Abstract
One of the central issues is how the computer can enter in the learning process. A considerable amount of research has examined how children’s interactions and learning with computational artifacts are situated. A different approach focuses on the learning through computational artifacts: what can and do children learn when making a computational artifact? This paper studies the experience of elementary-school students making computer games to teach fractions to younger students. The analysis addresses how the social interactions and the artifact constructions situated students’ learning experience. The discussion examines the relationships between designing and learning from a situated learning perspective.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Avedon, E. M. and Sutton-Smith, B. (1966) (Eds.). The study of games. Wiley, New York.
Block, J. H. and King, N. R. (1987) (Eds.). School play. Garland, New York.
Brown, A., Ash, D. Rutherford, M., Nakagawa, K., Gordon, A., and Campione, J. (1993). Distributed expertise in the classroom. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations, 188–228, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., and Duguid, (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18 (1), 32–42.
Buckley, C. (1989). Made in patriarchy: Toward a feminist analysis of women and design. In V. Margolin (Ed.), Design Discourse, 251–264, Chicago University Press. Chicago, IL.
Harel, I. (1991). Children designers. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ.
Jones, J. C. (1980). Design methods. Seeds of human futures. Wiley & Sons, New York.
Kafai, Y. B. (1995). Minds in play: Computer game design as a context for children’s learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Kafai, Y. B. and Ching, C. C. (1996). Meaningful contexts for mathematical learning: The potential of game making activities. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Learning Sciences (ICLS 96). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Charlottsville, VA.
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Malone, T. W., and Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In Snow, R. E. and Farr, M. J. (Eds.). Aptitude, learning and instruction. 3: Conative and affective process analyses, 223–253. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Margolin, V. (1989). Design discourse. Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL.
Norman, D. A. and Draper, S. W. (Ed.). (1986). User-centered system design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms. Basic Books, New York.
Papert, S. (1993). The children’s machine. Basic Books, New York.
Piaget, J. (1929/1964). The child’s conception of the world. Routledge, London.
Provenzo, E. F. (1991). Video kids: Making sense of Nintendo. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in Thinking. Oxford University Press, New York.
Rowe, P. (1987). Design Thinking. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Salomon, G. (ed.) (1993). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Schön, D. A. (1988). Designing: Rules, types and worlds. Design Studies, 9 (3), 181–190.
Schön, D. A. (1985). The design studio. An Exploration of its traditions and potential. RIBA Publications, London.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. Basic Books. New York.
Simon, H. A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Solomon, C. (1986). Computer environments for children. The MIT Press, Cambridge.
Suchman, L. (1990). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human machine communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kafai, Y. Learning through artifacts: Communities of practice in classrooms. AI & Soc 10, 89–100 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02716758
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02716758