Abstract
The inadequacies of citation analysis-based quatitative techniques in the context of developing countries owe their origins to the rather small size of most peripheral country scientific enterprises, the poor coverage of Third World journals in bibliographic databases, (and in particularSCI), the cognitive limitations of citation analysis pointed out by microsociologists, and the non-normative nature of the scientific enterprise in these countries. Much of peripheral science is derivative and imitative of science done in the centre, rather than ‘original’ or ‘path-breaking’, and there is hardly any indigenous ‘scientific community’. And yet, citation analysis-based quantitative measures can be applied to characterise different aspects of peripheral science. These techniques assume great importance, especially in view of the massive inadequacies of the peer review process prevailing in these countries. The application of such citation-based quantification to units of different levels of aggregation such as a journal, an institution and a country as a whole has been demonstrated taking India as the example. Our results show that levels of funding have no correlation with the quality or international citation impact of the literature output resulting from a project. Almost all Indian journals have a very low impact on world literature, and the relatively better performance ofJournal of Astrophysics and Astronomy (and Indian astronomical research in general) owes it to favourable factors, both social and cognitive.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. J. MORAVCSIK, J. M. ZIMAN, Paradisia and dominatia: Science and the developing world,Foreign Affairs, 53 (July 1975) 699–724.
D. J. BAINES, Use of indicators for measurement of qualitative aspects of science, inScience and Technology Indicators for Development, edited by S. PRUTHI, P. S. NAGPAUL (NISTADS, New Delhi), 1987, pp. 65–80.
L. VELHO, The meaning of citation in the context of a scientifically peripheral country,Scientometrics, 9 (1986) 71–89.
K. MANORAMA, A. BHUTIANI, Strengthening the coverage of Indian scientific journals,Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 47 (1988) 23–27.
L. VELHO, J. KRIGE, Publication and citation practices of Brazilian agricultural scientists,Social Studies of Science, 14 (1984) 45.
D. EDGE, Quantitative measures of communication in science: A critical review,History of Science, 17 (1979) 102–134.
D. EDGE, Why I am not a cocitationist,4S Newsletter, 2 (1977) 13–19.
D. E. CHUBIN, Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool?,Scientometrics, 3 (1980) 91–92.
D. E. CHUBIN, The use of Science Citation Index in sociology,American Sociologist, 8 (1973) 187–191.
D. E. CHUBIN, S. D. MOITRA, Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting?Social Studies of Science, 5 (1975) 423–441.
G. N. GILBERT, Referencing as persuasion,Social Studies of Science, 7 (1977) 113–122.
R. D. WHITLEY, Communication nets in science: Status and citation patterns in animal physiology,Sociological Review, 17 (1969) 219–233.
M. MULKAY, Methodology in the sociology of science: Some reflections on the study of radio astronomy,Social Science Information, 13 (1974) 107–119.
M. MULKAY, Sociology of the scientific research community, in:Science, Technology and Society: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective, edited by I. SPIGEL-ROSING, D. De SOLLA PRICE, Sage, London, 1977, pp. 93–148.
K. O. MAY, Abuses of citation indexing,Science, 156 (1967) 890–892.
S. AARONSON, The footnotes of science,Mosaic, 6 (2) (1975) 22–27.
S. D. GOTTFREDSON, W. D. GARVEY, Review of ‘Citation Indexing’ by Eugene Garfield,Behavioral and Social Sciences Librarian, 1 (1980) 289–294.
B. CRONIN,The Citation Process, Taylor Graham, London, 1984.
D. DIEKS, H. CHANG, Differences in impact of scientific publications: Some indices derived from a citation analysis,Social Studies of Science, 6 (1976) 247–267.
S. ARUNACHALAM, S. MARKANDAY, Science in the middle-level countries: A bibliometric analysis of scientific journals of Australia, Canada, India and Israel,Journal of Information Science, 3 (1981) 13–26.
V. SHIVA, J. BANDYOPADHYAY, The large and fragile community of scientists in India,Minerva, 18 (1980) 575–594.
R. RAMASUBBAN, BHANWAR SINGH, The orientation of the public sciences in a post-colonial society: The experience of India, in:The Social Direction of the Public Sciences. The Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, Vol. XI, edited by S. BLUME, J. BUNDERS, L. LEYDESDORFF, R. WHITLEY, D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1987, pp. 163–191.
