Skip to main content
Log in

Disproof of a Conjecture in the Domination Theory

  • Published:
Graphs and Combinatorics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In [1] C. Barefoot, F. Harary and K. Jones conjectured that for cubic graphs with connectivity three the difference between the domination and independent domination numbers is at most one. We disprove this conjecture and give an exhaustive answer to the question: “What is the difference between the domination and independent domination numbers for cubic graphs with given connectivity?”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barefoot, F., Jones, K.F.: What is the difference between the domination and independent domination numbers of a cubic graph? Graphs and Combin. 7, 205–208 (1991)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. F.: Graph Theory. Reading: Addison-Wesley 1969

  3. Mynhardt, G: On the difference between the domination and independent domination numbers of cubic graphs. Theory of Graphs and Applications, New York: Wiley 1991

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zverovich, I.E., Zverovich, V.E. Disproof of a Conjecture in the Domination Theory. Graphs and Combinatorics 10, 389–396 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02986690

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02986690

Keywords

Navigation