Abstract
Medical journals are products of national medical cultures, which influence the organization of medical research and the readiness to employ different research methodologies. A content analysis was undertaken to ascertain the characteristics of scientific papers in nine Russian and three American medical journals published in 1992. The American medical journals were thriving, both in appearance, and with research contributions coming from a decentralized national system of research institutions and also from European and other international research centers. Much of American medical research is “big science” based on collaborative efforts of researchers at a number of institutions. Russian medical journals, in contrast, were more parochial in content, reporting mainly local research, with several primary journals serving as outlets for endeavors of sponsoring institutes. While Russian medical culture did appear to discourage usage of classical random experimental designs, the choice of research methodologies proved to be influenced more by medical specialization than by national culture.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes and references
J. G. Shaw, Article-by-article citation analysis of medical journals,Scientometrics, 12 (1987) 101–110.
T. Schott, Soviet science in the scientific world system,Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 13 (1992) 410–439.
L. Payer,Medicine & Culture: Notions of health and sickness in Britain, the U.S., France and West Germany, Victor Gollancz, London, 1989.
E. Garfield, Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation,Science, 178 (1972) 471–479.
M. Berg, Turning a practice into a science: reconceptualizing postwar medical practice,Studies of Science, 25 (1995) 437–476.
I. K. Zola, S. J. Miller, The erosion of Medicine from within, in:E. Freidson (Ed.),The Professions and Their Prospects, Sage, Beverly Hills, California, 1973, pp. 153–172.
E. Freidson,Medical Work in America: Essays on Health Care, Yale University Press, New Haven & London, 1989;J. Ben-David,The Scientist's Role in Society: A Comparative Study, Prentice-Hall, Princeton, 1971.
A. I. Smolnyakov, E. Y. Fedorenko,Physicians Ethics, Zdorovie, Kiev, 1982;S. Ya. Doletsky, Risk in terms of general and surgical aspects,Khirurgia/Surgery, No. 3 (1992) 3–11;V. P. Petlenko, A. Yu. Baranovsky, Methodological fundamentals of medical prognosis,Klinicheskaya Meditsina/Clinical Medicine, No. 1 (1992) 3–8.
I. Sheiman, Health care reform in the Russian Federation,Health Policy, 19 (1991) 45–54.
A. J. Montegut, Health care in Eurasia,The New England Journal of Medicine, 327 (1992) 737.
SeeL. Payer, Ref. 3.
SeeL. Payer, Ref. 3.
SeeA. I. Smolnyakov, E. Y. Fedorenko, Ref. 8. American physicians have also been found to subvert the principles of randomized experimentation because of a concern about the best interests of their patients, seeK. F. Schultz, Subverting randomization in controlled trials,Journal of the American Medical Association, 274 (1995) 1456–1458.
P. Wallich, M. Holloway, Health care without perverse incentives,Scientific American, 269 (1993) 91.
B. Bozeman, M. Crow, The environments of U.S. R&D laboratories: political and market influences,Policy Sciences, 23 (1990) 25–56.
SeeJ. Ben-David, Ref. 7.
T. Braun, W. Glänzel, H. Grupp, The scientometric weight of 50 nations in 27 science areas, 1989–1993. Part II. Life sciences,Scientometrics, 34 (1995) 207–237;W. W. Gibbs, Lost science in the third world,Scientific American, 273 (1995) 92–99.
SeeT. Braun, W. Glänzel, H. Grupp, Ref. 17 ;S. M. Lawani, Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research,Scientometrics, 9 (1986) 13–25.
SeeT. Schott, Ref. 2.
S. G. Solomon, Reflections on Western studies of Soviet science, in:L. L. Lubrano, S. G. Solomon (Eds),The Social Context of Soviet Science, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, 1980, pp. 1–29.
B. P. Kurashvili, Restructuring and the enterprise, in:A. Jones, W. Moskoff (Eds),Perestroika and the Economy: New Thinking in Soviet Economics, M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY, 1989, pp. 21–44;D. J. McCarthy, S. M. Puffer, Perestroika at the plant level: managers' job attitudes and views of decision making in the former USSR,The Columbia Journal of World Business, (1992) 86–99;A. T. Samorodov, Transition, poverty and inequality in Russia,International Labour Review, 131 (1992) 335–353.
E. L. Logan, W. M. Shaw Jr., A bibliometric analysis of collaboration in a medical specialty,Scientometrics, 20 (1991) 417–426.
J. F. Miquel, Y. Okubo, Structure of international collaboration in science—Part II: comparisons of profiles in countries using a link indicator,Scientometrics, 29 (1994) 271–297.
T. Luukkonen, R. J. W. Tijssen, O. Persson, G. Sivertsen, The measurement of international scientific collaboration,Scientometrics, 28 (1993) 15–36.
P. Bakker, H. Rigter, Editors of medical journals: who and from where,Scientometrics, 7 (1985) 11–22.
SeeP. Bakker, H. Rigter, Ref. 25.
SeeP. Bakker, H. Rigter, Ref. 25.
L. L. Lubrano, The hidden structure of Soviet science,Science, Technology, & Human Values, 18 (1993) 147–175.
V. A. Markusova, B. C. Griffith, Highly cited Soviet journals in the physical and life sciences: a study of the function of journals,Scientometrics, 21 (1991) 99–113.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goldberg, A.I., Oigenblick, L. & Rubin, AH.E. Scientific articles and national medical cultures: A comparison of Russian and American medical journals. Scientometrics 39, 57–75 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457430
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457430