Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Words and indicators. As scientometrics stands

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. D. J. de Solla Price, Introduction, New Haven, 1962, In:Little Science, Big Science, Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, 1979. p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. V. Nalimov, Z. M. Mulchenko,Naukometria, Nauka, Moscow, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. Braun, W. Glänzel, A. Schubert,A 32-country Comparative Evaluation of Publishing Performance and Citation Impact, World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Koenig, The Fifth International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Call for Papers, Chicago, 1994.

  5. M. Callon, J.-P. Courtial, H. Penan,La Scientometrie, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Science Citation Index,E. Garfield (Ed.) Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia.

  7. Scientometrics,T. Braun (Ed.), Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., Akadémiai Kiadó, Amsterdam, Budapest.

  8. T. Kuhn,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Cole, The hierarchy of the sciences?American Journal of Sociology, 89 (1983) 111.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dictionary of History of Sciences,W. F. Bynum,E. J. Browne,R. Porter (Eds), The Macmillan Press, London, 1981, p. 377.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Römpp Vegyészeti Lexikon,O. A. Neumüller (Ed.), Műszaki Könyvkiadó, Budapest, 1982, Vol. 2, p. 620.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Vinkler, An attempt of surveying and classifying bibliometric indicators for scientometric purposes,Scientometrics, 13 (1988) 239.

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. Leydesdorff, The relations between quantitative theory and scientometric methods in science and technology studies. Introduction, to the topical issue,Scientometrics, 15 (1989) 333.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Leydesdorff, Relations among science indicators or more generally among anything one might wish to count about texts,Scientometrics, 19 (1990) 271.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J.-P. Courtial, B. Michelet, A mathematical model of development in a research field,Scientometrics, 19 (1990) 127.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. K. Merton,Social Theory and Social Structure, The Free Press, New York, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  17. T. Braun, A. Pálos, Textbook trails of eponymic knowledge in analytical chemistry,Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 8 (1989) 158.

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. Wolfram, C. M. Chu, Xin Lu, Growth of knowledge: Bibliometric analysis using online database, In:Informetrics 89/90,L. Egghe,R. Rousseau (Eds), Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1990, p. 355.

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. Vinkler, Giants, dwarfs and paradigmers,Psientometrics, 60 (1992) 35.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Central Research Institute for Chemistry of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Pusztaszeri út 59-67, 1025, Budapest, (Hungary)

    P. Vinkler

Authors
  1. P. Vinkler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Comments on the paper byW. Glänzel, U. Schoepflin,Scientometrics, 30 (1994) 375.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vinkler, P. Words and indicators. As scientometrics stands. Scientometrics 30, 495–504 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018130

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018130

Search

Navigation