Skip to main content
Log in

British otorhinolaryngological research. An analysis of publication trends

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

1081 otorhinolaryngological articles originating from departments in the British Isles, published in 8 leading English language speciality journals from 1985–1989 were analysed to determine author and content trends. Articles were classified as clinical investigative, laboratory based, case report or review/editorial. The institution of origin, total number of authors and identity of the first three were recorded. There is evidence of an increase in published British otolaryngological research and in the extent of researcher collaboration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Boxenbaum, F. Pivinski, S.J. Ruberg, Publication rates of pharmaceutical scientists: application of the waring distribution,Drug Metabolism Review, 18 (1987) 553–571.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W.J. Broad, The publishing game getting more for less,Science, 211 (1981) 1137–1139.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Carnie, B. Kumar, An analysis of thirty years of contributions to the British anaesthetic literature (1953–82),British Journal of Anaesthesia, 56 (1984) 1171–1174.

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Chew, Coauthorship in radiology journals,American Journal of Radiology, 150 (1988) 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.E. Cohen, Publication rate as a function of laboratory size in a biomedical research institution,Scientometrics, 2 (1980) 35–52.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Department of clinical epidemiology and biostatistics, McMaster University, Clinical disagreement: I. How often it occurs and why,Canadian Medical Association Journal, 123 (1980) 499–504.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R.H. Fletcher, S.W. Fletcher, Clinical research in general medical journals,New England Journal of Medicine, 301 (1979) 180–183.

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. Fye, Medical authorship traditions trends and tribulations,Annals of Internal Medicine, 113 (1990) 317–325.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. Garfield (Ed.), SCI Journal Citation Reports. A Bibliometric Analysis of Science Journals in the ISI Database Science Citation Index, 1988 annual, Institute for Scientific Information Inc., 19, Philadelphia, 1989, 375.

  10. E. Garfield (Ed.) SCI Science Citation Index 1985–1989, five year cumulation, Institute for Scientific Information Inc., Philadelphia.

  11. E. Garfield (Ed.) Sci Science Citation Index 1990, annual, Institute for Scientific Information Inc., Philadelphia.

  12. L.L. Hargens, Variation in journal peer review systems,Journal of the American Medical Association, 263 (1990) 1348–52.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S.M. Lawani, Correlates of quality in research,Scientometrics, 9 (1986) 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R.M. Rosenfeld, Clinical research in otolaryngology journals,Archives of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 117 (1990) 164–170.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A.C. Weller, Editorial peer review in US medical journals,Journal of the American Medical Association, 263 (1990) 1344–47.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hussain, S.S.M., Nunez, D.A. British otorhinolaryngological research. An analysis of publication trends. Scientometrics 26, 255–262 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016218

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016218

Keywords

Navigation