Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Caractérisation de Flux et Qualité de Service Pour Systèmes de Combat Futurs

Data stream characterization and quality of service for future combat systems

  • Published:
Annales Des Télécommunications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Résumé

Le système de combat du futur s’appuie sur un nombre toujours plus important de capteurs disséminés sur différents porteurs ou placés le long des côtes. Afin de détecter, identifier et suivre les cibles potentielles, des flux de données, dont les exigences de performances vis à vis des supports de transmission sont variées [Arq 02], circulent entre les composants du système de combat. Recueillies puis traitées à différents niveaux, les données doivent être converties dans un format permettant un transport optimal afin de favoriser une prise de décision rapide. Cet article étudie comment utiliser des segments de l’Internet civil au sein d’une architecture bout-en-bout via l’utilisation d’un protocole de gestion de la qualité de service garantissant des services différenciés selon le type de données transportées.

Abstract

Futur combat systems will rely on the use of remote sensors to detect, identify and track targets. Embedded or deployed along coasts, these sensors generate data streams requiring various garanteed services from the networks. Sensor datas must be collected, processed and transported in a format making easy quick and accurate decisions. We focus on providing multiple quality of service (differentiated services) on a so called tactical internet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliographie

  1. Aalto (S.),Nybero (E.), Flow level models of DiffServ packet level mechanisms,Nts-16, Espoo Finland, 08 2002.

  2. Alspaugh (Ch.),Legaspi (A. K.), A violation of order: IP-QoS for tactical traffic,Ieee Milcom, 2002.

  3. Arques (F. X.),Enel (L.), Modélisation des sources de données et du contexte opérationnel en simulation de systèmes de communications embarqués sécurisés,Rstd No57, 2002.

  4. Arques (F. X.),Enel (L.), Sécurisation de données temps réel par flux multiples et application à un système de combat surAtm,Rstd No60, 2003.

  5. Comer (D.),Tcp/ip,Dunod, 2001.

  6. Diot (C), Reliability multicast services and protocols; a survey,International Conference on Local and Metropolitan Communication Systems, Chapman & Hall Editor, Kyoto, December 1994.

  7. Schmidt (D. C),Schantz (R. E.),Masters (M. W.),Cross (J. K.),Sharp (D. C.)Dipalma (L. P.), Towards adaptive and reflective middleware for network-centric combat systems,CrossTalk, Novembre 2001.

  8. Enel (L.),Guillem (E), Application ofAtm Network Techniques to New Naval Combat Systems,Ictta 2004, Damas, Apr. 2004.

  9. Ferrari (T.),Pau (G.),Raffaelli (C), Priority Queuing Applied to Expedited Forwarding : a Measurement-Based Analysis,QofIS’2000, Berlin, March 2000.

  10. Fonseca (M.),Agoulmine (N.),Ghamri-Doudane (Y.),Achir (N.),Pujolle (G.), Une nouvelle architecture de gestion de réseaux DiffServ basée sur la technologie de réseau actif et la gestion à base de règles,Annales des Télécommunications,59, no 5–6, 2004.

  11. France Télécom r&d,Memento technique, no 15, chap 3, Mars 2000.

  12. Freebersyer (J. A.),Macker (J. P.), Realizing the network-centric warfare vision: network technology challenges and guidelines,Ieee Milcom, 2001.

  13. Hofmann (U.),Pfeiffenberger (T.),Hechenleitner (B.), One-Way-Delay Measurements withCm Toolset,Ipccc 2000, PhonixUsa, 2000.

  14. Huang (Z.),Shen (C. C),Srisathapornphat (Ch.),Jaikaeo (Ch.), A busy-tone based directional mac for ad hoc networks,Ieee Milcom, 2002.

  15. Hunt (R.), A review of QoS mechanisms in IP-based networks — IntServ and DiffServ,Mls, mpls and traffic engineering,Computer Communications, 25, pp. 100–108, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hopkins (J.), The Cooperative Engagement Capability,Apl. Technical Digest,16, no 4, 1995.

  17. Kallgren (D. G.),Smaal (J. G.),Ip unicast/multicast operation over stanag 5066,Ieee Milcom, 2001.

  18. Mil-std-1553b and the Next Generation: Conference Proceedings, London, 29–30 November 1989.

  19. Minet (P.), Performance evaluation ofGam-t-103 Real-time transfer protocols,Ieee infocom 89, Ottawa, Apr. 1989.

  20. Nandy (B.),Seddigh (N.),Pieda (P.), Diffserv’s Assured ForwardingPhb: What Assurance does the Customer Have?,nossdav, 1999, June 23–25, Basking Ridge,Nj, usa.

  21. Nemeroff (J.),Garcia (L.),Hampel (D.),Dipierro (S.), Application of sensor network communications,Ieee milcom, 2001.

  22. Committee on Network-Centric Naval Forces, Naval Studies Board, National Research Council, Network-Centric Naval Forces: A Transition Strategy for Enhancing Operational Capabilities,The national academies press, 2000.

  23. Resource Reservation Protocol, Request For Comment (Rfc), no 2205, 1997.

  24. A Framework for QoS-Based Routing in the Internet, Request For Comment (Rfc), no 2386, 1998.

  25. Assured ForwardingPhb Group, Request For Comment (Rfc), no 2597, 1999.

  26. An Expedited ForwardingPhb,Request For Comment (rfc), no 2598, 1999.

  27. New Terminology and Clarifications for DiffServ, Request For Comment (Rfc), no 3260, 2002.

  28. Rtp: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications , Request For Comment (Rfc), no 3550, 2003.

  29. Sholander (P.),Harris (A.),Brown (J.), Intersensor information assurance forDod tactical networks,Ieee Milcom, 2002.

  30. Stanag 5516, Tactical Data Exchange — Link 16,Otan, March 1990.

  31. Strayer (W. T.),Weaver (A. C.), Evaluation of transport protocols for real-time communication,Computer Science, Report NoTr-88-18, June 1988.

  32. Thales,Defense Business Area Newsletter, Oct. 2002.

  33. Thales, Combat systems, Towards a system of systems, View no 9, June 2003.

  34. Vivier (G.),Bonnet (Ch.),Al Agha (K.),Samu project: tests and improvement ofUmts for users in a car,Ieee vtc 02, Birmingham, Alabama,Usa, May 2002.

  35. Walrod (J.), Sensor and actuator networks for acoustic signature monitoring and control,Undersea Defence Technology, 1999.

  36. Wang (F),Mohapatra (P.),Mukherjee (S.),Bushmitch (D.), An efficient bandwidth management scheme for real-time Internet applications,Computer Communications, no 25, pp. 1596–1605, 2002.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut des Sciences de l’Ingénieur de Toulon et du Var, Université du Sud Toulon Var, lab sis/td, BP 56, 8316 2, La Valette Cedex, France

    Laurent Enel

  2. Centre Technique des Systèmes Navals, BP 77, 83800, Toulon Naval, France

    Ludovic Martinet

Authors
  1. Laurent Enel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ludovic Martinet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Enel, L., Martinet, L. Caractérisation de Flux et Qualité de Service Pour Systèmes de Combat Futurs. Ann. Télécommun. 60, 970–988 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03219956

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03219956

Mots clés

Key words

Search

Navigation