Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding topological relationships through comparisons of similar knots

  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines an example of learning with artifacts using the commonplace materials of string and knots. Emphases include research into learning processes as well as construction of objects to assist learning. The inquiry concerns the development of mathematical thinking, topology in particular. The research methodology combines participant observation and clinical interview within a constructionist framework. The study was set in a self-styled, self-constructed environment that consisted of knots and a social substrate encouraging lively exchanges of ideas about them. Comparisons of certain knots helped to elicit conceptions of the fundamental topological relationships of neighborhood, continuity, and boundaries. The paper includes comments on the suitability of specific artifacts for specific kinds of thinking and learning, and emphasizes the importance for software design of considering different learning styles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berg, D. N. and Smith, K. K. (1985).Exploring Clinical Methods for Social Research. Sage, Beverly Hills.

  • Beth, E. W. (1966).The Foundations of Mathematics: A Study in the Philosophy of Science, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beth, E. W. and Piaget, J. (1966).Mathematical Epistemology and Psychology, Trans. Mays, W. Dordrecht-Holland, D. Reidel.

  • Binder, T. “Learning with Artifacts?”,AI&Society, this volume.

  • Caron-Pargue, J. (1983). “Codage verbal et codage graphique de noeuds,” Proceedings of La Pensée Naturelle: Actes du Colloque de Rouen, Press Universitaire de France (Publications de l’Université de Rouen), Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caron-Pargue, J. (1985). “Analyse d’instructions graphiques pour faire un noeud: La filiation des significations dans des dessins d’enfants,” Laboratoire de Psychologie, Université de Rouen.

  • Ericsson, K. A. and Simon, H. A. (1984).Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G. and Nakakoji, K. (1992). “Beyond the Macho Approach of Artificial Intelligence: Empower Human Designers — Do Not Replace Them,”Knowledge-Based Systems. 5, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G. (1994). “Turning Breakdowns into Opportunities for Creativity,”Knowledge-Based Systems. 7, 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973).The Interpretation of Cultures, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. E. and Vonèche, J. J. (eds.) (1977).The Essential Piaget: An Interpretive Reference and Guide, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harel, I. and Papert, S. (eds.) (1991).Constructionism., Ablex, Norwood, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, E. (1987). “Qualitative Research Traditions: A Review,”Review of Educational Research, 57, 1. 1–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafai, Y. and Resnick, M. (1995).Constructionism in Practice: Designing, Thinking, and Learning in a Digital World, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing, R. D. (1970).Knots, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, M. (ed.) (1970).Introduction to Structuralism, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991).Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, M. and Kuhn, S. (eds.) (1993). “Special Issue on Participatory Design,” 36, 4.CACM.

  • Nilsson, J. “Designing Artefacts for Learning,”AI & Society, this volume.

  • Olson, D. R. (1970).Cognitive Development: The Child’s Acquisition of Diagonality, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1980).Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1990). “A Unified Computer Environment for Schools: A Cultural/ Constructionist Approach,” Proposal to National Science Foundation, Cambridge, MA, Epistemology and Learning Group, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1993). The Children’s Machine: Rethinking School in the Age of the Computer, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1951).The Child’s Conception of the World, Trans. Tomlinson, J. and A. Humanities Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1970).Structuralism, Trans., ed. Chaninah Maschler, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B. (1967).The Child’s Conception of Space, Trans. Langdon, F. J. and Lunzer, J. L. W. W. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polkinghorne, D. (1983).Methodology for the Human Sciences: Systems of Inquiry, Albany, State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1992). “Designing as Reflective Conversation with the Materials of a Design Situation,”Knowledge-Based Systems 5, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, D. and Namioka, A. (eds.) (1993).Participatory Design: Principles and Practices, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strohecker, C. (1991).Why Knot? Ph.D. diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Strohecker, C. (1991). “Elucidating Styles of Thinking through Learning about Knots,”Constructionism, Harel, I. and Papert, S, (eds.) Ablex Publishing, Norwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strohecker, C. (1996). “Design of an Environment for Learning about Topology and Learning about Learning,”Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Learning Sciences, Evanston, Assoc. for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

  • Suchman, L. (1987).Plans and Situated Actions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (1981).Psychoanalytic Politics: Freud’s French Revolution, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (1984).The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit, Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. and Papert, S. (1990). “Epistemological Pluralism: Styles and Voices Within the Computer Culture,”Signs 16, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Sommers, P. (1984).Drawing and Cognition: Descriptive and Experimental Studies of Graphic Production Processes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1965).The Maturational Processes and the Holding Environment: Studies in the Theory of Emotional Development, International Universities Press, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1971).Playing and Reality, Tavistock, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1971).Therapeutic Consultations in Child Psychiatry, Hogarth Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carol Strohecker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strohecker, C. Understanding topological relationships through comparisons of similar knots. AI & Soc 10, 58–69 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02716755

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02716755

Keywords

Navigation