A. AHMAD, Scientific community in India: An illusive trademark,Bulletin of Science, Bangalore, 1 (April–May 1985) 18–25.
“Should we close down our research journals?” An unsigned editorial,Physics News, September 1987.
P. BALARAM, Good science: How to spot it and support it,Bulletin of Sciences, Bangalore, 3 (No. 3) (Sept–Oct 1987) 20–21.
T. BRAUN, W. GLÄNZEL, A. SCHUBERT, One more version of the facts and figures on publication output and relative citation impact of 107 countries, 1978–1980,Scientometrics, 11 (1987) 9–15.
S. ARUNACHALAM, K. MANORAMA, How do journals on the periphery compare with mainstream scientific journals?Scientometrics, 14 (1988) 83–95.
S. ARUNACHALAM, M. K. D. RAO, Scientometric profile of a physics laboratory, Report No. NPL-86-I.3-0180, National Physical Laboratory, New Delhi, 1986.
E. GARFIELD, How to use citation analysis for faculty evaluations, and when is it relevant, Parts 1 & 2,Essays of an Information Scientist, 6 (1983) 354–372.
Gourman Report. A hating of graduate and professional programs in American and International Universities, 4th revised edition, J. GOURMAN (Ed.), 1987.
THES Peer Review, Times Higher Education Supplement, Dec. 3, 1982; Aug. 5, 1983; Jan. 20, 1984; Feb. 8, 1985; Dec. 13, 1985.
S. ARUNACHALAM, K. MANORAMA, M. K. D. RAO, Profiles of Two Indian academic physics laboratories, paper presented at the Leiden Workshop on Science Indicators, November 14–15, 1988.
J. D. FRAME, A. N. SPRAGUE, Indicators of scientific and technological efforts in the Middle East and North Africa, Computer Horizons, Inc., Washington, D. C., 1978.
S. ARUNACHALAM, S. K. RASTOGI, P. S.SHANKAR, Electrochemical research in India —A citation study,Proceedings of the Seminar on Primary Communication in Science and Technology in India, December 1978, PID, New Delhi, 169–173.
S. ARUNACHALAM, S. K. RASTOGI, P. S.SHANKAR, , Impact of Indian research in reproductive endocrinology on world literature,Proceedings of the Seminar on Primary Communication in Science and Technology in India, December 1978. PID, New Delhi, 205–210.
S. ARUNACHALAM, U. N. SINGH, Publication and citation patterns in the literature of a high metabolism area: The case of superconductivity in 1970,Journal Information Sciences 8 (1984) 93–102.
S. ARUNACHALAM, U. N. SINGH, Sophisticated science in a small country: A scientometric analysis of superconductivity research in Israel,Journal of Information Science, 10 (1985) 165–171.
Y. M. RABKIN, H. INHABER, Science on the periphery: A citation study of three less developed countries,Scientometrics, 1 (1979) 261–274.
E. GARFIELD, Third World research, parts 1 and 2,Current Contents, 23 (No. 33, 34) (August 1983).
T. BRAUN, W. GLÄNZEL, A. SCHUBERT,Scientometric Indicators, A 32-country Comparative Evaluation of Publishing Performance and Citation Impact, World Scientific, Singapore, 1985.
S. ARUNACHALAM, K. C. GARG, Science on the periphery — A scientometric analysis of science in the ASEAN countries,Journal of Information Science, 12 (1986) 105–117.
C. GANZ, R. C. STOWE, Assessing the scientific strength of Chile, Preprint (February 1988).
H. R. COWARD, A bibliometric assessment of Indian science, Indian scientific strengths: Selected opportunities for Indo-US cooperation,Proceedings of a National Science Foundation Workshop, Washington D. C., Spring 1987.
S. ARUNACHALAM, M. K. D. RAO, P. K. SHRIVASTAVA, Physics research in Israel — A preliminary bibliometric analysis,Journal of Information Science, 8 (1984) 185–195.
J. D. FRAME, Problems in the use of literature-based S&T indicators in developing countries, inScience and Technology Indicators for Development, edited by H. MORITA-LOU, West View Press, Boulder Colorado, 1985, 117–122.
ABDUS SALAM, Science, scientific community and development,Bulletin of Sciences, Bangalore, 1 (No. 6) (Apr–May 1985) 4–11.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arunachalam, S., Manorama, K. Are citation-based quantitative techniques adequate for measuring science on the periphery?. Scientometrics 15, 393–408 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017061
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017061