Skip to main content
Log in

Gaps in “gaps in technology” and other innovation inventories

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A 1970 report of the Organization for Economic Corporation and Development indicated that Canada ranked last on a list of about 10 industrialized counties in terms of innovations. This ranking has been used to support frequently held contention that Canada is technologically uninnovative. However, the OECD list had no criteria for the inclusion or exclusion of a particular innovation. The OECD data has areas of difference with other independent measures of innovation. A comparison is made to a related study by Gellman Associates. This latter study shows that the Canadian position is not as poor as indicated by the OECD list.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gaps in Technology, Analytical Report, OECD, Paris, 1970. Table 1 is adapted from “A Factor for Progress: Technological Innovation”,OECD Observer, 54 (1971) 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A few references are as follows: Report of the Senate Special Committee on Science Policy, Vol. 1, Queen's Printer, Ottawa, 1970, p. 134–5. Foreign Direct Investment in Canada. Information Canada, Ottawa, 1972 p. 118–120. Also known as the Grey Report. P. L. BOURGAULT, Innovation and the Structure of Canadian Industry, Science Council of Canada, Ottawa, 1972, p. 37–39. (Special Study No. 23). A. J. CORDELL, J. GILMOUR, The Role and Function of Government Laboratories and the Transfer of Technology of the Manufacturing Sector. Science Council of Canada, Ottawa, 1976. (Background Study No. 35). M. J. PEACOCKE, The State of R & D in Canada,Canadian Research and Development, 10 (1977) No. 1, 11–15.

  3. J. J. BROWN,Ideas in Exile, McClelland and Stewart, Toronto, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Indicators of International Trends in Technological Innovation. Gellman Research Associates, Jenkintown, Pa., 1976.

  5. E. DENISON,Why Growth Rates Differ, Brookings Institution, Washington, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. SCHMOOKLER,Invention and Economic Growth, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Science Indicators 1974. National Science Foundation, Washington, 1975.

  8. Atlantic Institute,The Technology Gap: U. S. and Europe, Praeger, New York, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. CARLSON, International Transmission of Information and the Busines Firm,Annals of the American Academy of Political Science, 412 (1974) 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  10. O. KECK, West German science policy since the early 1960's: trends and objectives,Research Policy, 5 (1976) No. 1, 116–157.

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. PAVITT, W. WALKER, Government policies toward industrial innovation: a review,Research Policy, 5 (1976) No. 1, 11–97.

    Google Scholar 

  12. N. ROSENBERG, Problems in the economist's conceptualization of technological innovation,History of Political Economy, 7 (1975) No. 4, 456–481.

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. OHLSSON, On unit prices and their use in the analysis of the international specialization pattern within heterogeneous industries,Journal of Inernational Economics, 4 (1974) 275–293.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. A. KOHR, Canadian Innovations 1945–1963, inCanada Year Book, Queen's Printer, Ottawa, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. NOSTBAKKEN, J. HUMPHREY,The Canadian Inventions Book, Greey de Pencier Publications, Toronto, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Science Indicators 1974. National Science Board, Washington, D. C., 1975.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Inhaber, H., Lipsett, M.S. Gaps in “gaps in technology” and other innovation inventories. Scientometrics 1, 405–417 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016659

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016659

Keywords

Navigation