Skip to main content
Log in

The relevance of ‘work-practice’ for design

  • Published:
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Designers are increasingly being urged to take account of the situated and contingent organisation of the work that their systems are to support or automate. Within CSCW the concept of work-practice is a much used token for the organisation of work. This paper develops the debate about the position of work-practice in design by recognising that it is an ambiguous concept in sociology that is used to refer to different orders to work organisation. It is argued that as such it is as likely to mask the situated and contingent organisation of work as it is to make it visible. In order to fully realise the radicalisation of design portended by the deployment of the concept of work-practice and in order to make visible thein situ organisation of work it is argued that full and due weight has to be placed upon grounding the concept inanalytic explications of the interactional ordering of work. This stands in contrast to grounding work-practice in the formalisms of work emanating from theoretical debates about work in a capitalist economic/social structure; documentations of work; the narratives of workers, managers, and purchasers; dialogues with users, and mere observations of work. Two studies are invoked to substantiate this argument, one involving a sales ordering and invoicing system, the other a crime reporting system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackroyd, S., Harper, R., Huges, J.A., Shapiro, D., and Soothil, K. (1992):New Technology and Practical Police Work. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, J., Button, G., and Sharrock, W.W. (1995): Workflow From Within and Without: Technology and Cooperative Work on the Print Industry Shopfloor. InProceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, eds. H. Harmolin, Y. Sundblad and K. Schmidt. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Button, G. and Harper, R. (1993): Taking The Organisation Into Accounts. InTechnology in Working Order: Studies of Work, Interaction and Technology, ed. G. Button, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel H. (ed.) (1986).Tthnomethodological Studies of Work. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenbaum, J. and Kyng, M. (eds) (1991):Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, E. (1986):The Ethnomethodological Foundations of Mathematics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M., Livingstone, E. and Garfinkel, H. (1983): Temporal Order in Laboratory Work. InScience Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science. eds. K.D. Knorr-Cetina and M. Mulkay. London: Sage, pp. 205–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharrock, W.W. and Anderson, R.J.A. (1982): On the Demise of the Native: Some Observations on and a Proposal For Ethnography.Human Studies, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 119–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharrock, W.W. and Button, G. (1991): Social Action In Real Time. InEthnomethodology and The Human Sciences, ed. G. Button. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. (1987):Plans and Situated Action: The Problem of Human-Computer Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. (1995): Making Work Visible.Communications of the ACM, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 56–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We are grateful to Bob Anderson and Kjeld Schmidt for their comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Button, G., Harper, R. The relevance of ‘work-practice’ for design. Comput Supported Coop Work 4, 263–280 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01846695

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01846695

Key words

Navigation