Skip to main content
Log in

Bridging the gaps: Conceptual discussions on informetrics

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we discuss the possible gaps between several subdisciplines in informetrics and between informetrics and other-metrics disciplines such as econometrics, sociometrics and so on. It is argued that in all these disciplines, common models exist which describe the main points of interest. We also show that many concrete problems in these disciplines can be formulated in the same way and hence have similar solutions. We can conclude with the statement that the possible gaps between these disciplines are smaller than what many researchers in these different areas may feel and hence that many research projects could be set up in a wider framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A. Bookstein (1992), Theoretical properties of the informetric distributions: some open questions. In:Informetrics-91. Selected papers from the third International Conference on Informetrics, Bangalore (India),I. K. R. Rao (Ed.), 1991, p. 17–35.

  • S. C. Bradford (1934), Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering, 137, p. 85–86. Reprinted in:Collection Management, 1, p. 95–103 (1976–1977). Also reprinted in:Journal of Information Science, 10, 148 (facsimile of the first page) and 176–180 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. K. Buckland, A. Hindle, G. P. M. Walker (1975), Methodological problems in assessing the overlap between bibliographical files and library holdings.Information Processing and Management, 11, 89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. P. Carpenter (1979), Similarity of Pratt's measure of class concentration to the Gini index.Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 30, 108–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. De Solla Price (1976), A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes.Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27, 292–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Egghe (1989),The duality of informetric systems with applications to the empirical laws. Ph. D. thesis. The City University, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Egghe (1993a), On the influence of growth on obsolescence.Scientometrics, 27(2), 195–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Egghe (1994), A theory of continuous rates and applications to the theory of growth and obsolescence rates.Information processing and Management, 30(2), 279–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Egghe (1993b), Consequences of Lotka's law in the case of fractional counting of authorship and of first author counts.Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 18(9), 63–77.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • L. Egghe, I. K. Ravichandra Rao (1992a), Citation age data and the obsolescence function: Fits and explanations.Information Processing and Management, 28(2), 201–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Egghe, I. K. Ravichandra Rao (1992b), Classification of growth models based on growth rates and its applications.Scientometrics, 25(1), 5–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Egghe, R. Rousseau (1990),Introduction to Informetrics. Quantitative Methods in Library, Documentation and Information Science. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Gini (1909), Il diverso accrescimento delle classi sociali e la concentrazione della richezza.Giornale degli Economisti, serie 11, 37.

  • Y. Ijiri, H. A. Simon (1977),Skew Distributions and the Sizes of Business Firms. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. G. Kilgour (1968), Retrieval of single entries from a computerized library catalog file.Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science, 5, 133–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. J. Lotka (1926), The frequency distribution of scientific productivity.Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16, 317–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Mandelbrot (1977),The Fractal Geometry of Nature. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Pareto (1895), La legge della domando.Giornale degli Economisti, ann. 12, 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. D. Pratt (1977), A measure of class concentration in bibliometrics.Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 28, 285–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Rousseau (1992a),Concentration and diversity in informetrics research. Doctorate thesis, University of Antwerp.

  • R. Rousseau (1992b), Category theory and informetrics: information production processes.Scientometrics, 25 (1), 77–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Rousseau, P. Van Hecke (1993), Introduction of a species does not necessarily increase diversity.Coenoses, 8 (1), 39–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. E. Shannon, W. Weaver (1949),The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. K. Zipf (1949),Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. Addison-Wesley, Cambridge. Reprinted by Hafner, New York (1965).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Permanent address.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Egghe, L. Bridging the gaps: Conceptual discussions on informetrics. Scientometrics 30, 35–47 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017211

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017211

Keywords

Navigation