Skip to main content
Log in

The author cocitation structure of macroeconomics

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cocitations of the work of 42 prominent macroeconomists (past and present) were examined, using multidimensional scaling and clustering techniques. Author clusters, corresponding primarily to current schools of thought in macroeconomics, are arranged along two dimensions of scholarly style; 1) a relative orientation toward quantitative or mathematical models and issues and 2) a continuum of active concern with older scholarship in the field. Social relationships demonstrated by these techniques include joint journal editorship, mentor-student links and institutional affiliation. New to this study is evidence of the cocitation of prominent authors as ‘concept symbols’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes and References

  1. H. G. SMALL, Co-citation in the Scientific Literature: A Measure of the Relationship between Two Documents,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24 (1973) 265–269.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. G. SMALL, B. C. GRIFFITH, The Structure of Scientific Literatures I: Identifying and and Graphing Specialities,Science Studies, 4 (1974) 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. C. GRIFFITH, H. G. SMALL, J. A. STONEHILL, S. DEY, The Structure of Scientific Literatures II: Toward a Macro- and Microstructure for Science,Science Studies, 4 (1974) 339–364.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. D. WHITE, Cocited Author Retrieval Online: An Experiment with the Social Indicators Literature,Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 32 (1981) 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. D. WHITE, A Cocitation Map of the Social Indicators Movement,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, in press, 1982.

  6. H. D. WHITE, B. C. GRIFFITH, Author Cocitation: A Literature Measure of Intellectual Structure,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32 (1981) 163–171 (information science).

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. D. WHITE, B. C. GRIFFITH, A Cocitation Map of Authors in Judgment and Decision Research, in, Concepts in:Judgement and Decision Research, B. F. ANDERSON et al. Eds, New York, NY: Praeger, 1981, p. 261–271.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. D. WHITE, B. C. GRIFFITH, Authors as Markers of Intellectual Space,Journal of Documentation (in press).

  9. Baily reviews briefly the state of contemporary macroeconomics and notes that “Scientists must be dismayed as well as amused by the constant wrangling among schools of thought in macroeconomics. From the inside these disputes are fun...“ see M. N. BAILY, Economic Models under Challenge,Science, 216 (1982) 359–362.

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. H. BRANSON,Macroeconomic Theory and Policy, 2nd. ed. New York, NY: Harper & Row, 1979; R. DORNBUSCH, S. FISCHER, Macroeconomics, 2nd. ed., New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1980; S. WEINTRAUB,Keynes, Keynesians and Monetarists, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1978; F. C. WYCOFF,Macroeconomics Theory, Evidence, and Policy, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Names added to this list include three authors (Azariadis, Lucas andSargent) representing relatively new research areas which are not well covered in the texts.Clower was added as an important member of an existing school. 18th and 19th century economists and contemporary post-Keynesian authors were selected from Weintraub's extensive listings after consultation with Roger A.McCain, Fordham University and EileenApplebaum, Temple University.

  12. See note 4, op. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  13. See WHITE and GRIFFITH, note 5–6, op. cit. H. D. WHITE, A Cocitation Map of the Social Indicators Movement,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, in press, 1982. H. D. WHITE, B. C. GRIFFITH, Author Cocitation: A Literature Measure of Intellectual Structure,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32 (1981) 163–171 (information science).

  14. The three highest cocitation values were added together and the sum divided by two. The resulting number was placed in the diagonal cell. See WHITE and GRIFFITH, note 5–8, op. cit. H. D. WHITE, A Cocitation Map of the Social Indicators Movement,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, in press, 1982. H. D. WHITE, B. C. GRIFFITH, Author Cocitation: A Literature Measure of Intellectual Structure,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32 (1981) 163–171 (information science). H. D. WHITE, B. C. GRIFFITH, A Cocitation Map of Authors in Judgment and Decision Research, in, Concepts in:Judgement and Decision Research, B. F. ANDERSON et al. Eds, New York, NY: Praeger, 1981, p. 261–271. H. D. WHITE, B. C. GRIFFITH, Authors as Markers of Intellectual Space,Journal of Documentation (in press).

  15. J. B. KRUSKAL, M. WISH,Multidimensional Scaling (Ouantitative Applications in the Social Sciences No. 11), Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  16. SAS Institute, the VARCLUS Procedure, in, SAS 79.5 Changes and Enhancements (SAS Technical Report P-115): 14.1–14.12, 1981.

  17. See the source texts, note 11, ; for general background on macroeconomics and prevaling schools of thought.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See A. OKUN,Prices and Ouantities, Washington DC, Brookings Instutition, 1981, for a review of these two new theory groups.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See A. EICHNER, J. A. KREGEL, An Essay on Post-Keynesian Theory: A new Paradigm in Economics,Journal of Economic Literature 13 (1975) 1293–1314; A. LEIJONHUFVUD,On Keynesian Economics and the Economics of Keynes, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See R. P. WOLFE, Piero Sraffa and the Rehabilitation of Classical Political Economy,Social Research, 49 (1982) 209–238 for a general dscussion.

    Google Scholar 

  21. They may also be more frequently cocited with the disequeilibrium theorists (as representatives of contrasting positions). E. APPLEBAUM, personal communication.

  22. See WOLFE, note 24,op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  23. See discussion in F. N. KERLINGER,Foundation of Behavioral Research, 2nd. ed., NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gordon refers toTobin as “the outspoken arch-opponent of Milton Friedman's analysis of monetary problems and of his opposition to activist government intervention”; see R. J. GORDON,Macroeconomics, New York, NY: Little, Brown and Co., 1978, p. 342.

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. SMALL, Cited Documents as Concept Symbols,Social Studies in Science, 8 (1978) 327–340. See S. E. COZZENS, Split Citation Identity: A Case Study from Economics,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33 (1982) 233–236, for a review of the literature on citation context.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Roger A. McCAIN, personal communication.

  27. See OKUN, note 22,op cit..

    Google Scholar 

  28. Andrew POLICANO and Paul BECKERMAN, personal communication.

  29. See comments on infrequent pairings in information science, WHITE and GRIFFITH, note 6,op. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  30. See WHITE, note 5, op. cit. A Cocitation Map of the Social Indicators Movement,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, in press, 1982.

  31. See, for instance, comments by R. J. GORDON, note 29,op. cit.. introductory remarks.

    Google Scholar 

  32. See SMALL, note 30,op. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  33. See WHITE and GRIFFITH, notes 6-8,op. cit. 163–171 (information science). H. D. WHITE, B. C. GRIFFITH, Authors as Markers of Intellectual Space,Journal of Documentation (in press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCain, K.W. The author cocitation structure of macroeconomics. Scientometrics 5, 277–289 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02147224

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02147224

Keywords

Navigation