Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Citation analysis as a theory of friction of polluted air?

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is argued that Leydesdorff's theory of citations mixes the ideal or pure case with complicating factors. Ideally, citations are used as shorthand and for ethical reasons. The social network between scientists should be seen as a second-order correction on the basic model or, sometimes, even as noise. Metaphorically speaking Leydesdorff's theory is not a theory about ideal gases, but about polluted air.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. Cronin, The need for a theory of citing,Journal of Documentation, 37 (1981) 16–24.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. E. Cozzens, Taking the measure of science: a review of citation theories.Newsletter of the International Society for the Sociology of Knowledge, 7(1–2) (1981).

  3. T. A. Brooks, Private acts and public objects: an investigation of citer motivations,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36 (1985) 223–229.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. Luukkkonen, Why has Latour's theory of citations been ignored by the bibliometric community? Discussion of sociological interpretations of citation analysis,Scientometrics, 38 (1997) 27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. C. H. Scholz, Earthquakes and friction laws,Nature, 391 (1998) 37–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. E. Garfield, More on the ethics of scientific publication: abuses of authorship attribution and citation amnesia undermine the reward system of science,Current Contents, July 26, 1982.

  7. B. A. Palevitz, The ethics of citation: a matter of science's family values,The Scientist, 11(12), June 9, 1997, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. N. Gilbert, Referencing as persuasion.Social Studies of Science, 7 (1977) 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Rousseau, Why am I not cited or why are multi-authored papers more cited than others?Journal of Documentation, 48 (1992) 79–80.

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Leydesdorff, Theories of citation?Scientometrics, 43 (1998): this issue.

  11. W. T. Jones, A fuzzy set characterization of interaction in scientific research,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27 (1976) 307–310.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. Small, Cited documents as concept symbols,Social Studies of Science, 8 (1978) 327–340.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Rousseau, Kinematical statistics of scientific output. Part I: geographical approarch,Revue française de Bibliométrie, 4 (1989) 50–64.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Egghe, Comments on the paper of L. Leydesdorff's ‘Theories of citations?’Scientometrics, 43 (1998): this issue.

  15. H. Collins, Take me to your leader,New Scientist, 157 (1998) no 2125, 48–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Industrial Sciences and Technology, KHBO, Zeedijk 101, B-8400, Oostende, Belgium

    R. Rousseau

  2. UIA, IBW, Universiteitsplein, 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium

    R. Rousseau

Authors
  1. R. Rousseau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Comments on Theories of Citation?L. Leydesdorff,Scientometrics, 43 (1998) No. 1.

Permanent address.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rousseau, R. Citation analysis as a theory of friction of polluted air?. Scientometrics 43, 63–67 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458395

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458395

Keywords

Search

Navigation