Skip to main content
Log in

Mesure du Débit d’Absorption Spécifique (das) des téléphones mobiles — contribution du projetcomobio à la normalisation internationale

Measurement of Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) on mobile phones — Comobio project contribution to international standards

  • Published:
Annales Des Télécommunications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Résumé

Le niveau d’exposition des personnes aux champs électromagnétiques émis par les téléphones mobiles est caractérisé par ledas (Débit d’absorption spécifique) ousar (Specific Absorption Rate). Cette valeur correspond à la puissance absorbée par unité de masse de tissus. Elle est utilisée pour définir les restrictions de base dans le cadre des limites d’exposition des personnes aux champs électromagnétiques. Les laboratoires de recherche universitaires et industriels français, réunis au sein du sous-projet 1 decomobio ont contribué à l’élaboration des normes internationales pour la certification des téléphones mobiles.

Abstract

Human exposure to electromagnetic fields emitted by mobile phones is characterised by the Specific Absorption Rate (sar). This value corresponds to therf power absorbed by unitary mass of the equivalent tissue. It represents the basic restriction used to define limit of human exposure torf electromagnetic fields. Academic and industrial labs have contributed through thecomobio project to define international standards for mobile phones certification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliographie

  1. icnirp Guidelines, “Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz)”, Health Physics, April 1998, 74, no 4, pp. 494–522.

  2. IEEE C95.1, “IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz”,IEEE, September 1991, revised in 1999.

  3. env50166-2, “Human exposure to electromagnetic fields — High frequency (10 kHz to 300 GHz)”,cenelec, January 1995, withdrawn in 1999.

  4. c18-610, “Exposition humaine aux champs électromagnétiques hautes fréquence (10 kHz à 300 GHz)”,ute, November 1995, annulée partiellement en 2000.

  5. fcc 96-326, “Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation”,fcc, August 1996.

  6. 1999/519/ce, “Recommandation du Conseil du 12 juillet 1999 relative à la limitation de l’exposition du public aux champs électromagnétiques (de 0 Hz à 300 GHz)”.

  7. prES59005, “Considerations for evaluation of human exposure to electromagnetic fields (emfs) from Mmobile Telecommunication Equipment (mte) in the frequency range 30 MHz — 6 GHz”,cenelec, December 1997,now withdrawn.

  8. oet Bulletin 65, Supplement C, “Evaluating Compliance withfcc Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields; Additional Information for Evaluating Compliance of Mobile and Portable Devices withfcc Limits for Human exposure to Radiofrequency Emissions”,fcc, December 1997, (NB: révision éditée en juin 2001).

  9. Gordon et al., 1988 Anthropometric Survey of US Army Personnel: Methods and Summary Statistics,Technical Report natick/tr-89/044 (1989).

  10. Drossos (A.), Santomaa (V.), Kuster (N.), “The dependence of electromagnetic energy absorption upon human head tissue composition in the frequency range of 300–3000 MHz”,IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 48, no 11, pp. 1988–1995, Nov. 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Márquez (J.)et al., “Laser scan acquisition of head models for dosimetry of hand-held mobile phones”,Proceedings of the 22 nd annual Meeting of the Bioelectromagnetics Society, Munich, June 2000.

  12. Wiart (J.)et al., “Calculation of the Power Deposited in Tissues close to a Handset Antenna using a Non-uniformfdtd”, Electricity and Magnetism in Biology and Medicine, F. Bersani ed,KluwerAcademic/Plenum Press Publishers, N.Y., 1999.

  13. en50361, “Basic standard for the measurement of Specific Absorption Rate related to human exposure to electromagnetic fields from mobile phones (300 MHz — 3 GHz)”,cenelec, July 2001

  14. en50360, “Product standard to demonstrate the compliance of mobile telephones with the basic restrictions related to human exposure to electromagnetic fields from mobile phones (300 MHz — 3 GHz)”,cenelec, July 2001

  15. IEEE standardp1528-200, “Recommended Practice for Determining the Peak Spatial-Average Specific Absorption Rate (sar) in the Human Body Due to Wireless Communications Devices: Experimental Techniques”, IEEE.

  16. iec pt62209, “Evaluation of the Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Fields from Wireless Communication Devices (Human models, Instrumentation, and Procedures); Procedure to determine the Specific Absorption Rate (sar) for hand-held mobile telephones in the frequency range of 300 MHz to 3 GHz”,iec.

