Skip to main content
Log in

Scientometric analysis of the topical content of scientific research and its particularities

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new method for quantitative evaluation of the topical content of scientific research is proposed. The method is based on the analysis of the number and topic of publications in different fields. A mathematical model, describing the connection between level and width of research, between topic renewal and concentration of research is developed. Furthermore, coefficients characterizing various aspects of research are introduced. The theoretical conclusions fit well the factual data obtained from the INIS system. A nucleus of terms defining the most developed directions of research is found in each case. The analysis indicates that the growth rate of publications cannot serve as a reliable criterion of research topicality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G.M. Dobrov,Science of Science, Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  2. V.V. Nalimov, Z.M. Mulchenko,Scientometrics. Study of Science Development as an Information Process (in Russian), Nauka, Moscow, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. De Solla Price,Little Science, Big Science. Science about Science, Progress, Moscow, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S.D. Haitun,Scientometrics. State and Perspectives, Science, Moscow, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yu.V. Granovsky,Scientometric Analysis of the Information Flows in Chemistry, Nauka, Moscow, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A.A. Vasil'kovsky, I.V. Dziekovskaya, Dynamics of publications number in physics and thin layers technique growth and prognosis of this branch of science further development,Scientometrics, Prognostication, Informatics, Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1970, pp. 252–268

    Google Scholar 

  7. A.P. Trofimenko, Scientometric analysis of the development of nuclear physics during the last 50 years,Scientometrics, 11 (1987) 2

    Google Scholar 

  8. Methodological and Methodical Problems of Content-Analysis, Moscow, Leningrad, 1973, issues 1 and 2.

  9. I.M. Orient, Statistical study of the citing of publications in analytical chemistry,Zavodskaya Laboratoria, 33 (1967) 1383.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G.B. Preobrazhenskaya, N.M. Prutkova, Yu.V. Granovsky, Analysis of statistical terms in publications on spectral analysis and analytical chemistry,Zavodskaya Laboratoria, 40 (1974) 1240.

    Google Scholar 

  11. V.M. Potarov, I.N. Lukina, Scientometric analysis of some organic chemistry aspects development, In:Scientometric Research in Chemistry, Moscow, 1974, p. 102.

  12. G.M. Dobrov, V.V. Borisov, A formalyzed method of anlaysis of the used information content,Scientific and Technical Information, Ser. 2, 8 (1970) 3.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M.P. Shirshova, Scientometric analysis of some aspects of the high-molecular compound chemistry development, In:Logics of Development and Scientometric Analysis of Some Directions in Chemistry, Moscow, 1976, p. 35.

  14. A.N. Alekseev, About one method of the tendencies of social sciences development investigation, In:Science and Technology, Leningrad, 1972, N 7, part 1, p.68.

  15. V.M. Potapov, E.K. Kochetova, Referative journals indexes as a source of scientometric information, In:Logics of Development and Scientometric Analysis of Some Directions in Chemistry, Moscow, 1976, p.95.

  16. N. Raver, Performance of IR systems, In:Information Retrieval: A Critical View, Philadelphia, Wash, 1967, p.131.

  17. I.V. Marshakova, Investigation of the key-words frequency vocabulary,Scientific and Technical Information, Ser. 2, 11 (1974) 7.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S.D. Haitun, Quantitative methods of the science subject concentration determination, In:Social and Psychological Problems of Science, Nauka, Moscow, 1973, p.226.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S.D. Haitun, On the possibility of scientometric investigation of co-author publications, In:Problems of a Scientist and Scientific Units Activity, Moscow, Leningrad, 1979, p.303.

  20. M.V. Arapov,Quantitative Linguistics, Science, Moscow, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  21. INIS: Thesaurus (Rev. 25), International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1986.

  22. INIS Atomindex; Cumulative Index; Subject Index; IAEA, Vienna, v. 5–16, 1974–1985.

  23. F. Scarrott, Will Zipf join Gauss?New Scientist, 62 (1974) 402.

    Google Scholar 

  24. H.S. Sichel, On a distribution law for word frequencies,Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70 (542) 70 (1975) 542.

    Google Scholar 

  25. A.I. Yablonsky, Stochastical models of scientific activity, In:System Research, Yearbook 1975, Science, Moscow, 1976, p.5.

    Google Scholar 

  26. B.C. Brookes, Theory of the Bradford law,Journal of Documentation, 33 (1977) 180.

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. Vlachy, Frequency distribution of scientific performance. A bibliography of Lotka's law and related phenomena.Scientometrics, 1 (1978) 109.

    Google Scholar 

  28. INIS Atomindex; An International Abstracting Service, IAEA, Vienna, v. 5-16, 1974–1985.

  29. INIS Today, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1977.

  30. G.P. Dzudi, K. Todeskini, Use and potentional possibilities of INIS and AGRIS information systems in developing countries,IAEA Bulletin, Vienna, (1979) No.2/3, 47.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trofimenko, A.P. Scientometric analysis of the topical content of scientific research and its particularities. Scientometrics 18, 409–435 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02020154

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02020154

Keywords

Navigation