Skip to main content
Log in

The new organisation of work: Building coalitions

  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article introduces the theme of the special issue, linking current concerns in European social and industrial relations policy with the research traditions covered byAI & Society. Human centredness, skill and technology, and the central importance of education and learning are emphasised as we build new development coalitions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainger A., Kaura R. and Ennals R. (1995)Executive Guide to Business Success through Human-Centred Systems. Springer-Verlag, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson I. (1986) (ed.)Intelligent Machinery: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw D.C.A. (1995) (ed.)Bringing Learning to Life: The Learning Revolution, the Economy and the Individual. Falmer Press, Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodner P. (1990)The Shape of Future Technology: The Anthropocentric Alternative. Springer-Verlag, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusco S. and Solinas G. (1997)Competitiva e Participazione: Un istituto per il lavoro per promuovere un modello di relazioni industrali basato sulla cooperazione. Il Mulino, Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Public Policy and British Business. (1997)Promoting Prosperity: A Business Agenda for Britain. Vintage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Community Development Foundation. (1992)Press Enter: Information Technology in the Community and Voluntary Sector. CDF, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley M. (1987)Architect or Bee? Hogarth Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearing R. (1997)Higher Education in the Learning Society. HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demarco R. (1996)Kunst=Kultur, Art=Wealth. Adam Smith Lecture, Fife College 1995. Kingston Business School.

  • Eijnatten, F. van.(1993)The Paradigm that Changed the Work Place. Social Science for Social Action: Towards Organisational Renewal 4. Van Gorcum, Maastricht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennals R. (1986)Star Wars: A Question of Initiative. John Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennals R. (1987) (ed.)Artificial Intelligence State of the Art Report. Pergamon Infotech, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennals R. (1991)Artificial Intelligence and Human Institutions. Springer-Verlag, London.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ennals R. (1995)Executive Guide to Preventing IT Disasters. Springer-Verlag, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennals R. (1997)Enterprise Culture: The Role of Festival. Presented at conference “Steiner, Art and Science: A City Responds” Dundee August 1997

  • Ennals R. and Gardin J-C. (1990) (eds)Interpretation in the Humanities: Perspectives from Artificial Intelligence. British Library, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennals R. and Gustavsen B. (1998) (eds)Work Organisation and Europe as a Development Coalition. Dialogues in Work and Innovation. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennals R. and Johansson A.L. (1995) (eds)The Future of Work, Technology and Knowledge. Kingston University, Kingston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennals R. and Molyneux P. (1993) (eds)Managing with Information Technology. Springer-Verlag, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill K. (1986) (ed.)Artificial Intelligence for Society. John Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göranzon B. (1992)The Practical Intellect: Computers and Skill, UNESCO and Springer-Verlag, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göranzon B. (1995) (ed.)Skill, Technology and Enlightenment: On Practical Philosophy. Springer-Verlag, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göranzon B. and Florin M. (1990) (eds)Artificial Intelligence, Culture and Language: On Education and Work. Springer-Verlag, London.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Göranzon B. and Florin M. (1991) (eds)Dialogue and Technology: Art and Knowledge. Springer-Verlag, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göranzon B. and Florin M. (1992) (eds)Skill and Education: Reflection and Experience. Springer-Verlag, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göranzon B. and Josefson I. (1998) (eds)Knowledge, Skill and Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood D. and Gonzales Santos J. (1993) Industrial Democracy as Process: Participatory Action research in the Fagor Cooperative Group of Mondragon. Social Science for Social Action: Towards Organisational Renewal 2. Van Gorcum, Maastricht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory D. (1996) Action Research and Trade Unions: Some Experience from the UK.Concepts and Transformation 1(2/3).

  • Gustavsen B. (1992) Dialogue and Development. Social Science for Social Action:Towards Organisational Renewal 1. Van Gorcum, Maastricht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsen B., Hofmaier B., Philips M.E. and Wikman A. (1996) Concept-driven Development and the Organisation of the Process of Change: Anevaluation of the Swedish Working Life Fund.Dialogues on Work and Innovation 3. John Beniamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsen B. (1996) Is Theory Useful?Concepts and Transformation, The New Organisation of Work: 1(1).

  • Hammer M. and Champy J. (1993)Reengineering the Corporation. Harper, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy C. (1994)The Empty Raincoat. Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman J. (1996)The University for Industry. Institute for Public Policy Research, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton W. (1995)The State We’re In. Cape, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson A.L. (1995)The Swedish Model. National Institute for Working Life, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josefson I. (1996) Practical Traditions of Knowledge among Physicians.Concepts and Transformation 1(2/3).

  • Lomax P. (1996) (ed)Quality Management in Education: Sustaining the Vision through Action Research. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masuda Y. (1990) (ed.)Human-Centred Systems in the Global Economy. Springer-Verlag, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson M. (1995)Executive Guide to Speech-Driven Computing Systems. Springer-Verlag, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miliband D. (1990)Technology Transfer. Institute for Public Policy Research, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negrotti M. (1991) (ed.)Understanding the Artificial. Springer Verlag, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley B. and Owen K. (1987)Alvey: Britain’s Strategic Computing Initiative. MIT Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranson S.M. (1994)Towards the Learning Society. Cassell, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbrock H. (1989)Designing Human Centred Technology. Springer-Verlag, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin S. and Gustavsen B. (1996) (eds) Beyond Theory: Changing Organisations through Participation.Dialogues on Work and Innovation 2. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin S. (1996) Is Action Research Really “Research”?Concepts and Transformation 1(1).

  • Toulmin S. (1997)An Action Research course for NGO staff: proposal to Skebo research conference, Stockholm, May 1997.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Ennals.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ennals, R. The new organisation of work: Building coalitions. AI & Soc 11, 155–165 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02812445

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02812445

Keywords

Navigation