Skip to main content
Log in

Web-based interorganizational information systems for logistics outsourcing

Système d’information interorganisationnel assisté par le web pour l’impartition logistique

  • Published:
Annales Des Télécommunications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines how web-based interorganizational information systems(ios)can efficiently support coordination mechanisms between outsourcer and third party logistics (3PL). First, we review the literature on coordination mechanisms andios. Second, we report on the methodology used for gathering information on outsourcers and 3PLs. Third, armed with limited but quality data, we identified two fundamental dimensions: 3PL involvement andios impacts on logistics outsourcing decisions. By combining the two dimensions, we propose a conceptual framework that highlights four main categories ofios that we characterize as neutralios, supply chainios, strategicios and dynamicios. After characterizing and analyzing each category, we discuss how these web basedios support outsourcers and 3PL along the supply chain. Finally, the article discusses the framework’s relevancy and its limits.

Résumé

L’article examine comment un système d’information interorganisationnel (siio) assisté par le web peut efficacement appuyer les mécanismes de coordination entre donneur d’ordre et sous-traitant logistique. L’article passe en revue, d’abord, la littérature portant sur les mécanismes de coordination et du rôle que lesiio y joue. Deuxièmement, on expose la méthodologie utilisée pour ramasser les données sur les donneurs d’ordre et sous-traitants logistiques. Troisièmement, nous avons identifié deux dimensions fondamentales: niveau d’engagement du sous-traitant logistique et impact dusiio sur le donneur d’ordre. La combinaison de ces deux dimensions nous permet de proposer un cadre conceptuel et d’identifier quatre catégories desiio pour l’impartition logistique que nous appelons:siio neutre,siio-chaîne d’approvisionnement,siio stratégique et enfinsiio dynamique. Après avoir caractérisé et analysé chaque catégorie, nous discutons comment cessiio assistent les partenaires le long de la chaîne d’approvisionnement. Enfin, l’article discute la pertinence du cadre conceptuel et de ses limites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alt (R.), Fleisch (E.) (2002), “Business Networking Systems: Characteristics and Lessons Learned”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce,2, pp. 7–28.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson (D.L.), Lee (H.L.) (1999), “Synchronized Supply Chains: The New Frontier”, InAchieving Supply Chain Excellence Through Technology, Edited by D. Anderson, Montgomery Research,USA.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amami (M.), Nature des Marchés Électroniques. Systèmes d’Information et Management, 2002, no 1.

  4. Bakos (Y.) (1991), “Electronic Marketplaces”,MIS Quarterly, September, pp. 295–310.

  5. Beamon (B.M.) (1999), “Measuring supply chain performance”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management,19, no 3, p. 275 +.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Benjamin (R.), Wigand (R.) (1995), “Electronic Markets and virtual Value Chains on the Information Superhighway”, Sloan Management Review, Winter, pp. 62–72.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bensaou (M.), Venkatraman (N.) (1995), “Configurations of Interorganizational Relationships: A comparison betweenU.S. and Japanese Automakers”, Management Sc.,41, pp. 1471–1492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bovet (D.) (1990), “Logistics Strategies for Europe in the Nineties”, Planning Review,19, no 4, pp. 12–15.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Burbridge Jr. (J.J.) (1986), “Logistics Information System for Distribution Management Goes Beyond Total Cost Approach”, Industrial Engineering, August, pp. 42–49.

  10. Cachon (G. P.), Fisher (M.) (2000), “Supply chain inventory management and the value of shared information”, Management Science,46, no 8, pp.1032–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cash (J.I.), Konsynski (B.R.) (1985), “IS Redraws Boundaries”, Harvard Business Review,63, no 2, pp. 134–142.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Clemons (E.K.), Row (M.) (1988), “McKesson Drug company: A Case Study of Economost — A strategic Information System”, Journal of Management Information Systems,5, no 1, pp. 37–50

    Google Scholar 

  13. Daft (R.L.), Lengel (R.H.) (1986), “Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design”, Management Science32, no 5, pp. 554–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Daugherty (P.J.), Sabath (R.E.), Rogers (D.S.) (1992), “Competitive Advantage through Customer Responsiveness”, Logistics and Transportation Review,28, #3, pp. 257–271.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Den Hengst (M.),Sol (H.G.) (2001), “The Impact of Information and Communication Technology on Interorganizational Coordination”, InProceedings of the Thirty-fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii,USA, January, pp. 2216–25.

  16. Diana (F.) (2001), “Fast, Focused, and Flexible: Focusing on Core Competencies and Leveraging Partner Abilities can Drive Business Success”, Intelligent Enterprise, November 12.

  17. Galaskiewicz (J.) (1985), Social organization of an Urban Grants Economy, Irwin,NY.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Galbraith (J.R.) (1977), Organization Design, Addison-Wesley, ReadingCMA.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gantz (J.) (1990), “Outsourcing: Threat or Salvation?,” Networking Management, October, pp. 25–40.

