Abstract
THE AUTHOR CREATED A NUMBER OF WEB SITES to enhance traditional classroom instruction in computer science courses. These Web sites included lecture notes, assignments, downloadable programs, links to sites related to the course subject matter, and a program allowing students to see their grades on all assignments and tests and thus determine exactly where they stood in the course at any time.
This study reports on two types of data analyzed to gain insight into students’ use of the site: responses to an author-created survey and students’ final grades. Students demonstrated strong positive reactions to the course Web site on the survey and showed statistically significant final grade improvement after the Web site was introduced. While these results should be interpreted conservatively due to the large number of uncontrolled variables that affect student performance, they are nonetheless encouraging enough to warrant continued effort to develop and evaluate course Web sites.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alstrum, V. L., Dale, N., Berglund, A., Granger, M., Little, J. C., Miller, D.M., Petre, M., Schragger, P., & Springsteel, F. (1996). Evaluation: Turning technology from toy to tool.ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 28, 201–217.
Biehler, R. F. (1971).Psychology applied to teaching. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin Company.
Dehoney, J., & Reeves, T.C. (1999). Instructional and social dimensions of class Web pages.Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 10(2), 19–41.
Ehrmann, S. C. (1995). Asking the right questions: what does research tell us about technology and higher learning?Change, 27(2), 20–27.
Fitzelle, G. T., Jr., & Trochim, W. M. K. (1996, November).Survey evaluation of Web site instructional technology: does it increase student learning? Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association, Atlanta, GA. [Online] Available: http://trochim.human.cornell.edu/webeval/webques/webques.htm.)
Gilbert, S.W. (1998).Lazy students & faculty? Posting to the Teaching, Learning, and Technology2 ListServ of the American Association for Higher Education9 dated February 5, 1998, message number AAHESGIT 2.
Jordan, D. (1997).Evaluation of a Web site as a teaching tool in MMW-1 (track C). Unpublished manuscript, University of California, San Diego.
Kulik, C.C., & Kulik, J.A. (1991). Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis.Computers in Human Behavior, 7(1–2), 75–94.
Rasmussen, S. (1992). An introduction to statistics with data analysis. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Grove, CA. Also personal conversations, Spring 1998.
Trochim, W. (1996, November).Evaluating Web sites: Introduction. Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association, Atlanta, GA. [ONLINE] Available: http://trochim.human.cornell.edu/webeval/intro.htm.)
Williams Glaser, C. (1998).Creating New Standards for Higher Education: Effecting Pedagogical Change in the Undergraduate Curriculum through the Integration of Technology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Peabody College of Education and Human Development, Vanderbilt University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
ABOUT THE AUTHOR Jesse M. Heines is an Associate Professor in the Department of Computer Science at University of Massachusetts Lowell. He has been on sabbatical for the 1999–2000 academic year, serving as a Visiting Scholar at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Center for Educational Computing Initiatives. Heines specializes in the implementation of graphical user interfaces (GUIs) in interactive programs. He is the owner of CBT Artisan, Inc., a consulting firm founded in 1985 that provides training and programming services for GUI-based applications.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heines, J.M. Evaluating the effect of a course Web site on student performance. J. Comput. High. Educ. 12, 57–83 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03032714
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03032714