Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results

Some simple mathematical considerations concerning the role of self-citations

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is an ongoing discussion on the influence of international collaboration on impact as measured by citation-based indicators. Collaboration generally involves more authors than ‘no collaboration’ work and it is obvious that the phenomenon of self-citation will be stronger (there are more authors to cite themselves). Thus it can be seen as an important ‘amplifier’ of measured impact. Although this effect is certainly possible and already demonstrated recently, it should not be considered as the only or even major explanation of higher impact in the comparison between ‘no collaboration’ and international collaboration. Using data of an extensive bibliometric study of astronomical research in the Netherlands, we prove that higher rates of self-citation in international collaboration do not play any significant role as ‘impact amplifier’. The central point is that proper impact measurement must involve corrections for self-citations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. A. F. J. Van Raan (1997), Science as an international enterprise,Science and Public Policy, 24, 5, 290–300.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. F. Moed, R. E. de Bruin, A. J. Nederhof, R. J. W. Tijssen (1991), International scientific cooperational and awareness within the European Community: Problems and Perspectives,Scientometrics, 21, 291–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. D. Frame, M. P. Carpenter (1979), International research collaboration,Social Studies of Science, 9, 481–497.

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Narin, E. S. Whitlow (1990),Measurement of scientific cooperation and co-authorship in EC-related areas of science. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. EC-Report EUR 12900.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Herbertz (1995), Does it pay to cooperate? A bibliometric case study in moleculare biology,Scientometrics, 33, 117–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Bonzi, H. W. Snyder (1991), Motivations for citation: a comparison of self citation and citation to others,Scientometrics, 21, 245–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. F. J. van Raan, Th. N. van Leeuwen (1995)A Decade of Astronomy Research in the Netherlands. Research Report to the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (Astronomy Division, NWO/ASTRON). Leiden: Centre for Science and Technology Studies, report CWTS-95-01, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. F. Moed, R. E. De Bruin, Th. N. Van Leeuwen (1995), New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: database description, overview of indicators and first applications,Scientometrics, 33, 381–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. F. J. Van Raan (1996), Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises,Scientometrics, 36, 397–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Raan, A.F.J. The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results. Scientometrics 42, 423–428 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458380

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458380

Keywords

Navigation