Skip to main content
Log in

Preference disaggregation in financial modeling: Basic features and some examples

  • Published:
Operational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multicriteria decision aid provides several methodologies which are well adapted to the modeling of financial decision making problems. A well known approach in MCDA is preference disaggregation analysis. The preference disaggregation approach refers to the analysis (disaggregation) of the global preferences (judgement policy) of the decision maker in order to identify the criteria aggregation model that underlies the preference result. The objective of this paper is to review the main existing preference disaggregation methodologies and to illustrate their operation using an example from the field of financial modelling involving the credit granting problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anastassiou, Th., and Zopounidis, C. (1997). Country risk assessment: A multicriteria analysis approach. The Journal of Euro-Asian Management vol. 3/1, 51–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W.D., and Kress, M. (1991). A multiple criteria decision model with ordinal preference data. European Journal of Operational Research vol. 54, 191–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosset, J., Siskos, Y., and Zopounidis, C. (1992). Evaluating country risk: A decision support approach. Global Finance Journal vol. 3/1, 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devaud, J.M., Groussaud, G., and Jacquet-Lagreze, E. (1980). UTADIS: Une methode de construction de fonctions d’utilite additives rendant compte de jugements globaux. European Working Group on Multicriteria Decision Aid, Bochum.

  • Diakoulaki, D., Zopounidis, C., Mavrotas, G., and Doumpos, M. (1999). The use of a preference disaggregation method in energy analysis and policy making. Energy-The International Journal vol. 24/2, 157–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doumpos, M., and Zopounidis, C. (1998). The use of the preference disaggregation analysis in the assessment of financial risks. Fuzzy Economic Review vol. 3/1, 39–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatzinakos, I., Yannacopoulos, D., Faltsetas, C., and Ziourkas, C. (1991). Application of the MINORA decision support system to the evaluation of landslide favourability in Greece. European Journal of Operational Research vol. 50, 60–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horsky, D., and Rao, M.R. (1984). Estimation of attribute weights from preference comparisons. Management Science vol. 30/7, 801–822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurson, Ch., and Zopounidis, C. (1997). Gestion de Portefeuille et Analyse Multicritere. Economica, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquet-Lagreze, E. (1990). Interactive assessment of preferences using holistic judgments: The PREFCALC system, in Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Making, (C.A. Bana e Costa, ed.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 335–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquet-Lagreze, E. (1995). An application of the UTA discriminant model for the evaluation of R & D projects, in Advances in Multicriteria Analysis, (P.M. Pardalos, Y. Siskos, C. Zopounidis, eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 203–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquet-Lagreze, E., and Siskos, Y.: (1982). Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision making, the UTA method, European Journal of Operational Research vol. 10, 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquet-Lagreze, E., and Siskos, J. (2001). Preference disaggregation: Twenty years of MCDA experience. European Journal of Operational Research vol. 130/2, 233–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L., and Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-offs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, K.F., and Choo, E.U. (1995). Goal programming in preference decomposition, Journal of the Operational Research Society vol. 46, 205–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsatsinis, N.F., and Siskos, Y. (1998). MARKEX: An intelligent decision support system for product development decisions. European Journal of Operational Research (to appear).

  • Oral, M., and Kettani, O. (1989). Modelling the process of multiattribute choice. Journal of the Operational Research Society vol. 40/3, 281–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardalos, P.M., Siskos, Y., and Zopounidis, C. (1995). Advances in Multicriteria Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekelman, D., and Sen, S.K. (1974). Mathematical programming models for the determination of attribute weights, Management Science vol. 20/8, 1217–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richard, J.L. (1983). Aide a la decision stratégique en P.M.E., in Methode de Decision Multicritere, Hommes et Techniques, (E. Jacquet-Lagreze and Y. Siskos, eds.), Paris, 119–142.

  • Roy, B. (1968). Classement et choix en presence de points de vue multiples: La methode ELECTRE, R.I.R.O vol. 8, 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B. (1985). Methodologie Multicritere d’Aide a la Decision. Economica, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B. (1991). The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. Theory and Decision vol. 31, 49–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharlig, A. (1985). Decider Sur Plusieurs Criteres. Collection Diriger l’Entreprise, Presses Polytechniques Romandes.

