Skip to main content
Log in

Homomorphisms of symbolic dynamical systems

  • Published:
Mathematical systems theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The densities of finite blocks of symbols can be computed for points in any substitution minimal set arising from a substitution of constant length and also for points in any Sturmian minimal set. It follows from the computations that all Sturmian minimal sets and all substitution minimal sets are strictly ergodic and have topological entropy zero. It also follows that no Sturmian minimal set is the homomorphic image of a substitution minimal set. It can also be shown that no non-trivial substitution minimal set is powerfully (totally) minimal, and it follows that no non-trivial substitution minimal set is the homomorphic image of a Sturmian minimal set.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. L. Adler, A. G. Konheim andM. H. McAndrew, Topological Entropy,Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 114 (1965), 309–319.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Billingsley,Ergodic Theory and Information, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. M. Coven andM. S. Keane, The structure of substitution minimal sets, to appear.

  4. J. L. Doob,Stochastic Processes, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Ellis andW. H. Gottschalk, Homomorphisms of transformation groups,Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 94 (1960), 258–271.

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. H. Gottschalk, Substitution minimal sets,Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 109 (1963), 467–491.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. H. Gottschalk andG. A. Hedlund,Topological Dynamics, Amer. Math. Soc. Colloq. Publ., Vol. 36, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. J. Hahn andY. Katznelson, On the entropy of uniquely ergodic transformations,Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 126 (1967), 335–360.

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. A. Hedlund, Endomorphisms and automorphisms of the shift dynamical system,Math. Systems Theory 3 (1969), 320–375.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. A. Hedlund, Sturmian minimal sets,Amer. J. Math. 66 (1944), 605–620.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Morse andG. A. Hedlund, Symbolic dynamics,Amer. J. Math. 60 (1938), 815–866.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Morse andG. A. Hedlund, Symbolic dynamics II. Sturmian trajectories,Amer. J. Math. 62 (1940), 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. C. Oxtoby, Ergodic sets,Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 58 (1952), 116–136.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. R. Pitt, Some generalizations of the ergodic theorem,Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 38 (1942), 325–343.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Most of the results in this paper were first obtained in the author's doctoral dissertation which was presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Yale University in 1968.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klein, B.G. Homomorphisms of symbolic dynamical systems. Math. Systems Theory 6, 107–122 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01706082

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01706082

Keywords

Navigation