Abstract
Using the field of acid rain research as a case study, it was found that scientists who contribute to the popular literature are more likely than others to be called on to give Congressional testimony (and vice versa) and that the work of these same scientists is well recognized by their peers as judged by rates of citation. Indeed, scientists who contribute to the popular literature are more highly cited than those who do not whether or not they are called upon for expert testimony. Since those who give testimony are more highly cited than those who do not, some evidence also exists that scientists called before Congressional hearings are among those most influential in the science community.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
B. Russell, The social responsibilities of scientists,Science, 131 (February 12, 1960) 391.
W.O. Hagstrom,The Scientific Community, Basic Books, New York, 1965, p. 35.
C. Sagan, The burden of skepticism,The Skeptical Inquirer, 12 (Fall 1987) 38.
R. Goodell,The Visible Scientists, Little/Brown, Boston, 1977, p. 90.
R. Goodell, Should scientists be involved in teaching science writing?Journal of Environmental Education, 10 (3, 1979) 21.
B.V. Lewenstein, Was there really a popular science boom?Science, Technology & Human Values, 12 (2, 1987) 29.
F.W. Lancaster, J.-L. Lee, Bibliometric techniques applied to issues management: A case study,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36 (6) (November 1985) 389.
S.F. Vozzo,International Directory of Acid Deposition Researchers, Acid Rain Foundation, Saint Paul, Minnesota, 1983 and 1985–1986.
R.A. Smith,Air and Rain: the Beginning of a Chemical Climatology, Longmans/Green,London, 1872.
R.V. Krejcie, D.W. Morgan, Determining sample size for research activities,Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30 (3) (Autumn 1970) 607.
W. Burkett,News Reporting: Science, Medicine, and High Technology, Iowa State University Press, Ames, 1986.
For more complete details of the study seeS. Bt. Abdullah,The Contribution of Scientists to the Popular Literature, Their Role as Expert Witnesses, and Their Influence on Their Peers: a Case Study in the Field of Acid Rain, Thesis, Urbana, University of Illinois, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, 1989.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Dedicated to the memory of Michael J. Moravcsik
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abdullah, S.B., Lancaster, F.W. The contribution of scientists to the popular literature, their role as expert witnesses, and their influence on their peers: A case study in the field of acid rain. Scientometrics 20, 55–64 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018143
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018143