Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-criteria decision making for broker agents in elearning environments

  • Published:
Operational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we deal with the problem of enhancing the decision making abilities of broker agents in digital learning resources brokerage systems. Following a multi-criteria decision making approach, we provide broker agents with the means to qualitatively represent the user preferences and efficiently evaluate the proposed alternatives. Learner modelling and digital learning resources description parameters are inferred by a classic cognitive style modelling method, the Honey and Mumford model. We study two different aspects in modelling the learning resources recommendation problem: first formulated as a decision problem for the agent representing the learner by using a unique synthesis criterion approach; second, as a decision problem for the agent representing the content provider by using an approach based on the UTA method. Both aspects are studied in the context of a generic agent-based brokerage architecture, with broker agents requesting, describing and offering e-learning courses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beuthe, M. and Scannella, G. (2001). Comparative analysis of UTA multicriteria methods. European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 130.

  • Guttman, R., Moukas, A. and Maes, P. (1998). Agent-mediated Electronic Commerce: A Survey. Knowledge Engineering Review, vol. 13 (3).

  • Honey, P. and Mumford, A. (1992). The Manual of Learning Styles. 3rd Ed., Maidenhead, Peter Honey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquet-Lagreze, E. and Siskos, J. (1982). Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision-making: The UTA method. European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 10, 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquet-Lagreze, E. and Siskos, Y. (2001). Preference disaggregation: 20 years of MCDA experience. European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 130, 233–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, N. R. (2001). An agent-based approach for building complex software systems. Communications of the ACM, vol. 44 (4), 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maes, P., Guttman, R. and Moukas, A.. (1999). Agents that Buy and Sell: Transforming Commerce as We Know It. Communications of the ACM, vol. 42 (3), 81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manouselis N., and Sampson, D. (2003). Agent-based e-Learning Course Discovery and Recommendation: Matching Learner Characteristics with Content Attributes. International Journal of Computers and Applications (IJCA), vol. 25 (1).

  • Roy, B. (1996). Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Sampson, D., and Karagiannidis, C. (2002). Accommodating Learning Styles in Adaptation Logics for Personalised Learning Systems, in Proc. ED-MEDIA 2002, Denver, Colorado, USA.

  • Tennant, N. (1988). Theories, Concepts and Rationality in an Evolutionary Account of Science. Biology and Philosophy, vol. 3, 224–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nikos Manouselis or Demetrios Sampson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manouselis, N., Sampson, D. Multi-criteria decision making for broker agents in elearning environments. Oper Res Int J 2, 347–361 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02936390

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02936390

Keywords

Navigation