  17. Wennberg (A.), “Biomedical effects of electromagnetic fields — Final report of thecost action 244bis”, Stockholm

  18. Person (C.),Ahlonsou (L.N.)et al., “New reference antennas forsar probe calibration in tissue equivalent liquid”,Proceedings of the Millenium Conference on Antennas and Propagation, AP’2000, Davos, Switzerland, April 9–14, 2000.

  19. Person (C.)et al, “New test bench for the characterization ofsar measurement probes used in tissue equivalent liquid”,Proceeding of the 22 nd Annual Meeting of the Bioelectromagnetics Society, Munich, June 2000.

  20. Picard (D.)et al, “Global and easy-to-use calibration of dosimetric probes”,Proceeding of the 22 nd Annual Meeting of the Bioelectromagnetics Society, Munich, June 2000.

  21. Picard (D.)et al, “Rapid near-field antenna testing via arrays of modulated scattering probes,IEEE Trans. on Antennas and Propagation, 36, pp. 804–814, June 1988

  22. Picard (D.)et al, “Real time analyser of antenna near-field distribution”,Proc. 22nd European Microwave Conference, 1, pp. 509–514, Espoo, Finland, 24–27 August 1992.

  23. Monebhurrun (V.)et al, “Liquid and shape characterization for homogeneous phantom used for mobile phone certification”,Proceeding of the 5st International Congress of the European BioElectromagnetics association (ebea), Helsinki, September 2001.

  24. Picard (D.)et al, “Low invasive measurement set-up for electromagnetic field level induced in biological tissues by generic transceivers”,ebea Nancy’96, Nancy, Février 1996

  25. Picard (D.)et al, “Application of the modulated scattering technique to the dosimetry of mobile phones”BEMS Munich, May 2000

  26. «Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurements»,iec, 1995.

  27. «Guide pour l’expression de l’incertitude de mesure»,afnor, XP X 07-020, juin 1996.

  28. Ahlonsou (L.N.)et al., “Uncertainty Evaluation ofsar Measurements of hand held mobile phones”,Proceedings of the 22 nd annual Meeting of the Bioelectromagnetics Society, Munich, June 2000.

  29. Dale (C.)et al, “Representativity of homogeneous phantoms in testing compliance of mobile phones tosar limits”,Proceeding of the 22 nd Annual Meeting of the Bioelectromagnetics Society, Munich, June 2000.

  30. Monebhurrun (V.)et al, “A numerical approach for the determination of the tissue equivalent liquid used duringsarassessment”,Proceeding of the compumag conference, Evian, July 2001.

  31. Monebhurrun (V.),Dale (C.)et al, “A Numerical Approach for the Determination of the Tissue Equivalent Liquid used duringsar Assessments”,Transactions on Magnetics, March 2002.

  32. Ahlonsou (L.N.)et al, “Comparison of three different post-processing schemes forsar assessment”,Proceeding of the 5st International Congress of the European BioElectromagnetics Association (ebea), Helsinki, September 2001.

  33. Person (C.)et al, “A new generation ofsar test equipment for mobile phone certification”,Proceeding of the 5st International Congress of the European BioElectromagnetics Association (ebea), Helsinki, September 2001.

  34. Grangeat (C.), “Contribution to the standardisation ofsar measurements of mobile phones”,Proceedings of the Millenium Conference on Antennas and Propagation, AP’2000, Davos, Switzerland, April 9–14, 2000.

  35. Grangeat (C.)et al., “Comprehensive procedure for dosimetry for the characterization of RF radiation of hand-held terminals”,Proceeding of the 17 th Annual Meeting of the Bioelectromagnetics Society, Boston, June 1995.

  36. Grangeat (C.), “Radiofrequency radiation from mobile phones”,Alcatel Telecommunications Review, 4th Quarter 1998, pp.298–304.

  37. Correia (L.), “cost 25 g book: wireless system for personal communications”,J. Wiley & Sons, 2001.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christophe Grangeat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grangeat, C., Person, C., Picard, D. et al. Mesure du Débit d’Absorption Spécifique (das) des téléphones mobiles — contribution du projetcomobio à la normalisation internationale. Ann. Télécommun. 58, 740–765 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03001528

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03001528

Mots clés

Key words

Navigation