Skip to main content
Log in

Praxiserfahrungen bei der Einführung dezentraler Wissensmanagement-Lösungen

Implementing peer-to-peer technologies — Common problems and prejudices

  • WI—Schwerpunktaufsatz
  • Published:
Wirtschaftsinformatik

Abstract

Efficient management of knowledge is a major success factor for corporations and organizations. Many corporations have started Knowledge Management initiatives with the goal to actively manage knowledge creation and flow. Apart from the necessary organizational changes they have tried to support the quest for knowledge with Knowledge-Management systems. Peer-to-peer systems offer a cost-efficient, user-friendly alternative to server-based knowledge management solutions. However, due to various reasons they have not gained significant market share. During our sales activities for Dinow, our distributed knowledge management system, we have encountered various reasons for the slow adoption of this promising technology. In addition to technological concerns, e.g. regarding security, we have found that psychological factors are very significant: the possibility of “free” information flow contradicts the rigid frameworks, policies, and procedures in most organizations. It is a common misconception that currently used technology, i.e. e-mail, protects against such unwanted information flow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. Blum, Christoph: Knowledge-Management bei der DETECON Consulting GmbH, MKWI 2002: Management der Mitarbeiter-Expertise in IT-Beratungsbetrieben: Grundlagen, Methoden und Werkzeuge, Nü rnberg 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Deutsche Bank, Fraunhofer IAO: Wettbewerbsfaktor Wissen — Leitfaden zum Wissensmanagement, Deutsche Bank AG, Frankfurt/Main 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Delio, Michelle: What They Knowf Could Hurt You, Wired News, 3. Januar 2002, http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,49430,00.html

  4. ekkono GmbH; Dinow. http://www.ekkono.com, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Führer, Kai; Müller, Wolfgang; Schmücker, Jörg: Alle Gleich — P2P in kommerziellen Anwendungen. iX 4/2002. S. 106-109.

  6. Kwak, Chris; Fagin, Robert: Internet Infrastructure & Services, Bear Stearns Equity Research Technology, Mai 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schmücker, Jörg; Müller, Wolfgang: Peer-to-Peer-Systeme für Berater: Groupware und Expertisen-Management gehen Hand in Hand, MKWI 2002: Management der Mitarbeiter-Expertise in IT-Beratungsbetrieben: Grundlagen, Methoden und Werkzeuge, Nürnberg 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wegner, Harald: Vorteile des Einsatzes von agentenbasierten P2P-Technologien im Wissensmanagement, KnowTech 2002, München, http://www.knowtech2002.de/wegner_ekkono_darmstadt.pdf, Oktober 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmücker, J., Müller, W. Praxiserfahrungen bei der Einführung dezentraler Wissensmanagement-Lösungen. Wirtschaftsinf 45, 307–311 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03254948

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03254948

Keywords

Navigation