Abstract
The acceptance rate of articles which are collaboratively authored tends to be higher than that for single-authored papers, thereby suggesting a generally positive relationship between collaboration and quality. The analysis of ten-year citation rates of 270 randomly selected articles in three applied fields likewise shows a similar relationship, with somewhat higher citation frequencies for multi-authored papers than for single-authored ones. The relationships persist whether self-citations are included or excluded. However, these differences are not statistically significant for articles in clinical psychology or in educational measurement. Only multi-authored articles in management science show a statistically significant higher citation rate. Other aspects of the collaborative process and effects are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. OVER, Collaborative research and publication in psychology,American Psychologist, 37 (1982) 996.
D. DE SOLLA PRICE,Little Science, Big Science, New York, Columbia University Press, 1963.
H. A. ZUCKERMAN, R. K. MERTON Age, aging, and age structure in science, Ch. 22 in: R. K. MERTON,The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1973.
D. deB. BEAVER, R. ROSEN, Studies in scientific collaboration: Part I, The professional origins of scientific co-authorship,Scientometrics, 1 (1978) 65.
M. F. FOX, C. A. FAVER, The process of collaboration in scholarly research,Scholarly Publishing, 13 (1982) 327.
M. F. FOX, C. A. FAVER, Independence and cooperation in research: The motivations and costs of collaboration,Journal of Higher Education, 55 (1984) 347.
A. G. HEFFNER, Funded research, multiple authorship, and subauthorship collaboration in four disciplines,Scientometrics, 3 (1981) 5.
N. PATEL, Quantitative and collaborative trends in American sociological research,American Sociologist, 7 (1972) 5.
H. A. ZUCKERMAN, Patterns of name ordering among authors of scientific papers,American Journal of Sociology, 74 (1968) 276.
O. WARREN HANGSTROM,The Scientific Community, Carbondale, Southern Illinois University Press, 1965.
S. M. LAWANI, A. E. BAYER, Validity of citation criteria for assessing the influence of scientific publications: New evidence with peer assessment,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34 (1983) 59.
A. E. BAYER, A bibliometric analysis of marriage and family literature,Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44 (1982) 527.
M. D. GORDON, A critical assessment of inferred relations between multiple authorship, scientific collaboration, the production of papers and their acceptance for publication,Scientometrics, 2 (1980) 193.
S PRESSER, Collaboration and the quality of research,Social Studies of Science, 10 (1980) 95.
M. ORAMANER, Collaboration and impact: The career of multi-authored publications,Social Science Information, 14 (1975) 147.
D. LINDSEY,The Scientific Publication System in Social Science, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1978.
D. KOULAK, H. J. KESELMAN, Ratings of psychology journals by members of the American Psychological Association,American Psychologist, 30 (1975) 1049.
D. E. DURAND, Citation count analysis of behavioral science journals in influencial management literature,Academy of Management Journal, 17 (1974) 579.
T. S. LUCE, D. M. JOHNSON, Rating of educational and psychological journals,Educational Research, 7 (1978) 8.
J. R. COLE, S. COLE,Social Stratification in Science, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1973.
E. GARFIELD,Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities, New York, Wiley, 1979.
R. K. MERTON,The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1973.
A. E. BAYER, J. K. FOLGER, Some correlates of a citation measure of productivity in science,Sociology of Education, 39 (1966) 381.
C. R. MYERS, Journal citations and scientific eminence in contemporary psychology,American Psychologist, 25 (1970) 1041.
R. C. ANDERSON, F. NARIN, P. McALLISTER, Publication ratings versus peer ratings of universities,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 29 (1978) 91.
M. S. ENDLER, J. P. RUSHTON, H. L. ROEDIGER, Productivity and scholarly impact (citations) of British, Canadian, and U. S. departments of psychology (1975),American Psychologist, 33 (1978) 1064.
M. J. WHITE, K. G. WHITE, Citation analysis of psychology journals,American Psychologist 32 (1977) 301.
T. ROCHE, D. L. SMITH, Frequency of citations as criterion for the ranking of departments, journals, and individuals,Sociological Inquiry, 48 (1978) 49.
C. W. SCHAFFER, Citation analysis,Bioscience, 27 (1977) 442.
S. M. LAWANI, Citation analysis and the quality of scientific productivity,Bioscience, 27 (1977) 26.
A. J. MEADOWS, J. C. O'CONNER, Bibliographic statistics as a guide to growth points in science,Science Studies, 1 (1975) 95.
C. G. ROLAND, R. A. KIRKPATRICK, Time lapse between hypothesis and publication in the medical sciences,New England Journal of Medicine, 292 (1975) 1273.
R. TAGLIACOZZO, Self-citations in scientific literature,Journal of Documentation, 33 (1977) 251.
H. J. WALBERG, et al., Exceptional performance,Review of Educational Research, 54 (1983) 87.
N. J. GORDON, et al., Productivity and citations of educational research: Using Educational Psychology as the data base,Educational Researcher, 13 (1984) 14.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smart, J.C., Bayer, A.E. Author collaboration and impact: A note on citation rates of single and multiple authored articles. Scientometrics 10, 297–305 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016776
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016776