Skip to main content
Log in

Mapping the dynamics of telephone switching devices

  • Scientometrics at the S&T Interface
  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this contribution relations between scientific articles, conference proceedings and patents relating to telephone switching are analyzed. The state-of-the-art in scientometrics and science and technology studies leads one to expect relations among these documents. Empirical findings show the opposite. To interpret these findings I focus on two key issues in scientometrics, namely the frequency of linkages among documents and the nature of communication. The resulting conclusion is that scientometrics should be informed by theories concerning the evolutionary dynamics of science and technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. de Solla Price, Is technology historically independent of science? A study in statistical historiography,Technology and Culture, 6 (1965) 553–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. F. Narin, E. Noma, Is technology becoming science?,Scientometrics, 7 (1985) 369–381, at p.370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. F. Narin, D. Olivastro, Status report: linkages between technology and science,Research Policy, 21 (1992) 237–249, at p.248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. W. H. G. Higgins, A survey of Bell system progress in electronic switching,The Bell System Technical Journal, XLIV (1965) No. 6, 937–997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. E. Joe (Ed.),A History of Engineering and Science in the Bell System. Switching Technology (1925–1975), Bell Telephone Laboratories Inc., 1982.

  6. J. E. Villar, Traffic calculations in SPC systems,Proceedings of the 8th ITC Conference, Melbourne, November 10–17, 1976.

  7. K. W. Stoate, D. W. Barfoot, Stored program control for telephone exchanges: the world scene,The Post Office Electrical Engineerings' Journal, 66 (1974) 219–224.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Ward, Total control of telephone exchanges by s.p.c.,GEC Journal of Science & Technology, 39 (1972) 181–184.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. M. Leakey, G. N. Lawrence, Stored program control in telephone switching systems,GEC Journal of Science & Technology, 39 (1972) 131–136.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stoate andBarfoot,op. cit. ref. 7 at, p. 219.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Smookler,Invention and Economic Growth, Cambridge, Mass., 1966.

  12. B. L. Basberg, Patents and the measurement of technological change: a survey of the literature,Research Policy, 16 (1987) 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. F. J. Van Raan (Ed.)Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology, North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  14. T. J. Allen,Managing the Flow of Information. Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information within the R&D Organization, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. L. Suchman,Information Transfer in Engineering, Glastonbury, Conn./ Washington D.C.: The Futures group, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. Bear,Principles of Telecommunication Traffic Engineering, Oxford/London: Peter Peregrinus Ltd/ The Institution of Electrical Engineers, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  17. The ITC—past, present and future, Contributions to the closing session of the 13th International Teletraffic Congress, Copenhagen, June 19–26, 1991.

  18. F. Narin, D. Olivastro, Technology indicators based on patents and patent citations, inop. cit. ref. 13, 465–507.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. S. Burt, Network data from archival records, in:R. S. Burt, M. J. Minor,Applied Network Analysis. A Methodological Introduction, Beverley Hills/London: Sage Publications, 1983, 158–174.

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. Collins, S. Wyatt, Citations in patents to the basic literature,Research Policy, 17 (1988) 65–74, at p. 68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. R. R. Nelson, S. D. Winter,An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  22. G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, L. Soete (Eds),Technical Change and Economic Theory, London/New York: Pinter Publishers, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  23. L. Leydesdorff, P. van den Besselaar (Eds),Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory. New Developments in Technology Studies, London/New York: Pinter Publishers, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. Callon, J. Law, A. Rip (Eds),Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology, London: MacMillan Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  25. W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, T. Pinch,The Social Construction of Technological Systems, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  26. W. E. Bijker, J. Law (Eds),Shaping Technology/Building Society, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  27. H. R. Coward, J. J. Franklin, Identifying the science-technology interface: matching patent data to a bibliometric model,Science, Technology and Human Values, 14 (1989) No. 1, 50–77.

    Google Scholar 

  28. B. G. van Vianen, H. F. Moed, A. F. J. van Raan, An exploration of the science base of recent technology,Research Policy, 19 (1990) 61–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. M. S. Granovetter, The strength of weak ties,American Journal of Sociology, 78 (1973) No. 6, 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. M. S. Granovetter, The strength of weak ties. A network theory revisited, in:P. V. Marsden, N. Lin (Eds),Social Structure and Network Analysis, London/New York:Sage Publications, 1982, 105–130.

    Google Scholar 

  31. R. S. Burt,Toward a Structural Theory of Action. Notwork Models of Social Structure, Perception, and Action, New York/London: Academic Press 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  32. E. M. Rogers, L. Kincaid,Communication Networks: Towards a New Paradigm for Research, New York: Free Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  33. R. L. Coser, The complexity of roles as a seedbed of individual autonomy, in:L. A. Coser,The Idea of Social Structure. Papers in Honor of Robert K Merton, New York/Chicago: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1975, 237–264.

    Google Scholar 

  34. B. Bernstein,Class, Codes and Control, Vol. 1, Theoretical Studies in the Sociology of Language, Routledge & Kegan Paul/Paladin, 1973.

  35. R. Rothwell, Patterns of information flow during the innovation process,ASLIB Proceedings, 27 (1975) No. 5; reprinted inB. C. Griffith (Ed.),Key Papers in Information Science, New York: Knowledge Industry Publications on behalf of the American Society for Information Science, 1980.

  36. A. C. L. de Meyer, The flow of technological innovation in an R&D department,Research Policy, 14 (1985) 315–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. U. Schmoch, Indicators and the relations between science and technology, paper presented at the NECSTS workshop ‘Quantitative Approaches to Science and Technology Studies’, Amsterdam, May 1996.

  38. A. Rip, Natural and artificial aggregation: socio-cognitive conditions for scientometrics, paper presented at the NECSTS workshop ‘Quantitative Approaches to Science and Technology Studies’, Amsterdam, May 1996.

  39. H. Simon,The Science of the Artificial, Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press, 1969. (Reprinted in 1981.)

    Google Scholar 

  40. H. Simon, The organization of complex systems, in:H. Pattee,Hierarchy Theory. The Challenge of Complex Systems, New York: George Braziller, 1973, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  41. N. Luhmann,Soziale Systeme, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  42. L. Leydesdorff,The Challenge of Scientometrics. The Development, Measurement, and Self-Organization of Scientific Communications, Leiden: DSWO Press, Leiden University, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  43. G. Blauwhof,The Non-linear Dynamics of Technological Developments: An Exploration of Telecommunications Technology, Ph.D. thesis University of Amsterdam 1995.

  44. L. Leydesdorff, Scientometrics and communication theory: codification, control, self-organization, paper presented at the NECSTS workshop ‘Quantitative Approaches to Science and Technology Studies’, Amsterdam, May 1996.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blauwhof, G. Mapping the dynamics of telephone switching devices. Scientometrics 38, 117–140 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461127

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461127

Keywords

Navigation