  • Siskos, J. (1982). A way to deal with fuzzy preferences in multi-criteria decision problems. European Journal of Operational Research vol. 10, 314–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siskos, J. (1986). Evaluating a system of furniture retail outlets using an interactive ordinal regression method. European Journal of Operational Research vol. 23, 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siskos, J., and Assimakopoulos, N. (1989). Multicriteria highway planning: A case study, Mathematical and Computer Modelling vol. 12/10-11, 1401–1410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siskos, Y., and Yannacopoulos, D. (1985). UTASTAR: An ordinal regression method for building additive value functions, Investigacao Operacional vol. 5/1, 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siskos, Y., and Zopounidis, C. (1987). The evaluation criteria of the venture capital investment activity: An interactive assessment. European Journal of Operational Research vol. 31, 304–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siskos, Y., Spiridakos, A., and Yannacopoulos, D. (1993). MINORA: A multicriteria decision aiding system for discrete alternatives. Journal of Information Science and Technology vol. 2, 136–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siskos, Y., Spiridakos, A., and Yannacopoulos, D. (1999). Using artificial intelligence and visual techniques into preference disaggregation analysis: The MIIDAS system. European Journal of Operational Research vol. 113, 236–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siskos, Y., Grigoroudis, E., Zopounidis, C., and Saurais, O. (1998). Measuring customer satisfaction using a collective preference disaggregation model. Journal of Global Optimization vol. 12/2, 175–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spronk, J. (1981). Interactive Multiple Goal Programming Application to Financial Planning, Martinus Nijhoff Publishing, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, V., and Shocker, A.D. (1973). Linear programming techniques for multidimensional analysis of preferences, Psychometrika vol. 38/3, 337–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steuer, R.E. (1986). Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation and Application, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T.J. (1987). Pruning of decision alternatives in multiple criteria decision making, based on the UTA method for estimating utilities. European Journal of Operational Research vol. 28, 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincke, Ph. (1992). Multicriteria Decision-Aid, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Baffins Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny, M. (1982). Multiple Criteria Decision Making, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zionts, S. (1992). The state of multiple criteria decision making: Past, present, and future, in Multiple Criteria Decision Making, (A. Goicoechea, L. Duckstein and S. Zionts, eds.), Springer-Verlag, New York, 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zopounidis, C. (1987). A multicriteria decision-making methodology for the evaluation of the risk of failure and an application, Foundations of Control Engineering vol. 12/1, 45–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zopounidis, C. (1990). La Gestion du Capital-Risque, Economica, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zopounidis, C. (1995). Evaluation du Risque de Defaillance de l’Entreprise: Methodes et Cas d’Application, Economica, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zopounidis, C. (1999). Multicriteria decision aid in financial management. European Journal of Operational Research vol. 119/2, 404–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zopounidis, C., and Doumpos, M. (1997). A multicriteria decision aid methodology for the assessment of country risk. European Research on Management and Business Economics vol. 3/3, 13–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zopounidis, C., and Doumpos, M. (1998). Developing a multicriteria decision support system for financial classification problems: The FINCLAS system, Optimization Methods and Software vol. 8, 277–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zopounidis, C., and Doumpos, M. (1999). A multicriteria decision aid methodology for sorting decision problems: The case of financial distress. Computational E-conomics vol. 14/3, 197–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zopounidis, C., and Doumpos, M. (2000). PREFDIS: A multicriteria decision support system for sorting decision problems. Computers and Operations Research vol. 27/7-8, 779–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zopounidis, C., Matsatsinis, N.F., and Doumpos, M. (1996). Developing a multicriteria knowledge-based decision support system for the assessment of corporate performance and viability: The FINEVA system, Fuzzy Economic Review vol. 1/2, 35–53.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Constantin Zopounidis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zopounidis, C. Preference disaggregation in financial modeling: Basic features and some examples. Oper Res Int J 1, 263–284 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02936355

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02936355

Keywords

Navigation