Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-dimensional texts in a one-dimensional medium

  • Published:
Computers and the Humanities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses one of the tools which may be used for representing texts in machine-readable form, i.e. encoding systems or markup languages. This discussion is at the same time a report on current tendencies in the field. An attempt is made at reconstructing some of the main conceptions of text lying behind these tendencies. It is argued that, although the conceptions of texts and text structures inherent in these tendencies seem to be misguided, text encoding is nevertheless a fruitful approach to the study of texts. Finally, some conclusions are drawn concerning the relevance of this discussion to themes in text linguistics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnard, D., R. Hayter, M. Karababa, G. Logan and J. McFadden. “SGML-Based Markup for Literary Texts: Two Problems and Some Solutions.”Computers and the Humanities, 22, 4 (1988), 265–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Beugrande, Robert and Wolfgang Dressler.Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, J.H.et al. “Markup Systems and the Future of Scholarly Text Processing.”Communications of the ACM, 30, 11 (1987), 933–947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulmas, Florian.The Writing Systems of the World. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeRose, Steveet al. “What is Text, Really?”Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 1 (1990), 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfarb, Charles F. “Introduction to Generalized Markup.” Annex A to ISO 8879–1986. Adapted from “A Generalized Approach to Document Markup,” SIGPLAN Notices, June 1981. The annex does not form an integral part of the International Standard.

  • Goody, Jack.The Interface Between the Written and the Oral. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M.A.K. and Ruqaiya Hasan.Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M.A.K.Spoken and Written Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huitfeldt, Claus and Viggo Rossvær. “The Norwegian Wittgenstein Project Report 1988.” Report Series no. 44. Norwegian Computing Centre for the Humanities, Bergen, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huitfeldt, Claus. “Towards a Machine-Readable Version of Wittgenstein's Nachlaß.” Unpublished working paper (draft), 23, February 1990.

  • Huitfeldt, Claus. “Das Wittgenstein-Archiv der Universität Bergen. Hintergrund und erster Arbeitsbericht.” InMitteilungen aus der Brenner-Archiv. No. 10. Innsbruck, 1991, pp. 93–106.

  • Huitfeldt, Claus. “MECS — A Multi-Element Code System.” Working Papers from the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen, no. 3 (forthcoming, 1992).

  • Ide, Nancy and Michael Sperberg-McQueen. “Encoding Guidelines Meeting.”ACH Newsletter, 9, 4 (1987), 2, 4, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 8879-1986. “Information Processing — Text and Office Systems Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML).” International Organization for Standardization, ISO 8879-1986.

  • Kraft, Herbert.Editionsphilologie. Darmstadt: Wissentschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, Walter J. “Writing is a Technology that Restructures Thought.” InThe Written Word. Ed. Gerd Baumann. Oxford University Press, 1986.

  • Renear, Allen H., David G. Durand and Elli Mylonas. “Overlapping Hierarchies of Text Objects: Refining our Notion of What Text Really Is.” InConference Abstracts and Programme. ALLC-ACH Conference, Oxford, April 1992, pp. 200–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinding-Larsen, Henrik. “Information Technology and the Externalization of Knowledge.” InArtificial Intelligence and Language. Ed. Sinding-Larsen. Oslo: Tano, 1988a, pp. 77–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinding-Larsen, Henrik. “Notation and Music: The History of a Tool of Description and its Domain to be Described.” InArtificial Intelligence and Language. Ed. Sinding-Larsen. Oslo: Tano, 1988b, pp. 90–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperberg-McQueen, Michael. “Text in the Electronic Age: Textual Study and Text Encoding, with Examples from Medieval Texts.”Literary and Linguistic Computing, 6, 1 (1991) 34–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • TEI EDP1. “Design Principles for Text Encoding Guidelines.” Text Encoding Initiative, document number TEI EDP1, 18.07.89.

  • TEI P1.Guidelines for the Encoding and Interchange of Machine-Readable Texts. Ed. C.M. Sperberg-McQueen and Lou Burnard. Draft Version 1.1. Chicago and Oxford, November 1990.

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig.Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routlege and Kegan Paul, 1922.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Claus Huitfeldt studied philosophy at the University of Trondheim, writing his dissertation on the nature of transcendental arguments. He then worked for several years at the Norwegian Computing Centre for the Humanities, at the Norwegian Wittgenstein Project, and as Research Fellow in philosophy, before becoming Director of the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen. He has published a number of papers on text encoding.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huitfeldt, C. Multi-dimensional texts in a one-dimensional medium. Comput Hum 28, 235–241 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01830270

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01830270

Key words

Navigation