  20. Grover (V.), Teng (J.T.C.) (2001), “E-commerce and the information market”, Communications of theACM,44, no 4, pp. 79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Horvath (L.) (2001), “Collaboration: the key to value creation in supply chain management”, Supply Chain Management,6, no 5, pp. 205–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Huber (G.) (1984), “The Nature and Design of Post-industrial Organizations”, Management Sci.,30, no 8, pp. 928–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. IIE Solutions (2000), August, 11.

  24. Jensen (M.),Meckling (W.) (1976), “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure”, Journal of Financial Economics,3.

  25. Johnston (R.), Vitale (M.) (1988), “Creating Competitive Advantage With Interorganizational Information Systems”,MIS Quarterly,12, pp. 153–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Keskinocak (P.), Tayur (S.) (2001), “Quantitative Analysis for Internet-Enabled Supply Chains”, Interfaces,31, no 2, pp. 70–89.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Kogut (B.) (1988), “Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives”, Strategic Management Journal,9, pp. 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kumar (K.) (2001), “Technologies for Supporting Supply Chain Management”, communications of theACM,44, no 6, pp. 58–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee (H.L.), Whang (S.) (2000), “Information Sharing in a Supply Chain”, International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management,20, nos. 3/4, pp. 373–383.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lee (H.L.) (2000), “Creating Value through Supply Chain Integration”, Supply Chain Management, Sep/Oct., http://www.manufacturing.net/scl/scmr/scm0016/integration_1.html.

  31. Lee (H.L.), Padmanabhan (V.), Whang (S.) (1997), “Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect”, Management Science,43, no 4, pp. 546–558.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Malone (T.W.), Yates (J.), Benjamin (R.I.) (1987), “Electronic Markets and Electronic Hierarchies”, Comm. of the ACM,30, no 6, pp 484–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. March (J.G.), Simon (H.A.) (1958), Organizations, John Wiley, New York,NY.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Massetti (B.),Zmud (R.W.) (1996), “Measuring the Extent ofEDI Usage in Complex Organizations: Strategies and Illustrative Examples”,MIS Quarterly, pp.

  35. McGinnis (M.), Mele Vallopra (R.) (2001) “Managing Supplier Involvement in Process Improvement in Manufacturing”, Journal of Supply Chain Management,37, no 3, pp. 48–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. McIvor (R.) (2000), “A practical framework for understanding the outsourcing process”, Supply Chain Management,5, no 1, p. 22+.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Miller (D.), Friesen (P.H.) (1984), Organizations: a quantum View, Prentice-Hall, Englewood-Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Oliver (C.) (1990), “Determinants of Interorganizational relationships: Integration and future direction”, Academy of Management Review,15, pp. 241–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Olterman (R.) (1994), “To Outsource or Not”, Canadian Transportation Logistics, pp. 39–41.

  40. Pfeffer (J.), Salancik (G.) (1978), The External Control of Organization, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Phalen (R.M.) (1992), “Outsourcing: The Strategic Decision Making Process.” Perspective on Outsourcing, American Bankers Association, pp.113–120.

  42. Prahalad (Ck.), Hamel (G.) (1990), “The core competence of the corporation”,Harvard Business Review 68, May, 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rao (K.), Young (R.), Novick (J.) (1993), “Third Party Logistics of Global firms”, Logistics and Transportation Review,29, no 4, pp. 363–370.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sadhwani (A.),Sahran (M.) (1987), “Electronic Systems EnhanceJIT Operations”, Management Accounting, pp. 25–30.

  45. Simon (H.A.) (1973), “Applying Information Technology to Organization Design” Public Administration Review, pp. ???

  46. Srinivasan (K.), Kekre (S.), Mukhopadhyay (T.) (1994), “Impact of Electronic Data Interchange Technology onJIT Shipments”, Management Science,40, no 10, October, pp. 1291–1304.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Thompson (J.D.) (1967), Organizations in Action, McGraw-Hill,NY.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Van De Ven (A.W.),Ferry (D.L.) (1980),Measuring and Assessing Organizations, John Wiley & Sons.

  49. Venkatesan (R.) (1992), “Strategic sourcing: to make or not to make”,Harvard Business Review, November–December, 98–107.

  50. Virum (H.) (1993), “Third Party Logistics Development in Europe”, Logistics and Transportation Review,29, no 4, pp. 355–361.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Vonderemse (M.A.), Tracey (M.) (1999), “The impact of supplier selection criteria and supplier involvement on manufacturing performance”, The Journal of supply chain management,1, no 2, pp.33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Welch (J.A.), Nayak (P.R.) (1992), “Strategic Sourcing: A Progressive Approach to the Make-or-Buy Decision”, The Executive,14, no 1, February, pp. 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Williamson (O.E.) (1979) “Transaction Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations”, Journal of Law and Economics,22, pp. 233–361

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  54. Williamson (O.E.) (1987), “The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach”, Journal of Law and Economics,87, no 3, pp. 548–576.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wilson (J.W.),Dobrzynski (J.H.) (1986), “The Post-Industrial Corporation”, Business Week, March 3, p. 64.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mokhtar Amami.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amami, M., Brimberg, J. Web-based interorganizational information systems for logistics outsourcing. Ann. Télécommun. 58, 266–296 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03001014

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03001014

Key words

Mots clés

Navigation