, Meyer EF, Brice MD, Rodgers JR, Kennard O, Shimanouchi T, Tasumi M. The protein data bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structure. J Mol Biol 1977; 112: 535–542

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lipman DJ, Pearson WR. Rapid and sensitive protein similarity searches. Science 1985; 227: 1435–1441

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure. Pattern of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 1983; 22: 2577–2673

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schulz GE, Schirmer RH. Principles of Protein Structure. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  24. Matthews BW. Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochim Biophys Acta 1975; 405: 442–451

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vivarelli, F., Fariselli, P. & Casadio, R. The prediction of protein secondary structure with a Cascade Correlation Learning Architecture of neural networks. Neural Comput & Applic 6, 57–62 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01670152

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01670152

Keywords

Navigation