Skip to main content
Log in

Publication behaviour and international impact: Scandinavian clinical and social medicine, 1988–96

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper presents the results of an empirical study of the Danish and Nordic Publication behaviour and international impact in Clinical and Social Medicine covering the period 1988–96. As indicators are applied the international visibility of Scandinavian research output, the publication activity per capita in SCI journals, the development over time of the national citation impact in an OECD and World context, and the ratio of cited papers relative to the World. Compared toMay's analysis (1997), covering 1981–94, the analysis shows that a certain reshuffle of national positions among the OECD countries in citation impact has occurred. UK and New Zealand as well as Denmark and Sweden have lost in ranking to Finland and Belgium, both countries coming up from behind. The most interesting results concern the opposite research policy strategies displayed by Finland and Denmark which result in similar impact patterns relative to the World impact. The implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ingwersen, P. (1998), The International Visibility of Danish and Scandinavian Research 1988–96: A General Overview of Science & Technology and Social Sciences by Online Publication analysis. Copenhagen: Centre for Informetric Studies, Royal School of Library and Information Science (CIS Report-5).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lewison, G. (1997), New bibliometric techniques for the evaluation of medical schools. In:Peritz, B. andEgghe, L. (Eds).Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. Jerusalem, Israel, 1997, June 16–19 Jerusalem, Israel: The School of Library, Archive and Information Studies, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 1997. p. 219–228.

    Google Scholar 

  3. May, R. M. (1997, February), The scientific wealth of nations.Science, 275:793–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Christensen, F. H., Ingwersen, P. (1996), Online citation analysis: a methodological approach.Scientometrics, 37:39–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ingwersen, P., Christensen, F. H. (1997), Data set isolation for bibliometric online analysis of research publications: fundamental methodological issues.Journal of American Society for Information Science, 48 (3):205–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Olsen, T. B., Hansen, H. F., Luukkonen, T., Persson, O. Sivertsen, G. (1994),Nordisk Forskning i Internasjonal Sammenheng: en Bibliometrisk Beskrivelse av Publisering og siteringer i naturvidenskapelig og medisinsk forskning Copenhagen: Nordic Council, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bonitz, M., Bruckner, E. Scharnhorst, A. (1996), Why and how could we measure the Matthew effect for countries? In:P. Ingwersen andN. O. Pors (Ed.).Information Science: Integration in Perspective. Copenhagen, Royal School of Library and Information Science: 185–199.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ingwersen, P., Wormell, I. Publication behaviour and international impact: Scandinavian clinical and social medicine, 1988–96. Scientometrics 46, 487–499 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459606

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459606

Keywords

Navigation