Skip to main content
Log in

An AHP model for construction contractor prequalification

  • Published:
Operational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given that contractor plays a critical role in any construction project, contractor selection constitutes key decision for public authorities. Prequalification, i.e. the elimination of incompetent contractors from the bidding process according to a predetermined set of criteria, is a frequently practiced procedure in many countries, including Greece. In order to enhance the performance levels of selected contractors and to minimize failures in meeting client’s objectives, several criteria must be taken into account and a consistent evaluation methodology must be applied. We propose a multicriteria decision making approach, based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), for supporting public authorities in contractor prequalification. The decision problem is decomposed into qualitative criteria and sub-criteria that are further analyzed in quantitative indicators on which the candidate contractors are evaluated. Our advisory decision support system is an appropriate tool for at least three reasons: First, various criteria are included, in order to ensure the quality of the completed product. Second, it is easy to use, because, on the one hand, it requires no prior knowledge of multicriteria methods from the potential users; and, on the other hand, it minimizes subjective judgments. Finally, the model minimizes the required pairwise comparisons, which is considered to be a major default of AHP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alacrón L.F. and Mourges C. (2002). Performance modeling for contractor selection. Journal of Management in Engineering, 18(2), 52–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Subhi Al-Harbi K.M. (2001). Application of the AHP in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 19, 19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alsugair A.M. (1999). Framework for evaluating bids of construction contractors. Journal of Management in Engineering, 15(2), 72–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anagnostopoulos K.P., Gatsios N. and Vavatsikos A. (2004). Final contractor selection using a multicriteria methodology. In Proceedings of the 3rd Scientific Conference on Project Management, “Clustering in Construction Project Management”, Editor: J.P. Pantouvakis (CD).

  • Fong P.S.-W. and Choi S.K.-Y. (2000). Final contractor selection using the Analytical Hierarchy Process. Construction Management and Economics, 18, 547–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman E.H. and Selly M.A. (2002). Decision by objectives. World Scientific Publications.

  • Gerontas A. (2000). Law of public works: The administrative contract of public work. A.N. Sakkoulas Editions, Athens-Komotini (in greek).

  • Hatush Z. and Skitmore M. (1997), Criteria for contractor selection. Construction Management and Economics, 15, 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatush Z. and Skitmore M. (1998). Contractor selection using multicriteria utility theory: An additive model. Building and Environment, 33(2-3), 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt G.D. (1996). Applying cluster analysis to contractor classification. Building and Environment, 31(6), 557–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt G.D. (1998). Which contractor selection methodology?. International Journal of Project Management, 16, No. 3, 153–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt G.D., Olomolaiye P.O. and Harris F.C. (1995a). Application of an alternative contractor selection model. Building Research and Information, 23(5), 255–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt G.D., Olomolaiye P.O. and Harris F.C. (1995b). Applying multi-attribute analysis to contractor selection decisions. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 1(3), 139–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt G.D., Olomolaiye P.O. and Harris F.C. (1995c). A review of contractor selection practice in the U.K. construction industry. Building and Environment, 30(4), 553–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaselskis E.J. and Russell J.S. (1992). Risk analysis approach to selection of contractor evaluation method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(4), 814–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumaraswamy M.M. (1996). Contractor evaluation and selection: a Hong Kong perspective. Building and Environment, 31, No. 3, 273–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin C-T. and Chen Y-T. (2004). Bid/no-bid decision-making a fuzzy linguistic approach. International Journal of Project Management, 22, 585–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng S.T. and Skitmore R.M. (1999). Client and consultant perspectives of prequalification criteria. Building and Environment, 34, 607–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen V.U. (1985). Tender evaluation by fuzzy sets. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 111, 231–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palaneeswaran E. and Kumaraswamy M.M. (2001). Recent advances and proposed improvements in contractor prequalification methodologies. Building and Environment, 36, 73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RICS (1997). The effect of competitive tendering on value in construction, RICS Research Paper Series, 2(5), Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell J.S. and Skibniewski M.J. (1988). Decision criteria in contractor prequalification. Journal of Management in Engineering, 4(2), 148–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell J.S. and Skibniewski M.J. (1990). Qualifier 1: Contractor prequalification model. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 4(1), 77–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell J.S., Skibniewski M.J. and Cozier D.R. (1990). Qualifier 2: Knowledge based system for contractor prequalification. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 116(1), 157–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty T.L. (1990). How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 9–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty T.L. (1995). Decision making for leaders, 3rd Edition. RWS Publications.

  • Saaty T.L. and Vargas L.G. (1994). Decision making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS Publications.

  • Simon H. A. (1996). The architecture of complexity. In The sciences of the artificial, MIT Press.

  • Skitmore R.M. and Marsden D.E. (1988). Which procurement system? Towards a universal procurement technique. Construction Management and Economics, 6, 71–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sönmez M., Holt G.D., Yang J.B. and Graham G. (2002). Applying evidential reasoning to prequalifying construction contractors. Journal of Management in Engineering, 18(3), 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topcu Y.I. (2004). A decision model proposal for construction contractor selection in Turkey. Building and Environment, 39, 469–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargas L.G. (1990). An overview of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and its applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 2–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anagnostopoulos, K.P., Vavatsikos, A.P. An AHP model for construction contractor prequalification. Oper Res Int J 6, 333–346 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02941261

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02941261

Keywords

Navigation