Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A semantics for speech acts

  • Published:
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Speech act theory is important not only in Linguistics, but also in Computer Science. It has applications in Distributed Computing, Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, and Electronic Data Interchange protocols. While much research into speech acts has been done, one aspect of them that has largely been ignored is their semantics, i.e. their conditions of satisfaction. A formal semantics for speech acts is motivated and presented here that relates their satisfaction to the intentions, know-how, and actions of the participating agents. This makes it possible to state several potentially useful constraints on communication and provides a basis for checking their consistency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.F. Allen and C.R. Perrault, Analyzing intentions in utterances, Art. Int. 15(1980)143–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. Appelt,Planning English Sentences (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.L. Austin,How to do Things with Words (Clarendon, Oxford, UK, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. Bach and R.M. Harnish,Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  5. K.M. Chandy and J. Misra, How processes learn, Distr. Comp. 1(1986)40–52.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. M.K. Chang, SANP: A communication level protocol for supporting machine-to-machine negotiation in organization, Master's Thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  7. P.R. Cohen and H.J. Levesque, Rational interaction as the basis for communication, Technical Report No. 433, SRI International, Menlo Park, VA (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  8. S.K. Dewitz and R.M. Lee, Legal procedures as formal conversations: Contracting on a performative network, in:Int. Conf. on Information Systems (1989).

  9. E.A. Emerson, Temporal and modal logic, in:Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, ed. J. van Leeuwen (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Grice, Utterer's meaning and intentions, Philos. Rev. (1969); reprinted in ref. [15].

  11. J. Groenendijk and M. Stokhof, On the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers, in:Varieties of Formal Semantics, ed. F. Landman and F. Veltman (Foris, Dordrecht, 1984) pp. 143–170.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C.L. Hamblin,Imperatives (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Harrah, The logic of questions, in:Handbook of Philosophical Logic, ed. D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  14. M.N. Huhns, D. Bridgeland and N. Arni, A DAI communication aide, Technical Report No. ACT-RA-317-90, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation, Austin, TX (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  15. A.P. Martinich (ed.),The Philosophy of Language (Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. McCarthy, Common business communication language, in:Textverarbeitung und Bürosysteme, ed. A. Endres and J. Reets (Oldenbourg, Vienna, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Perrault, An application of default logic to speech act theory, Technical Report No. 90, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, CA (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J.R. Ross, On declarative sentences, in:Readings in English Transformational Grammar, ed. R.A. Jacobs (Ginn & Co., Waltham, MA, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  19. J.R. Searle,Speech Acts (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  20. J.R. Searle, Indirect speech acts, in:Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, ed. P. Cole and J.L. Morgan (Academic Press, New York, 1975); reprinted in ref. [15] A.P. Martinich (ed.),The Philosophy of Language (Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  21. J.R. Searle and D. Vanderveken,Foundations of Illocutionary Logic (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  22. M.P. Singh, A logic of situated know-how, in:National Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) (1991).

  23. M.P. Singh, Towards a formal theory of communication for multiagent systems, in:Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) (1991).

  24. M.P. Singh, On the semantics of protocols among distributed intelligent agents, in:IEEE Int. Phoenix Conf. on Computers and Communications (1992).

  25. M.P. Singh, A theory of actions, intentions, and communications for multiagent systems, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Texas, Austin, TX (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  26. M.P. Singh and N.M. Asher, A logic of intentions and beliefs, J. Philos. Logic (1992), in press.

  27. D. Vanderveken,Meaning and Speech Acts, Vol. 1:Principles of Language Use (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  28. D. Vanderveken,Meaning and Speech Acts, Vol. 2:Formal Semantics of Success and Satisfaction (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Z. Vendler, On saying something, in:Res Cogitans: A Study in Rational Psychology (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 1972); reprinted in ref. [15] A.P. Martinich (ed.),The Philosophy of Language (Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. EI-Carnot Project, MCC, 78759, Austin, TX, USA

    Munindar P. Singh

  2. Department of Computer Sciences, University of Texas, 78712, Austin, TX, USA

    Munindar P. Singh

Authors
  1. Munindar P. Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (through Grant No. IRI-8945845 to the Center for Cognitive Science, University of Texas, Austin) and by the Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation, Austin.

The author is indebted to the anonymous referees for comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, M.P. A semantics for speech acts. Ann Math Artif Intell 8, 47–71 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02451549

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02451549

Keywords

Search

Navigation