Abstract
This paper examines an example of learning with artifacts using the commonplace materials of string and knots. Emphases include research into learning processes as well as construction of objects to assist learning. The inquiry concerns the development of mathematical thinking, topology in particular. The research methodology combines participant observation and clinical interview within a constructionist framework. The study was set in a self-styled, self-constructed environment that consisted of knots and a social substrate encouraging lively exchanges of ideas about them. Comparisons of certain knots helped to elicit conceptions of the fundamental topological relationships of neighborhood, continuity, and boundaries. The paper includes comments on the suitability of specific artifacts for specific kinds of thinking and learning, and emphasizes the importance for software design of considering different learning styles.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berg, D. N. and Smith, K. K. (1985).Exploring Clinical Methods for Social Research. Sage, Beverly Hills.
Beth, E. W. (1966).The Foundations of Mathematics: A Study in the Philosophy of Science, Harper & Row, New York.
Beth, E. W. and Piaget, J. (1966).Mathematical Epistemology and Psychology, Trans. Mays, W. Dordrecht-Holland, D. Reidel.
Binder, T. “Learning with Artifacts?”,AI&Society, this volume.
Caron-Pargue, J. (1983). “Codage verbal et codage graphique de noeuds,” Proceedings of La Pensée Naturelle: Actes du Colloque de Rouen, Press Universitaire de France (Publications de l’Université de Rouen), Paris.
Caron-Pargue, J. (1985). “Analyse d’instructions graphiques pour faire un noeud: La filiation des significations dans des dessins d’enfants,” Laboratoire de Psychologie, Université de Rouen.
Ericsson, K. A. and Simon, H. A. (1984).Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Fischer, G. and Nakakoji, K. (1992). “Beyond the Macho Approach of Artificial Intelligence: Empower Human Designers — Do Not Replace Them,”Knowledge-Based Systems. 5, 1.
Fischer, G. (1994). “Turning Breakdowns into Opportunities for Creativity,”Knowledge-Based Systems. 7, 4.
Geertz, C. (1973).The Interpretation of Cultures, Basic Books, New York.
Gruber, H. E. and Vonèche, J. J. (eds.) (1977).The Essential Piaget: An Interpretive Reference and Guide, Basic Books, New York.
Harel, I. and Papert, S. (eds.) (1991).Constructionism., Ablex, Norwood, NJ.
Jacob, E. (1987). “Qualitative Research Traditions: A Review,”Review of Educational Research, 57, 1. 1–50.
Kafai, Y. and Resnick, M. (1995).Constructionism in Practice: Designing, Thinking, and Learning in a Digital World, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Laing, R. D. (1970).Knots, Random House, New York.
Lane, M. (ed.) (1970).Introduction to Structuralism, Basic Books, New York.
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991).Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Muller, M. and Kuhn, S. (eds.) (1993). “Special Issue on Participatory Design,” 36, 4.CACM.
Nilsson, J. “Designing Artefacts for Learning,”AI & Society, this volume.
Olson, D. R. (1970).Cognitive Development: The Child’s Acquisition of Diagonality, Academic Press, New York.
Papert, S. (1980).Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas, Basic Books, New York.
Papert, S. (1990). “A Unified Computer Environment for Schools: A Cultural/ Constructionist Approach,” Proposal to National Science Foundation, Cambridge, MA, Epistemology and Learning Group, MIT.
Papert, S. (1993). The Children’s Machine: Rethinking School in the Age of the Computer, Basic Books, New York.
Piaget, J. (1951).The Child’s Conception of the World, Trans. Tomlinson, J. and A. Humanities Press, New York.
Piaget, J. (1970).Structuralism, Trans., ed. Chaninah Maschler, Basic Books, New York.
Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B. (1967).The Child’s Conception of Space, Trans. Langdon, F. J. and Lunzer, J. L. W. W. Norton, New York.
Polkinghorne, D. (1983).Methodology for the Human Sciences: Systems of Inquiry, Albany, State University of New York Press.
Schön, D. A. (1992). “Designing as Reflective Conversation with the Materials of a Design Situation,”Knowledge-Based Systems 5, 1.
Schuler, D. and Namioka, A. (eds.) (1993).Participatory Design: Principles and Practices, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Strohecker, C. (1991).Why Knot? Ph.D. diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Strohecker, C. (1991). “Elucidating Styles of Thinking through Learning about Knots,”Constructionism, Harel, I. and Papert, S, (eds.) Ablex Publishing, Norwood.
Strohecker, C. (1996). “Design of an Environment for Learning about Topology and Learning about Learning,”Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Learning Sciences, Evanston, Assoc. for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
Suchman, L. (1987).Plans and Situated Actions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Turkle, S. (1981).Psychoanalytic Politics: Freud’s French Revolution, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Turkle, S. (1984).The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit, Simon and Schuster, New York.
Turkle, S. and Papert, S. (1990). “Epistemological Pluralism: Styles and Voices Within the Computer Culture,”Signs 16, 1.
van Sommers, P. (1984).Drawing and Cognition: Descriptive and Experimental Studies of Graphic Production Processes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Winnicott, D. W. (1965).The Maturational Processes and the Holding Environment: Studies in the Theory of Emotional Development, International Universities Press, Madison.
Winnicott, D. W. (1971).Playing and Reality, Tavistock, London.
Winnicott, D. W. (1971).Therapeutic Consultations in Child Psychiatry, Hogarth Press, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Strohecker, C. Understanding topological relationships through comparisons of similar knots. AI & Soc 10, 58–69 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02716755
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02716755