Skip to main content
Log in

Can technology lead to a competitive advantage? A case study of Flanders using european patent data

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study tries to analyze regional technological capabilities, linking technological positions to economic strength of the region. To measure this link, we correlate the EPO patent data with trade data to assess the degree to which technological advantages are translated into comparative advantages for the Flemish region in Belgium. The analysis for Flanders provides some interesting insights. Following the skewed distribution of firms, the technological areas in which Flanders is able to build, a strong position are very specific: printing technology, weaving technology, photography and recently also telecommunications. Weak positions are outspoken in car technology. Linking these strengths and weaknesses in technological areas to economic activity revealed an important mismatch between both. Most of the Flemish patents are in sectors without any comparative advantage, while most of the sectors where Flanders does hold a comparative advantage, like chemicals and pharmaceuticals, do not show strong technological advantages in terms of patents. Given the mismatch that was detected between technological positions and economic advantages, it is of crucial importance to better understand the (missing) links between the various actors in the regional innovation system. The analysis points out two important issues. The large and growing number of foreign applications to Belgian/Flemish inventors and the large number of subsidiaries of foreign firms among Belgian/Flemish applications illustrate the pervasiveness of the foreign dimension in the Belgian/Flemish technological landscape. Also very specific to the Belgian/Flemish situation, is the limited importance of universities or research centers in terms of patenting activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balassa, An empirical demonstration of classical comparative cost theory,Review of Economics and Statistics, 4((1961).

  • Debackere, K., D. Rollez,Design capabilities to support innovation strategies, Research Report DTEW (1998).

  • Gambardella, A., S. Torrisi, Does technological convergence imply convergence in markets? Evidence from the electronics industry,Research Policy, 27, (1998), 445–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z., (Ed.)R&D, Patents and Productivity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z., Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey,Journal of Economic Literature, 28, (1990) 1661–1707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grindley, P. C., D. J. Teece, Managing intellectual capital: licensing, and cross-licensing in semiconductors and electronics,California Management Review, 39, 2, (1997) 8–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R., Underinvestment and incompetence as a response to radical innovation,Rand Journal of Economics, 24, (1993), 465–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R., Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg M.,The Bayh-Dole Act and trends in university patenting, CEPR Discussion paper Nr 433 (1995).

  • Levin, R. et al., Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development,Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 3, (1987) 783–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoleni, R., R. Nelson, Benefits and costs of strong patent protection: a contribution to the current debate,Research Policy, 27, (1998), 273–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merges, R., R. Nelson, On the complex economics of patent scope,Columbia Law Review, 90, (1990), 839–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., Noma, E., R. Perry, Patents as, indicators of corporate technological strength,Research Policy, 16, (1987), 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., R. P. Rozek, Bibliometric analysis of US pharmaceutical industry research performance,Research Policy, 17, (1988), 139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., Linkage between patents and papers: an interim EPO/US comparison,Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, (1997), Jerusalem, Israel.

  • Patel, P., K. Pavitt, The continuing, widespread importance of improvements in mechanical technologies,Research Policy, 23, (1994), 533–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, P., K. Pavitt, The technological competencies of the world's largest firms: complex and path-dependent, but not much variety,Research Policy, 26 (1997), 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappa, M. A., Debackere, K., R. Garud, Technological progress and the duration of contribution spans,Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 42, (1992), 133–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmoch, U., N. Kirsch,Internationaler Vergleich von Forschung und Entwicklung im Telekommunikationsbereich: Aktualisierung, 1991/92, ISI-reports, (1992).

  • Schmoch, U., Hinze, S., N. Kirsch,Analysis of the dynamic relationship between technical and economic performances in information and telecommunication sectors, ISI-reports, (1992).

  • Teece, D. J., Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy,Research Policy, 15, (1986) 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trajtenberg, M., A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations,The Rand Journal of Economics, 21, 1. (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Verspagen, B.,MERIT ISIC-IPC Concordance Table, MERIT Research Memorandum, (1994).

  • Veugelers, R., B. Cassiman, Make and buy in innovation strategies: Evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms,Research Policy, (1998), to appear.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Debackere, K., Luwel, M. & Veugelers, R. Can technology lead to a competitive advantage? A case study of Flanders using european patent data. Scientometrics 44, 379–400 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458486

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458486

Keywords

Navigation