Skip to main content
Log in

Combinations of simulation and Evolutionary Algorithms in management science and economics

  • Algorithms For Decision Problems
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evolutionary Algorithms are robust search methods that mimic basic principles of evolution. We discuss different combinations of Evolutionary Algorithms and the versatile simulation method resulting in powerful tools not only for complex decision situations but explanatory models also. Realised and suggested applications from the domains of management and economics demonstrate the relevance of this approach. In a practical example three EA-variants produce better results than two conventional methods when optimising the decision variables of a stochastic inventory simulation. We show that EA are also more robust optimisers when only few simulations of each trial solution are performed. This characteristic may be used to reduce the generally higher CPU-requirements of population-based search methods like EA as opposed to point-based traditional optimisation techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Ablay, Konstruktion kontrollierter Evolutionsstrategien zur Lösung schwieriger Optimierungsprobleme der Wirtschaft, in:Evolution und Evolutionsstrategien in Biologie, Technik und Gesellschaft, 2nd ed., ed. J. Albertz (Freie Akademie, Wiesbaden, 1990) pp. 73–106.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W.B. Arthur, The economy and complexity, in:Lectures in the Sciences of Complexity, SFI Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, ed. E. Stein (Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, 1989) pp. 713–740.

    Google Scholar 

  3. W.B. Arthur, On learning and adaptation in the economy, Research Report 92-07-038, Santa Fe Institute (SFI), Santa Fe (1992).

  4. R.M. Axelrod, The evolution of strategies in the iterated Prisoner's Dilemma, in:Genetic Algorithms and Simulated Annealing, ed. L.D. Davis (Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, 1987) pp. 32–41.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. Bäck, The interaction of mutation rate, selection, and self-adaptation within a genetic algorithm, in:Parallel Problem Solving from Nature 2, 2nd Workshop PPSN II, eds. R. Männer and B. Manderick (North-Holland, 1992) pp. 85–94.

  6. T. Bäck and H.-P. Schwefel, An overview of evolutionary algorithms for parameter optimization, Evol. Comp. 1 (1993) 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Biethahn,Optimierung und Simulation (Gabler, Wiesbaden, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Biethahn and V. Nissen, Combining simulation and evolutionary algorithms for applications in complex economic systems, in:Modelling and Simulation ESM 1993, Proc. 1993 Simulation Multiconference Lyon, ed. A. Pave (SCS, Ghent, 1993) pp. 351–357.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. Bruderer, How organizational learning guides environmental selection, Working Paper, University of Michigan, School of Business Administration, Ann Arbor (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Bruderer, Strategic learning, Working Paper, University of Michigan, School of Business Administration, Ann Arbor (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. Carley, J. Kjaer-Hansen, A. Newell and M. Prietula, Plural-SOAR: a prolegomenon to artificial agents and organizational behavior, in:Artificial Intelligence in Organization and Management Theory, eds. M. Masuch and M. Warglien (North-Holland, 1992) pp. 87–118.

  12. G. Dosi, L. Marengo, A. Bassanini and M. Valente, Microbehaviours and dynamical systems: economic routines as emergent properties of adaptive learning, in:Path-dependent Economics, eds. C. Antonelli and P.A. David (Kluwer, 1993).

  13. D.B. Fogel, Evolving artificial intelligence, Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, San Diego (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Forrest, Emergent computation: self-organizing, collective, and cooperative phenomena in natural and artificial computing networks, Physica D 42 (1990) 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  15. F. Glover, Tabu search — Part I, ORSA J. Comp. 1 (1989) 190–206.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D.E. Goldberg,Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  17. H.A. Güvenir and J. Sirin, A genetic algorithm for classification by feature partitioning, in:Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Genetic Algorithms, Urbana-Champaign, IL, ed. S. Forrest (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, 1993) pp. 543–548.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M.T. Hannan and J. Freeman,Organizational Ecology (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  19. F. Hoffmeister and T. Bäck, Genetic algorithms and evolution strategies: similarities and differences, in:Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, 1st Workshop PPSN I, eds. H.-P. Schwefel and R. Männer (Springer, Berlin, 1991) pp. 455–469.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J.H. Holland, K.J. Holyoak, R.E. Nisbett and P.R. Thagard,Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  21. J.H. Holland,Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, 2nd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. Kirkpatrick, C. Gelatt and M. Vechi, Optimization by simulated annealing, Science 220 (1983) 671–680.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J.R. Koza,Genetic Programming (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  24. F. Kursawe, A variant of evolution strategies for vector optimization, in:Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, 1st Workshop PPSN I, eds. H.-P. Schwefel and R. Männer (Springer, Berlin, 1991) pp. 193–197.

    Google Scholar 

  25. F. Malik and G. Probst, Evolutionäres Management, Die Unternehmung 35 (1981) 121–140.

    Google Scholar 

  26. L. Marengo, Structure, competence and learning in an adaptive model of the firm,Papers on Economics & Evolution, #9203, European Study Group for Evolutionary Economics (1992).

  27. V. Nissen, Simulation und evolutionäre Algorithmen, Technical Report, Institut für Wirtschafts-informatik, Abteilung I, Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  28. V. Nissen, Evolutionary algorithms in management science. An overview and list of references,Papers on Economics & Evolution, #9303, European Study Group for Evolutionary Economics (1993).

  29. V. Nissen, Solving the quadratic assignment problem with clues from nature, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, special issue on Evolutionary Programming (1994), to appear.

  30. B. Noche,Simulation in Produktion und Materialfluß (Verlag TÜV Rheinland, Köln, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  31. H. Pierreval, Rule-based simulation metamodels, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 61 (1992) 6–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. J.D. Schaffer, Some experiments in machine learning using vector-evaluated genetic algorithms, Doctoral Dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  33. E. Schöneburg, Zeitreihenanalyse und -prognose mit Evolutionsalgorithmen, Research Paper, Expert Informatik GmbH, Berlin (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  34. H.-P. Schwefel,Numerical Optimization of Computer Models (Wiley, Chichester, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  35. R. Sikora and M. Shaw, The evolutionary model of group problem solving: a computational study of distributed rule learning, Inf. Syst. Res., to appear.

  36. T. Starkweather, S. McDaniel, K. Mathias and D. Whitley, A comparison of genetic sequencing operators, in:Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Genetic Algorithms, San Diego, CA, eds. R.K. Belew and L.B. Booker (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, 1991) pp. 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  37. R.H. Storer, S.D. Wu and R. Vaccari, Local search in problem and heuristic space for job shop scheduling genetic algorithms, in:New Directions for Operations Research in Manufacturing, eds. G. Fandel, T. Gulledge and A. Jones (Springer, Berlin, 1992) pp. 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  38. G. Syswerda, Uniform crossover in genetic algorithms, in:Proc. 3rd Conf. on Genetic Algorithms, George Mason University, ed. J.D. Schaffer (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, 1989) pp. 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  39. D. Whitley and J.D. Schaffer (eds.),COGANN-92, Int. Workshop on Combinations of Genetic Algorithms and Neural Networks, Baltimore (IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  40. U. Witt, Evolutionary economics — an interpretative survey,Papers on Economics & Evolution, #9104, European Study Group for Evolutionary Economics (1991).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biethahn, J., Nissen, V. Combinations of simulation and Evolutionary Algorithms in management science and economics. Ann Oper Res 52, 181–208 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02032303

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02032303

Keywords

Navigation