Skip to main content
Log in

The state of biomedical radiation research as demonstrated by publications, funding and manpower activity: An analytical example of utilizing on-line medical informatics

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The biomedical radiation research community has important goals. Research, risk assessment, preventative health and safety are some of its responsibilities. It is surprising that radiation research is growing only at 70% of the yearly Medline database. Funding is predictably underfunded (89% of expected) given its high percentage of research with animals and cells (127% (Medline = 100%)) vs. radiation's lower percentage of human studies (60%). Manpower studies demonstrate 4500 Ph. D.'s since 1960. 50% are in physics, 17% chemistry, and 11% biology. Biochemistry, pharmacology, microbiology, genetics, pathology and psychology contribute less than 3%. These indicators show activity in radiation research, yet deficits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. W. Davis, J. Cox, J. Diamond, D. Flynn, F. Halberg, W. Moss, The manpower crisis facing radiation oncology,International Journal Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 12 (1986) 1873–1878.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Garfield, Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation,Science, 178 (1972) 471–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. Garfield, The journals pathologist's write and the journals pathologists cite,Pathology Annual, 11 (1976) 335–51.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Garfield, Which medical journals have the greatest impact.,Annals of Internal Medicine, 105 (1976) 313–20.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. Garfield,Science Citation Index, 1975–1986. ISI Press, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grants of the Public Health Service, Govt. Print, Wash., D. C., 1975–1980.

  7. R. B. Haynes, K. A. McKibbon, D. Fitzgerald, et al., How to keep up with the medical literature: II. Deciding which journals to read regularly,Annals of Internal Medicine, 105 (1986) 309–12.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Library Operations,Medical Subject Heading, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  9. National Science Board,Science Indicators, 1976, National Science Foundation, Washington, D. C., 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  10. National Academy of Sciences,Federal Research on the Biological and Health Effects of Ionizing Radiation, National Academy Press, Washington, D. C., 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Rubin, The emergence of radiation oncology as a distinct medical specialty,International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 11 (1985) 1247–1270.

    Google Scholar 

  12. W. H. Shapley, D. I. Phillips,Research & Development A. A. A. S. Report IV, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Wash., D. C., 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. Zuckerman,Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States, Free Press, Macmillan Publishing, New York, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. K. Macleod, W. R. Hendee, M. R. Schwarcz (Eds)JAMA, 1986, 632–634.

  15. A. Upton, Low level radiation exposure,Scientific American, 246 (1982) 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. L. Brent, Radiation Teratology, In:Handbook of Teratology,J. G. Wilson,F. C. Fraser (Eds), Plenum Press NY, 1977, pp. 153–224.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steinberg, J.J. The state of biomedical radiation research as demonstrated by publications, funding and manpower activity: An analytical example of utilizing on-line medical informatics. Scientometrics 27, 283–294 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016943

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016943

Keywords

Navigation