Abstract
A sample was selected fromThe Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society of London to examine the development of collaboration in scientific research from 1901–1991. The variables under study were: changes with time, as reflected in the 19 years sampled; the number of collaborative papers, which were subdivided by number of authors, type of collaboration, and the number of unique departmental subject titles; and the number of authors involved in producing collaborative papers, in which the proportion and the mean number of authors per paper were computed according to type of collaboration. It was found that, while the proportion of collaborative papers fluctuated over the years, the number corresponded to an exponential increase over time. The collaboration in the first half of the century was sporadic but grew rapidly in the second half, especially the collaboration involving many authors from different institutions and countries in the production of a publication. The trend toward interdisciplinarity has become pronounced since the 1960s. The phenomenon was found to be associated with the average number of authors per interdisciplinary paper and the type of collaboration. The limitations of the study are indicated and future studies are suggested.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D. Price,Little Science, Big Science. New York, Columbia University Press, 1963, pp. 87–89.
B. Stefaniak, Individual and multiple authorship of papers in chemistry and physics,Scientometrics, 4 (1982) 331–337.
B. S. Maheswarappa, A. Vinutha, Collaborative research in genetics,International Library Review, 21 (1989) No. 2, 173–176.
M. Yitzhaki, D. Ben-Tamar, Multiple authorship in biochemistry and other fields; A case study of the Journal of Biological Chemistry throughout 1905–1988, In:Informetrics 89/90,L. Egghe,R. Rousseau (Eds) Amsterdam, New York, Elsevier, 1990, pp. 373–389.
I. Ajiferuke, A probabilistic model for the distribution of authorship,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42 (1991) No. 4, 279–289.
D. De B. Beaver, R. Rosen, Studies in scientific collaboration. I. The professional origins of scientific coauthorship,Scientometrics, 1 (1978) 65–84; II. Scientific coauthorship, research productivity, and visibility in the French scientific elite,Scientometrics, 1 (1979) 133–149; III. Professionalization and the natural history of modern scientific coauthorship,Scientometrics, 1 (1979) 231–245.
A. J. Meadows, Scientific collaboration and status, In:Communications in Science, London, Butterworths, 1974. pp. 172–206.
M. L. Pao, Co-authorship and productivity, In:Communicating Information: Proceedings of 43rd ASIS Annual Meeting, 1980, Vol. 17, Anaheim, California, Oct. 5–10, 1980. ed. byA. R. Benefeld, E. J. Kazlauskas, New York, Knowledge Industry Publications, Inc., 1980, pp. 279–281.
M. L. Pao, Global and local collaborators: a study of scientific collaboration,Information Processing and Management, 28 (1992) No. 1, 99–109.
E. L. Logan, W. M. Shaw, Jr., An investigation of the coauthor graph,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 38 (1987) No. 4, 262–268.
N. Pravdic, V. Oluic-Vukovic, Dual approach to multiple authorship in the study of collaboration/scientific output relationship,Scientometrics, 10 (1986) 259–280.
S. M. Lawani, Quality, Collaboration and Citations in Cancer Research: A Bibliometric Study, Ph. D. dissertation. The Florida State University, 1980, p. 297.
W. Hirsch, J. F. Singleton, Research support, multiple authorship, and publications in sociological journals, 1936–1964, Unpublished paper, Purdue University, 1964.
N. Patel, Collaboration in the professional growth of American sociology,Social Science Information, 12 (1973) No. 6, 77–92.
Beaver, Rosen,op. cit. Studies in scientific collaboration. I. The professional origins of scientific coauthorship,Scientometrics, 1 (1978) 65–84; II. Scientific coauthorship, research productivity, and visibility in the French scientific elite,Scientometrics, 1 (1979) 133–149; III. Professionalization and the natural history of modern scientific coauthorship,Scientometrics, 1 (1979) 231–245.
Pao,op. cit..
A. G. Heffner, Funded research, multiple authorship, and subauthorship collaboration in four disciplines,Scientometrics, 3 (1981) 5–12.
K. Subramanyam, Biblimetric studies of research collaboration: a review,Journal of Information Science, 6 (1983) No. 1, 33–38.
J. D. Frame, M. P. Carpenter, International research collaboration,Social Studies of Science, 9 (1979) No. 4, 481–497.
A. Schubert, T. Braun, International collaboration in the sciences 1981–1985,Scientometrics, 19 (1990) 3–10.
N. Narvaez-Berthelemot, L. P. Frogoletto, J. F. Miquel, International scientific collaboration in Latin America, In:Les indicateurs de science pour les pais en developpement, ed. byR. Arvanitis, J. Grillard, Paris, Institut Francais de Recherche Scientifique pour le Developpement en Cooperation, 1992, pp. 333–356.
Annual Report 1991, London, The royal Society, 1991.
Meadows,op. cit.Scientific collaboration and status, In:Communications in Science, London, Butterworths, 1974. pp. 172–206.
Annual Report 1990, London, The Royal Society, 1990, p. 8.
F. W. Lancaster, S. Abdullah, Science and politics: some bibliometric analyses, In:Les indicateurs de science pour les pais en developpement, ed. byR. Arvanitis, J. Grillard, Paris, Institut Francais de Recherche Scientifique pour le Developpement en Cooperation, 1992, pp. 319–332.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qin, J. An investigation of research collaboration in the sciences through the philosophical transactions 1901–1991. Scientometrics 29, 219–238 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017974
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017974