Skip to main content
Log in

Corpus relevance through co-word analysis: An application to plant proteints

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Different corpuses are analysed by means of co-word analysis, in the framework of technological watch of the industrial valorization of plant proteins. The comparison of keyword clusters reveals unequal results, raising the question of the relevance of information retrieval. The corpuses compiled do not provide all the important signals that can be expected from this type of study. Research on several data bases (five) provides increasingly detailed images which allow for rapid progress, with the experts, towards critical points of information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Alvarez, P., Pulgarin, A. (1996): The Rash Model. Measuring information from keywords: The diabetes field,Journal of the Ameircan Society for Information Science, 47 no 6, 468–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., Law, J., Rip, A. (1986):Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology, Mac Millan, London, 242 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtial, J. P. (1990):Introduction à la scientométrie, de la bibliométrie à la veille technologique, Antropos, Paris, 137 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtial, J. P. (1992): Comments on Leydesdorff's A validation study of LeximappeScientometrics, 25, 313–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuadra, C. A., Katter, R. V. (1967): Opening the black box of ‘Relevance’,Journal of Documentation, 23 no 4, 291–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, D. (1996): The dilemma of measurement in information retrieval research,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47 no 1, 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemarié, J., de Looze, M. A., Rivaud, D., Etude bibliométrique sur la valorisation des protéines, Oléagineux Corps gras Lipides, Sept 1996, forthcoming.

  • Leydesdorff, L. (1992): A validation study of Leximappe,Scientometrics, 25, 295–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (1992): A Reply to Courtial's Comments,Scientometrics, 25, 317–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quoniam, L., Rostaing, H., Dou, H., Indicators' Relativity and Data Collection Dependence, Fourth International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, Anvers, 5–7 October 1995, pp. 139–143.

  • Schamber, L. (1994): Relevance and information behavior,Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 29, 3–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tague Sutcliffe, J. M. (1996): Some perspectives on the evaluation of information retrieval systems,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47, no 1, 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Besselar, P., Leydesdorff, L. (1996): Mapping change in scientific specialities: A scientometric reconstruction of the development of artificial intelligence,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47 no 6, 415–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Raan, A. F. J., Tijssen, R. J. W. (1993): The neural net of neural network research: An exercise in bibliometric mapping.Scientometrics, 26, 61–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Looze, MA., Lemarié, J. Corpus relevance through co-word analysis: An application to plant proteints. Scientometrics 39, 267–280 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458530

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458530

Keywords

Navigation