Skip to main content
Log in

Clustering the science citation index using co-citations. II. Mapping science

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous attempts to map science using the co-citation clustering methodology are reviewed, and their shortcomings analyzed. Two enhancements of the methodology presented in Part I of the paper-fractional citation counting and variable level clustering—are briefly described and a third enhancement, the iterative clustering of clusters, is introduced. When combined, these three techniques improve our ability to generate comprehensive and representative mappings of science across the multidisciplinaryScience Citation Index (SCI) data base. Results of a four step analysis of the 1979SCI are presented, and the resulting map at the fourth iteration is described in detail. The map shows a tightly integrated network of approximate disciplinary regions, unique in that for the first time links between mathematics and biomedical science have brought about a closure of the previously linear arrangement of disciplines. Disciplinary balance between biomedical and physical science has improved, and the appearance of less cited subject areas, such as mathematics and applied science, makes this map the most comprehensive one yet produced by the co-citation methodology. Remaining problems and goals for future work are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. DE SOLLA PRICE, The Science of Scientists,Medical Opinion and Review 1, No. 10 (1966) 95.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. DE SOLLA PRICE, The Citation Cycle, in:Key Papers in Information Science, B. C. GRIFFITH, (Ed.), Knowledge Industry Publications, White Plains NY, 1980, p. 195–210.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. DE SOLLA PRICE, D. DE B. BEAVER, Collaboration in an Invisible College,American Psychologist, 21, No. 11 (1966) 1011.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. SMALL, E. SWEENEY, Clustering theScience Citation Index ® using co-citations. Part I. A comparison of methods,Scientometrics, 7 (1985) 391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. H. SMALL, B. C. GRIFFITH, The structure of scientific literatures, I. Identifying and graphing specialties,Science Studies, 4 (1974) 17.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. C. GRIFFITH, H. SMALL, J. A. STONHILL, S. DEY, The structure of scientific literatures, II. Toward a macro- and microstructure for science,Science Studies, 4 (1974) 339.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. AARONSON, The footnotes of science,Mosaic, 6, No. 2 (1975) 22.

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. WADE, Citation analysis: A new tool for science administrators,Science, 188 (1975) 429.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. B. KRUSKAL, Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness-of-fit to a non-metric hypothesis,Psychometrika, 29 (1964) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. GARFIELD, M. V. MALIN, H. G. SMALL, Citation data as science indicators, in:Toward a Metric of Science: The Advent of Science Indicators, Y. ELKANA (Ed.), John Wiley, New York, 1978, p. 179–207.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. SMALL, Structural dynamics of scientific literature,International Classification, 3, No. 2 (1976) 67.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. GARFIELD,ISI Atlas of Science: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. GARFIELD, ISI's on-line system makes searching so easy even a scientist can do it: Introducing METADEX Automatic Indexing and ISI/BIOMED SEARCH,Current Contents ® (Editorial), 26 January 1981, reprinted in:Essays of an Information Scientist, ISI Press, Philadelphia Vol. 5, 1983, p. 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. GARFIELD,Index Chemicus goes online with graphic access to three million new organic compounds,Current contents ® (Editorial) (25 June 1984) 3.

  15. F. NARIN,Evaluative Bibliometrics: The Use Of Publication and Citation Analysis in the Evaluation of Scientific Activity, Final report on NSF Contract c-627, Computer Horizons Incorporated, Cherry Hill, NJ, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. MIYAMOTO, K. NAKAYAMA, A technique of two-stage clustering applied to environmental and civil engineering and related methods of citation analysis,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34 No. 3 (1983) 192.

    Google Scholar 

  17. B. C. GRIFFITH, H. D. WHITE, Authors as makers of intellectual Space: Co-citation in studies of science, technology and society,Journal of Documentation, 38, No. 4 (1983) 255.

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. SALTON, D. BERGMARK, A citation study of computer science literature,IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, PC-22, No. 3 (1979) 146.

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. SMALL, H. R. COWARD, M. C. DEAN, E. J. GREENLEE, S. E. COZZENS,Co-citation clusters as indicators of speciality development, Final Report on NSF GRANT SRS-7912157, Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  20. C. F. HEROT, Spatial management of data,ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 5, No. 4 (1980) 493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. E. GARFIELD, ‘World brain’ or ‘Memex’? Mechanical and intellectual requirements for universal bibliographic control, in:The Foundations of Access to Knowledge, E. B. MONTGOMERY (Ed.), Syracuse University Press, New York, 1968, p. 169.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Small, H., Sweeney, E. & Greenlee, E. Clustering the science citation index using co-citations. II. Mapping science. Scientometrics 8, 321–340 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018057

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018057

Keywords

Navigation