Skip to main content
Log in

The importance of human relationships in scientific productivity

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fifty Brazilian scientists working in life sciences were interviewed in order to explore reasons of bursts and falls in their scientific productivity. Scientists recognize specific periods of time of their career during which they are more productive. Bursts of productivity are influenced mainly by human relationships and, to a lower extent, by material conditions (equipment, grants, etc), time dedicated to work and reasons linked to the kind of work carried out. The most productive scientists tend to attribute more importance to human relations than their colleagues with lower productivity scores. Some possible reasons for this discrepancy are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Grynspan, L. de Meis, The concept of creativity among biochemists,Biochemical Education, 18 (1990), 182–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. Cole, Citation and the evaluation of individual scientists,TIBS, 14 (1989) 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Meneghini, L. Fonseca, Indices alternativos de avaliação cientifica em bioquímica no Brasil;Ciência e Cultura, 42 (9) (1990) 629–645.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. de Meis, R. C. P. Machado, P. Lustosa, V. R. Soares, M. T. Caldeira, L. Fonseca, The stereotyped image of the scientist among students of, different countries: Evoking the alchemist?Biochemical Education, 21 (2) (1993) 75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Leta, L. De Meis, A profile of science in Brazil,Scientometrics, 35 (1) (1996) 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. L. R. Harmon, The development of a criterion of Scientific competence. in:Scientific Creativity: its Recognition and Development,C. W. Taylor,F. Barron (Eds). New York, Wiley, 1963, pp. 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Sonnert, What makes a good scientist?: Determinants of peer evaluation among biologists,Social Studies of Science, 25 (1995) 35–55.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. A. Krebs, The making of a scientists,Nature, 215 (1967) 1441–1445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. R. K. Merton, The Mattew effect in science,Science, 159 (1968) 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. M. Rossiter, The Mattilda effect in science,Social Studies of Science, 23 (1993) 325–341.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Z. Qin, D. W. Johnson, R. T. Johnson, Cooperative versus competitive efforts and problem solving.Review of Educational Research (1995) 129–143.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. de Meis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fonseca, L., Velloso, S., Wofchuk, S. et al. The importance of human relationships in scientific productivity. Scientometrics 39, 159–171 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457445

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457445

Keywords

Navigation