Abstract
New network routing technologies such as MPLS and Diffserv provide a way for network service providers to dramatically improve quality of service in their IP networks, whilst at the same time offering more value-added applications consumers are demanding. However, these technologies are not fully understood in this context and network service providers are not yet able to optimize the design of their IP networks. A recently formed company has developed a computer aided design simulation tool to address this problem. A review of the literature on quality of service, IP networks, design and simulation suggests this tool may provide optimization benefits. On the other hand network service providers will only adopt this tool if they recognize simulation as the most effective way to solve their design-related problems. Exploratory research with network service providers currently deploying Diffserv networks revealed they want to keep their networks simple through the use of over-provisioning and stringent analytical modeling. Thus, there may not be a strong market demand at present for such a simulation tool. However, networks are expected to become more complex as their product life cycle matures and at that time a higher demand for such a tool may develop.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armitage, G. (2000).Quality of Service in IP Networks: Foundations for a Multi-Service Internet. Macmillan Technical Publishing, Indianapolis, IN.
Black, U. (2001).MPLS and Label Switching Networks. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Brady, K. and Cronin, J. (2001). Some New Thoughts on Conceptualizing Perceived Service Quality: A Hierarchical Approach.Journal of Marketing vol. 65(3), 34–49.
Caesar, M., Balaraman, S. and Ghosal, D. (2000) A Comparative Study of Pricing Strategies for IP Telephony.IEEE GLOBECOM 2000 Conference Record 344–349.
Chaharbaghi, K. (1990). Using Simulation to Solve Design and Operational Problems.International Journal of Operations and Productions Management vol. 10(9), 89–105.
Churchill, G. and Surprenant, C. (1982). An Investigation into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction.Journal of Marketing Research vol. 19(4), 491–504.
Day, G. and Reibsteiu, D. (1997).Wharton on Dynamic Competitive Strategy. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Garvin, D. (1984). What does ‘Product Quality’ Really Mean.Sloan Management Review vol. 26(1), 25–44.
Garzia, F. and Garzia, M. (1990).Network Modeling, Simulation and Analysis. Marcel Dekker, New York.
Grönroos, C. (1984). A Service Quality Model and Its Implications.European Journal of Marketing vol. 18(4), 36–44.
Hardy, W. (2001).QoS — Measurement and Evaluation of Telecommunications Quality of Service. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
Hyperfomix, Inc. (2001).Analytic Modeling or Simulation Modeling. Hyperfomix, Inc. White Paper, Austin, TX.
Johnson, J. (2001). Why MPLS Matters in Carrier Networks.Network World vol. 18(31), 24–5.
Lynch, R. (2000).Corporate Strategy, 2 nd ed. Financial Times/Prentice Hall, Essex, UK.
Mullins, J. and Sutherland, D. (1998). New Product Development in Rapidly Changing Markets: An Exploratory Study.Journal of New Product Development vol. 15(3), 224–36.
Oliver, R. (1997).Satisfaction: A behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. and Berry, L.L. (1985). A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research.Journal of Marketing vol. 49(4), 41–50.
Robertazzi, T. (1999).Planning Telecommunication Networks. IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ.
Zeithaml, V., Parasuraman, A. and Berry, L.L. (1990).Delivering Quality Service. Free Press, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ludwick, D.P., Grant, D.B. Simulation models and quality of service in IP-based networks — an exploratory investigation. Oper Res Int J 2, 71–84 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02940122
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02940122