Skip to main content
Log in

Hypertext as a tool for the metatheoretical analysis of learning theories: The TIP database

  • Published:
Journal of Computing in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

THIS ARTICLE discusses the metatheoretical aspects of a hypertext database about learning and instructional theory. The links among 45 theories, 18 concepts, and 17 learning domains are analyzed. The highest number of links were between theories and concepts or domains; there were relatively few links among theories themselves. The results of this analysis suggest that different theories of learning and instruction have less overlap than is commonly supposed. The value of this kind of tool for research and practice is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrett, E. (1989).The Society of Text: Hypertext, Hypermedia and the Social Construction of Information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, E. & Devlin, J. (1991).The Hypertext/Hypermedia Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botafogo, R., Rivlin, E., & Shneiderman, B. (1991).Structural analysis of hypertexts: Identifying hierarchies and useful metrics.Department Computer Science, University of Maryland.

  • Dede, C. (1991).Designing a tool for imaging mental models underlying training. In L. Birnbaum (Ed.),Proceedings of the International Conference on the Learning Sciences. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delany, P. & Landow, G. (1991).Hypermedia and Literary Studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, E. (1989). Structuring knowledge bases for designers of learning materials.Hypertext, 1(1), 20–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. & Mandl, H. (1990).Designing Hypermedia for Learning. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAleese, R. & Green, C. (1990).Hypertext: State of the Art. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman, B. & Kearsley, G. (1989).Hypertext Hands-On Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

Bibliography

  • Anderson, J. (1983).The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. & Schon, D. (1974).Theory in Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R.C., Bower, G., & Crothers, E.J. (1965).An Introduction to Mathematical Learning Theory. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel, D. (1963).The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning. New York: Grune & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986).Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1973).Going Beyond the Information Given. New York: Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, S., Moran, T., & Newell, A. (1983).The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J.M. (1990).The Nurnberg Funnel. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cermak, L., & Craik, F. (1979).Levels of Processing in Human Memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L., & Snow, R. (1977).Aptitudes and Instuctional Methods: A Handbook for Research on Interactions. New York: Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, K.P. (1981).Adults as Learners. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBono, E. (1967).New Think: The Use of Lateral Thinking in the Generation of New Ideas. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, W.K. (1970).Learning Theory and Mental Development. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957).A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagne, R. (1985).The Conditions of Learning (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1983).Frames of Mind. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J.J. (1979).The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J.P. (1967).The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, E.R. (1935).The Psychology of Learning. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, C. (1943).Principles of Behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M. (1984).The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species (3rd Ed.). Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landa, L. (1976).Instructional Regulation and Control: Cybernetics, Algorithmization, and Heuristics in Education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mager, R. (1988).Making Instruction Work. Belmont, CA: Lake Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltzman, I. (1960). On the training of originality.Psychological Review, 67(4), 229–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M.D. (1983). Component Display Theory. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional Design Theories and Models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates, p. 90–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G.A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K.H. (1960).Plans and the Structure of Behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. (1990).Unified Theories of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., & Simon, H. (1972).Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. (1982).Learning and Memory. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1971).Imagery and Verbal Processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pask, G. (1975).Conversation, Cognition, and Learning. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional Design Theories and Models.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

  • Rogers, C.R. (1969).Freedom to Learn. Columbus, OH: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (1979).Interaction of Media, Cognition, and Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scandura, J. (1977).Problem Solving: A Structural/Process Approach with Instructional Applications. NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R.C. & Abelson, R. (1977).Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding. Hillsale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. (1985).Mathematical Problem Solving. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B.F. (1968).The Technology of Teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, R.J. & Jehng, J. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the non-linear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.),Cognition, Education, and Multimedia (pp. 163–205). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R.J. (1985).Beyond IQ. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sticht, T., Armstrong, W., Hickey, D., & Caylor, J. (1987).Cast-off Youth: Policy and Training Methods from the Military Experience. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. (1932).The Fundamentals of Learning. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, E.C. (1932).Purposive Behavior in Animals and Men. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanLehn, K. (1990).Mind Bugs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S. (1978).Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, M. (1959).Productive Thinking (Enlarged Ed.). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Greg Kearsley.

Additional information

Greg Kearsley is an adjunct professor in the department of Educational Leadership in the School of Education and Human Development at the George Washington University in Washington, D.C., where he teaches graduate courses and conducts research in the area of educational technology. Dr. Kearsley has written many books and articles on the subject of technology and education. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Alberta in 1978.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kearsley, G. Hypertext as a tool for the metatheoretical analysis of learning theories: The TIP database. J. Comput. High. Educ. 4, 43–56 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02941064

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02941064

keywords

Navigation