Skip to main content
Log in

Research performance in key medical universities in China observed from the scientific productivity

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research activities in the life sciences during the past few years, have increased appreciably in China, both in regard to relative output of publications and in their impact on the international research community. The purpose of this study is to analyze and evaluate quantitatively the scientific productivity of key medical universities in China by using CBMdisc, MEDLINE and SCI databases. The results showed that Tongji Medical University ranks first in terms of paper output in Chinese and in English languages, while Beijing Medical University is placed second in output but is first in citation impact. Shanghai Medical University had the top annual paper output per scientist, with 2.53 papers in Chinese and 0.13 papers in English. The results also showed that the coverage of Chinese biomedical publications by western indexing services is very poor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Yamazaki, Ranking Japan's life science research,Nature, 372 (1994) 125–126.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Eldor, Geography of medical publication,The Lancet, 341 (1993) 634–634.

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Q. Zhang, S. Yamazaki, Biomedical articles from China published in foreign periodicals based on Medline database,Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 14 (1995) 234–240 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Mervis, These papers top the citation charts,Science, 270 (1995) 1152–1152.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Maddox, D. Swinbanks, China still hopeful ten years on,Nature, 378 (1995) 537–552.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Health Yearbook in China, People's Medical Publishing House, Beijing, 1994 (in Chinese).

  7. F. Narin, J. D. Frame, The growth of Japanese science and technology,Science, 245 (1989) 600–605.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Irvine, B. Martin, T. Peacock, R. Turner, Charting the decline in British science.Nature, 316 (1985) 587–590.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. A. Staab,The Lancet, 341 (1993) 634–634.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Bekavac, J. Petrak, Z. Buneta, Citation behavior and place of publication in the authors from the scientific periphery: a matter of quality,Information Processing and Management, 30 (1994) 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  11. V. Diodato,Dictionary of Bibliometrics, New York. The Haworth Press, (1994) 145.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Yamazaki, Research activities in life science in Japan,Scientometrics, 29 (1994) 181–190.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yamazaki,op. cit. ref. 1,.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Q. Zhang, Y. H. Zhang, Scientometric study on research performance in China,Information Processing and Management, in press.

  15. T. Braun, W. Glänzel, H. Grupp, The scientometric weight of 50 nations in 27 science areas, 1989–1993. Part II. Life SciencesScientometrics, 34 (1995) 207–237.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haiqi, Z. Research performance in key medical universities in China observed from the scientific productivity. Scientometrics 37, 177–190 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02093494

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02093494

Keywords

Navigation