Abstract
A representative system defined onn voters or propositionsi = 1,⋯,n is a functionF: {1,0, -1}n → {1,0, -1} which is monotonic (D ≥ E ⇒ F(D) ≥ F(E)), unanimous (F(1,⋯, 1) = 1), dual (F(-D) = -F(D)), and satisfies a positivity property which says that the set of all non-zero vectors in {1, 0, -1}n for whichF(D) = 0 can be partitioned into two dual subsets each of which has the property that ifD andE are in the subset thenD i+E i > 0 for somei. Representative systems can be defined recursively from the coordinate projectionsS i (D) = D i using sign functions, and in this format they are interpreted as hierarchical voting systems in which outcomes of votes in “lower” levels act as votes in “higher” levels of the system. For each positive integern, μ(n) is defined as the smallest positive integer such that all representative systems defined on {1, 0, -1}n can be characterized byμ(n) or fewer hierarchical levels. The functionμ is nondecreasing inn, unbounded above, and satisfiesμ(n) ≤ n−1 for alln. In addition,μ(n) = n−1 forn ∈ {1, 2, 3, 4}, and it is conjectured thatμ does not continue to grow linearly asn increases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P. C. Fishburn, The theory of representative majority decision,Econometrica 39 (1971), 273–284.
P. C. Fishburn,The Theory of Social Choice, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1973.
H. W. Kuhn andA. W. Tucker (eds.),Linear Inequalities and Related Systems, Annals of Mathematics Studies Number 38, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1956.
Y. Murakami, Formal structure of majority decision,Econometrica 34 (1966), 709–718.
Y. Murakami,Logic and Social Choice, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London; Dover, New York, 1968.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fishburn, P.C. Three-valued representative systems. Math. Systems Theory 9, 265–280 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01735144
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01735144